Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Tekno SCT410 Thread >

Tekno SCT410 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree17Likes

Tekno SCT410 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-04-2014, 10:12 AM
  #21046  
Tech Addict
 
ChuckTee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 741
Default

Originally Posted by Resqnu
Thanks guys for the quick info. I suppose either would work for me and my tracks. Has either seemed to be more durable? If you had to pick one, which would you pick.
To each their own, its like set ups what is dialed for one is all messy for the next. I have ran both and I have a big "mountain" crossover jump with a big fall to the straight and I would get too much float with the Titan and would spend time correcting before i could take off down the straight. Other than that I like the body. Thats my reason for going to the FTW and I didnt have an issue with the straights feeling loose, but hey thats why I like it...works for me. They are both good bodies its all personal preference and feel.
ChuckTee is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 10:13 AM
  #21047  
Tech Master
iTrader: (11)
 
Jtipsy's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: St. Peters, MO
Posts: 1,358
Trader Rating: 11 (100%+)
Default

On the Nissan body i am on my second one and had the first one cut like rv second one i cut the whole lower rear ones and cut the tops 3mm from the cut line to keep some extra material around the center beam section.
Jtipsy is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 11:29 AM
  #21048  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Hoese37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hutchinson, MN
Posts: 3,819
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Ok I just heard back from Bruce @Xtreme. The 5MM CF rear tower for the SCT/EB/NB would be right around $30. Let me now if you want one, and I can setup to buy a run of these.
Hoese37 is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 12:27 PM
  #21049  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (37)
 
Resqnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 968
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ChuckTee
To each their own, its like set ups what is dialed for one is all messy for the next. I have ran both and I have a big "mountain" crossover jump with a big fall to the straight and I would get too much float with the Titan and would spend time correcting before i could take off down the straight. Other than that I like the body. Thats my reason for going to the FTW and I didnt have an issue with the straights feeling loose, but hey thats why I like it...works for me. They are both good bodies its all personal preference and feel.
Originally Posted by Jtipsy
On the Nissan body i am on my second one and had the first one cut like rv second one i cut the whole lower rear ones and cut the tops 3mm from the cut line to keep some extra material around the center beam section.
Thanks for the info.
Resqnu is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 03:29 PM
  #21050  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
rvinvents's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: so cal
Posts: 419
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by fq06
I'm on my second Titan body and only cut out the spoiler part. I left the top of the bed uncut. Front was not cut on both.
Mine cracked in the center spine piece on the first body that I cut the upper holes out too.
It handles just as well so I'm leaving that part as is and just running the down force cutouts.
thanks that's good to know, I was worried that not cutting out the upper part would affect handling. I am sticking with the titan.
rvinvents is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 03:36 PM
  #21051  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
rvinvents's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: so cal
Posts: 419
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ChuckTee
To each their own, its like set ups what is dialed for one is all messy for the next. I have ran both and I have a big "mountain" crossover jump with a big fall to the straight and I would get too much float with the Titan and would spend time correcting before i could take off down the straight. Other than that I like the body. Thats my reason for going to the FTW and I didnt have an issue with the straights feeling loose, but hey thats why I like it...works for me. They are both good bodies its all personal preference and feel.
I meant no offense chucktee, I am sure I will get it dialed in on the traction, I was only stating what I observed without making any set up changes I do really like the other areas of the handling. Question are you running the side air guards? I did put those on for the first time same night both bodies.
rvinvents is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 03:39 PM
  #21052  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
rvinvents's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: so cal
Posts: 419
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Resqnu
Thanks guys for the quick info. I suppose either would work for me and my tracks. Has either seemed to be more durable? If you had to pick one, which would you pick.
chucktee could answer that better than I. I have only had my FTW on the track for one night, the titan I am going on around two months I think, it is a little brittle in spots DONT CUT OUT THE FULL UPPER CUTOUTS it makes it too weak. IMO
rvinvents is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 05:10 PM
  #21053  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (12)
 
fq06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,646
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Resqnu
Thanks guys for the quick info. I suppose either would work for me and my tracks. Has either seemed to be more durable? If you had to pick one, which would you pick.
I ran the FTW on my Mugen last year and its a nice body. The rear posts ripped through the bed very quickly though. IMO because the molded in roll bar is too close to the post holes.
It could have been a fluke couple of wrecks that took out the rear post area, who knows. Maybe the proline post screws will help with that.

