Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
TLR 22 2.0 Race Kit: 1/10 2WD Buggy thread >

TLR 22 2.0 Race Kit: 1/10 2WD Buggy thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree1Likes

TLR 22 2.0 Race Kit: 1/10 2WD Buggy thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-28-2014, 06:41 AM
  #6076  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (3)
 
JP.R's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 263
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Baskinsj
Frank / JP,

I've set my buggy up to mid motor using the setup Frank recently posted. It feels great. Good rear traction and quick steering. I'm very happy with it except when braking hard it wants to throw the rear end and spin out. After doing some research it looks like I need to reduce the droop in the rear so that less weight is transferred to the front while braking (its currently unscrewed two eyelets). Do you agree? Any other ideas? Thanks
I would guess you have too much brake, are you slamming on them at a pretty high speed part on the track? Wherever it is braking loose, turn down your EPA on your radio till it doesn't loop out.

Hope that helps.
JP
JP.R is offline  
Old 01-28-2014, 08:58 AM
  #6077  
TLRacing
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 101
Default

Originally Posted by J@UNE
Looks like Phend use no extra weight and the esc on saddle with the waterfall...

The only weight I use is 7 grams on the tranny case.
Dakotah Phend is offline  
Old 01-28-2014, 09:21 AM
  #6078  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Carranza76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Eastvale, Ca.
Posts: 2,079
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Dakotah Phend
The only weight I use is 7 grams on the tranny case.
Doesn't look like you are running any aftermarket parts either.
Carranza76 is offline  
Old 01-28-2014, 09:30 AM
  #6079  
TLRacing
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
Frank Root's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Corona, CA, USA
Posts: 5,812
Trader Rating: 25 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Fred Perkins
I am really getting used to the way the 22 drives now and know I am on the right track with my setup. The one thing it is missing is drive off the corner. My car wants to over steer coming out. I don't think its in the rear because it doesn't feel like the rear brakes loose, it feels like the front grabs and pulls the rear around. Here is my current setup:

Front setup is the Ryan/Frank setup with a bell crank steering

Rear setup is the Ryan/Frank setup with 3.5 deg LRC block, 1 deg anti-squat, hubs forward, .75 hex width, 22.5 wt oil, shocks are 1-middle -4 turns, and 1-C link 3mm on the hub side.

Diff is on the tight side

I am also running the Rocket RC rear V2 bulkhead, shorty pack with waterfall brace and 21 grams of side pod weight each side in the rear

Any help would be appreciated!
Try a stiffer front spring, thinner front oil, or 2-A front camber link.

Originally Posted by ronP617
Can you run the pucks drive system in mod??

What's better the MIP cvds or the new tlr drive shafts, or what's the difference?

Thanks
I wouldn't recommend an Alum drive train in Mod, our stuff or MIP's.

The MIP CVDs have a different off-set compared to the TLR CVA's. We have tested both and prefer the TLR 2.0 CVA's with the revised off-set (no spacer).

Originally Posted by TLRbigdog
What is the correct part number for the aluminum M3 nuts? And do they make black ones?

DYN8542 for M3 Locknuts
DYN8552 for M3 Flanged Locknuts

Originally Posted by Baskinsj
Frank / JP,

I've set my buggy up to mid motor using the setup Frank recently posted. It feels great. Good rear traction and quick steering. I'm very happy with it except when braking hard it wants to throw the rear end and spin out. After doing some research it looks like I need to reduce the droop in the rear so that less weight is transferred to the front while braking (its currently unscrewed two eyelets). Do you agree? Any other ideas? Thanks
Like JP said, sounds like too much brake EPA. In MM, you just won't have as much brake force as RM, less weight on the rear tires. Also, with clay tires, once they get more worn in to a 45 deg angle, there is far less surface of tire for biting the track in the reverse location.
Frank Root is offline  
Old 01-28-2014, 11:23 AM
  #6080  
Tech Elite
 
vito's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: roseburg or
Posts: 3,936
Default

I have a viper 17.5 set ant 45 timeing is that a lot? new to this
vito is offline  
Old 01-28-2014, 11:48 AM
  #6081  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: New Jersey
Posts: 8,616
Trader Rating: 22 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by vito
I have a viper 17.5 set ant 45 timeing is that a lot? new to this
Vito,

I ran my motor at 45 deg of timing geared 35/70 but every 17.5 is different. Even 2 of the same brand.

