Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Tekno SCT410 Thread >

Tekno SCT410 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree17Likes

Tekno SCT410 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-03-2014, 08:21 PM
  #21031  
Tech Addict
 
ChuckTee's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: San Jose, California
Posts: 741
Default

Originally Posted by Randidly
No I just drilled out the post and used the Pro-Line Extended Body Mount Thumbwasher Kit
Cool man, thanks for the info.
ChuckTee is offline  
Old 04-03-2014, 10:17 PM
  #21032  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 17
Default Shock rebound

So tonight i took the springs off in order to take the orings off of the shocks ( read that these were mainly for high bite conditions and most of the tracks around here are either hard packed with a layer of dust or loose dirt). When i removed the spring on the left rear shock the shock was still rebounding out all the way to full extension. I know this isnt correct and rebuilt it to match the right rear, but still wasnt able to get 0% rebound. Without the spring it still pushes back out between a quarter and a half an inch. My question is is this ok? And what ill handling effects would be caused by the rebound being as far off as it was? I actually won a race setup this way last weekend lol. Sorry for the long post and all the newb problems.
Jdadkins91 is offline  
Old 04-03-2014, 11:40 PM
  #21033  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
rvinvents's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: so cal
Posts: 419
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by tc5 man
I have a question on the droop . I noticed that even with the droop screws screwed in all the way into the arms you dont get full droop . Just where there touching the chassis which is fine . I have the screws where the button head is hitting the chassis of course.

So i just have them with the screws touching the chassis . But if you flip them around without the button head touching the chassis it digs into the chassis to much which is bad but you can get full droop.

I tried the Mugen droop screws they do work but there shorter than the Tekno ones. I just like them because you can screw them on the top.



I rather have the droop screws where there just touching the chassis anyways . Dont want the shock shaft to pull out.
if your using the mugen droop screws I found it helpful to slightly file the chassis at a slight angle where the the button head part of the screw makes contact then you can get more droop.
rvinvents is offline  
Old 04-03-2014, 11:56 PM
  #21034  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
rvinvents's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: so cal
Posts: 419
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

I ran the FTW body and the nissan titan body back to back tonight, several packs with both and what I found is you were right CHUCKTEE the FTW does glide around the track nicely very nimble feeling and better steering too. but the nissan titan body is MUCH more planted feeling especially in the high speed straight away the FTW seemed very light and squirly while the down force of the titan kept ti very stable and predictable, also the rear traction is hands down far better with the titan that little built in wing really does its job, in my opinion the slight steering gain is not worth the loss of traction, I was much faster with the titan and able to be much more aggressive with the throttle = more fun. *all settings were the same for both bodies, only the ride height was adjusted.
rvinvents is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 12:35 AM
  #21035  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (5)
 
Squirrely's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Paso Robles, CA
Posts: 108
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by tc5 man
I have a question on the droop . I noticed that even with the droop screws screwed in all the way into the arms you dont get full droop . Just where there touching the chassis which is fine . I have the screws where the button head is hitting the chassis of course.

So i just have them with the screws touching the chassis . But if you flip them around without the button head touching the chassis it digs into the chassis to much which is bad but you can get full droop.

I tried the Mugen droop screws they do work but there shorter than the Tekno ones. I just like them because you can screw them on the top.



I rather have the droop screws where there just touching the chassis anyways . Dont want the shock shaft to pull out.
As mentioned earlier you need to file down the tabs on the chassis. The droop screws flipped can only be done on the eb48 and BCE chassis because the chassis tabs are tapered. You can grind or file down the tabs on the stock chassis though. I did it and love the ability to run the screws flipped. I think I tapered them down to an 1/8th inch

I can't upload pictures from my phone but if you go to this link it links to my thread on RCshortcourse and has some information on the tabs on pages 2 & 3

There are some pictures on there where you can see the difference in the BCE tabs compared to the stock chassis tabs

http://www.rcshortcourse.com/forum/t...no-sct410.html
Squirrely is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 06:48 AM
  #21036  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (37)
 
Resqnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 968
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by rvinvents
I ran the FTW body and the nissan titan body back to back tonight, several packs with both and what I found is you were right CHUCKTEE the FTW does glide around the track nicely very nimble feeling and better steering too. but the nissan titan body is MUCH more planted feeling especially in the high speed straight away the FTW seemed very light and squirly while the down force of the titan kept ti very stable and predictable, also the rear traction is hands down far better with the titan that little built in wing really does its job, in my opinion the slight steering gain is not worth the loss of traction, I was much faster with the titan and able to be much more aggressive with the throttle = more fun. *all settings were the same for both bodies, only the ride height was adjusted.
Were you using any cutouts on the bodies? I'm fixing to buy on of these 2 bodies?
Resqnu is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 06:56 AM
  #21037  
Tech Master
iTrader: (18)
 
boudin4evr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,943
Trader Rating: 18 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ChuckTee
Man I am going through my truck before tomorrow's race night and I notice that something dont look right. Turns out I am missing a rear hinge pin holder so my rear arm has been flopping around for God knows how long....great. Good thing about it is I have a 2nd and a 3rd place finish under my belt, I thought that something felt and looked squirrley, I have to start paying better attention. The details my friends......the details. Either way I fixed it and hope it feels better tomorrow.
wow! taking names without a hinge pin holder! awesome!
boudin4evr is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 06:57 AM
  #21038  
Tech Master
iTrader: (18)
 
boudin4evr's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Location: Colorado Springs, CO
Posts: 1,943
Trader Rating: 18 (100%+)
Default

the AVID pins make it really easy to measure droop!
boudin4evr is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 08:36 AM
  #21039  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
rvinvents's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: so cal
Posts: 419
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Resqnu
Were you using any cutouts on the bodies? I'm fixing to buy on of these 2 bodies?

just the one on the FTW

hard to see the body is getting worn but the nissan has the lower cutouts which are essential for the down force, the upper cutouts by the cab i might try without next time or make them smaller as it weakened the body.
I would say if you have plenty of traction go with the FTW but if you want more rear traction and stability then go nissan
rvinvents is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 08:59 AM
  #21040  
Tech Elite
 
Mizchief's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Posts: 2,069
Default

Originally Posted by Resqnu
Thanks, did you have any issues with the 6500?
I accidentally ran the 6500 smc instead of my 7200 in a PNB 10 min qualifier with one warm up lap. It did start to fall off around the last couple of laps, but was able to finish without noticing too much difference.

Current limit was around 60% and the track was pretty hazardous so I was running slow and steady.
Mizchief is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 09:04 AM
  #21041  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (12)
 
fq06's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 5,646
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by rvinvents

just the one on the FTW

hard to see the body is getting worn but the nissan has the lower cutouts which are essential for the down force, the upper cutouts by the cab i might try without next time or make them smaller as it weakened the body.
I would say if you have plenty of traction go with the FTW but if you want more rear traction and stability then go nissan
I'm on my second Titan body and only cut out the spoiler part. I left the top of the bed uncut. Front was not cut on both.
Mine cracked in the center spine piece on the first body that I cut the upper holes out too.
It handles just as well so I'm leaving that part as is and just running the down force cutouts.
fq06 is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 09:23 AM
  #21042  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (226)
 
skengines's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: SoCal
Posts: 5,297
Trader Rating: 226 (100%+)
Default

Anyone have a good setup for an rutted outdoor track?
skengines is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 09:34 AM
  #21043  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (37)
 
Resqnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 968
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Mizchief
I accidentally ran the 6500 smc instead of my 7200 in a PNB 10 min qualifier with one warm up lap. It did start to fall off around the last couple of laps, but was able to finish without noticing too much difference.

Current limit was around 60% and the track was pretty hazardous so I was running slow and steady.
Thanks
Resqnu is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 09:37 AM
  #21044  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (37)
 
Resqnu's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: NC
Posts: 968
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by rvinvents

just the one on the FTW

hard to see the body is getting worn but the nissan has the lower cutouts which are essential for the down force, the upper cutouts by the cab i might try without next time or make them smaller as it weakened the body.
I would say if you have plenty of traction go with the FTW but if you want more rear traction and stability then go nissan
Originally Posted by fq06
I'm on my second Titan body and only cut out the spoiler part. I left the top of the bed uncut. Front was not cut on both.
Mine cracked in the center spine piece on the first body that I cut the upper holes out too.
It handles just as well so I'm leaving that part as is and just running the down force cutouts.
Thanks guys for the quick info. I suppose either would work for me and my tracks. Has either seemed to be more durable? If you had to pick one, which would you pick.
Resqnu is offline  
Old 04-04-2014, 09:59 AM
  #21045  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Hoese37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hutchinson, MN
Posts: 3,819
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by skengines
Anyone have a good setup for an rutted outdoor track?
Box setup is very good.
Hoese37 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.