I CA'd plastic washers in to make it live a little longer and the rest of the shell held up very well. No cracks & tears in the usual places up by the front fender & cab, very durable I must say.

That body is actually very old and the fenders don't extend out as far as the newer bodies do to cater to the trucks that get out to the 297mm width limit. I had to cut far up the fender to give the rear tires room and even then there was a lot of contact and rubbing in the rear.

I would love to see Avid do a V2 of that body and give the bed a flat deck for the posts and pull the fenders out a bit while keeping its narrow middle section. I think it would be the top body by far if they tweaked it a little and I would get in line to buy one from the first batch.

The Nissan isn't perfect either, the sharp edges of the headlights are the first to go. Shoegoo the hell out of that area. And where the fenders meet up to the windshield, that area is not as smooth of a transition and an area to invest a liitle goo in also.



Originally Posted by rvinvents
thanks that's good to know, I was worried that not cutting out the upper part would affect handling. I am sticking with the titan.
I should add that I'm running at indoor tracks. Outdoor with wind you might want to open the top vents up a little... maybe not. Try it with just the lowers opened up first.

Last edited by fq06; 04-04-2014 at 05:26 PM.
fq06 is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 06:12 PM
  #21054  
Tech Addict
 
ChuckTee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 741
Default

Originally Posted by rvinvents
I meant no offense chucktee, I am sure I will get it dialed in on the traction, I was only stating what I observed without making any set up changes I do really like the other areas of the handling. Question are you running the side air guards? I did put those on for the first time same night both bodies.
None taken my friend. To each their own, good luck out there. Also no I dont run the side air guards
ChuckTee is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 06:24 PM
  #21055  
Tech Addict
 
ChuckTee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 741
Default

Originally Posted by rvinvents
chucktee could answer that better than I. I have only had my FTW on the track for one night, the titan I am going on around two months I think, it is a little brittle in spots DONT CUT OUT THE FULL UPPER CUTOUTS it makes it too weak. IMO
I thought that the Titan body held up well but like rvin said about the cut outs I would have to second that one I busted the back of mine the second time out with it. Also I noticed that the front area by the lights started to tear. I only ran it for about 2 weeks because I coudnt get it to work for me. I have been running the FTW body for month's now so I dont think I could really give a true reading on the Titan. Like I said before they are both good bodies and bodies are one of those things that do go some what quickly due to the class we are running. So I dont expect way too much outta bodies when it comes to durability, I am more after the performance and am willing to buy a new one every other month or so. I get bored anyways so I get a new one to paint to keep me busy.
ChuckTee is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 08:20 PM
  #21056  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (37)
 
Resqnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 968
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

^^^^^ Great info guys.. thanks
Resqnu is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 09:00 PM
  #21057  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 38
Default

Fioroni pistons what oil and springs are you guys running.
Madjake is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 09:36 PM
  #21058  
Tech Addict
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Shamong, N.J.
Posts: 529
Default

Originally Posted by Madjake
Fioroni pistons what oil and springs are you guys running.
I'm running 30f/25r and green front/ yellow rear springs
purple rides is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 10:30 PM
  #21059  
Tech Prophet
 
tc5 man's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: levittown pa
Posts: 16,997
Default

Guys with the stock chassis do you add lead weight on the Rear end if you remove the center and Rear chassis brace ? I can defietly tell the Rear is lighter than the Front now.
tc5 man is offline  
Old 04-05-2014, 08:07 AM
  #21060  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
rvinvents's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: so cal
Posts: 419
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by tc5 man
Guys with the stock chassis do you add lead weight on the Rear end if you remove the center and Rear chassis brace ? I can defietly tell the Rear is lighter than the Front now.
I added 30 grams of weight in the left rear of chassis and it helped and it could still take even more, but i noticed a bigger traction gain from switching bodies the two i found that had great rear traction was the nissan titan and the f250 super duty, they both have the built in wing which gives gobs of down force in the rear, but the f250 is very long and is slower to rotate in corners.
rvinvents is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.