My suggestion is since you are new, set the timing to 30, gear 33/75, and focus on keeping the car on all 4 wheels for the entire race. Don't try to be fast. Try to go around with out every touching the pipe or getting marshalled. Once you can do this every time, then you will start to worry about going fast.

At this point, extra speed is going to do nothing but make you wreck faster and break more.
Bob Barry is offline  
Old 01-28-2014, 01:12 PM
  #6082  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
jbrooks39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 446
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by JP.R
I would guess you have too much brake, are you slamming on them at a pretty high speed part on the track? Wherever it is braking loose, turn down your EPA on your radio till it doesn't loop out.

Hope that helps.
JP
JP

Were most of the guys running shorty packs in their 2WD this past weekend, or were they running saddle packs?

Congrats on the great weekend results!

Joe
jbrooks39 is offline  
Old 01-28-2014, 01:28 PM
  #6083  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (12)
 
jbrooks39's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 446
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default Root MM Front End Question

Frank

You've discussed switching from 25/5 to 25/0 on your front end.

Would a change of 20/5 have the same overall effect as 25/0?

Thanks,
Joe
jbrooks39 is offline  
Old 01-28-2014, 01:34 PM
  #6084  
TLRacing
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
Frank Root's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Corona, CA, USA
Posts: 5,812
Trader Rating: 25 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by jbrooks39
Frank

You've discussed switching from 25/5 to 25/0 on your front end.

Would a change of 20/5 have the same overall effect as 25/0?

Thanks,
Joe
I have actually wanted to try 30 deg kick, but can't since we don't make -5* caster blocks. I think for MM, 20 deg kick would be way to aggressive with that much weight already over the front.
Frank Root is offline  
Old 01-28-2014, 03:09 PM
  #6085  
Administrator
iTrader: (26)
 
Matt M.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2001
Posts: 8,648
Trader Rating: 26 (100%+)
Default

joe, shorty packs..

one of the changes i wanted to make was to go to 25 kick 0 caster
didnt get around to it
Matt M. is offline  
Old 01-28-2014, 03:12 PM
  #6086  
Tech Regular
 
Rybeau40's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Detroit, Michigan
Posts: 289
Default

So is the consensus that MM is the winning way to go on indoor tracks of all types now? Only 1 rear motor in 2wd buggy at Reedy seems to point to yes?
Rybeau40 is offline  
Old 01-28-2014, 03:34 PM
  #6087  
TLRacing
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
Frank Root's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Corona, CA, USA
Posts: 5,812
Trader Rating: 25 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Rybeau40
So is the consensus that MM is the winning way to go on indoor tracks of all types now? Only 1 rear motor in 2wd buggy at Reedy seems to point to yes?
Yup, going that way...
Frank Root is offline  
Old 01-28-2014, 03:43 PM
  #6088  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
AndrewTom's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Thousand Oaks, CA
Posts: 1,429
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Frank,
do you think that this shift to MidMotor will make its way to Stadium Truck and 2wd SCT?
AndrewTom is offline  
Old 01-28-2014, 04:11 PM
  #6089  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (13)
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Norcal
Posts: 789
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by AndrewTom
Frank,
do you think that this shift to MidMotor will make its way to Stadium Truck and 2wd SCT?
not sure about ST, I thought SCT class has already move on to mid motor.
for those big heavy trucks, changing to mid motor won't shift the weight by that much, but will make the car more agile (concentrated weight), yet still easier to handle than light weight 2wd buggies. Even with less traction, mid motor is still a more feasible idea than mid motor in buggy.
for our local track, hard packed clay surface, medium low traction technical track, mid motor feels to be a direct improvement over rear motor. only kyosho and AE guys are using rear motor because they have to, and some of them are struggling with setups.
nicholasxuu is offline  
Old 01-28-2014, 05:23 PM
  #6090  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 116
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Root
Yup, going that way...
Frank,

First, many thanks to you and the many TLR contributors that have made my transition from a B4 to the 22 2.0 a great experience.

I currently run in RM, as that is what I "grew up" with. I want to try MM, but I'm not sure what a good starting point would be for my local track, SDRC in San Diego. Others who are more talented than me would probably characterize the traction to be med/med high traction. I think it to be simply medium. I think OCRC is higher bite for sure. Depend on how much water has been applied

Can you, or someone else much better at setup than I suggest a good starting MM point for this type of track?

Thanks again for all your input on this forum.

Mark
mlinder is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.