Tekno RC EB48 Thread
#9648
Not sure why people are wanting to move the battery back in this buggy ? F/R balance is pretty spot on IMO , moving the battery back would just mess with the chassis handling .
On the SCT410 I could see moving the battery back as a lot of people complain about it being nose heavy . But the buggy has always flew great IMO , even with the softish stock setup the original had ......
On the SCT410 I could see moving the battery back as a lot of people complain about it being nose heavy . But the buggy has always flew great IMO , even with the softish stock setup the original had ......
#9649
Tech Master
iTrader: (33)
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 1,486
From: Greenville, SC
Not sure why people are wanting to move the battery back in this buggy ? F/R balance is pretty spot on IMO , moving the battery back would just mess with the chassis handling .
On the SCT410 I could see moving the battery back as a lot of people complain about it being nose heavy . But the buggy has always flew great IMO , even with the softish stock setup the original had ......
On the SCT410 I could see moving the battery back as a lot of people complain about it being nose heavy . But the buggy has always flew great IMO , even with the softish stock setup the original had ......
#9650
could be some are having issues getting it to hook up on the rear. I am assuming that is part of why the rear toe in block with the more toe options works well.
Me, I went with 2K rear diff fluid and its worked really well.
Me, I went with 2K rear diff fluid and its worked really well.
#9651
I had both the Eb48 and Eb48.2. If the Bce chassis cures/helps with the corner exit grip I will get another one. I did like the car, but the corner exit was a problem when compared to my Mugen..(same day,same track,same tires,same motor,geared properly.)
#9652
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,595
From: Covington, La.
I was able to race mine again last night on a loose somewhat blown out track. I had plenty of rear traction with the kit chassis and a few minor setup changes over the kit setup. I raised the rear inner camber link to the upper hole and went to the longest wheelbase that i could. Car was hooked. However, I was on the pipe like a crack head on payday in a chicane section that was giving me fits all day.
i did also try the kyosho light blue spring up front and the orange in the rear. I felt the car was way too lazy with on entry and unpredictable on exit. However, I still have yet to try the 1.3 8 hole pistons yet.
i did also try the kyosho light blue spring up front and the orange in the rear. I felt the car was way too lazy with on entry and unpredictable on exit. However, I still have yet to try the 1.3 8 hole pistons yet.
#9656
#9657
or the TKR6035 Pink front are to hard?
and the kyosho Lt Blue are way to soft.
green are in the middle of the front springs chart?
#9658
How do you come to the conclusion that the Tekno Pinks are too hard? They are only rated at 3.83lbs/in. I think you have it backwards.
Tekno Green are rated at 4.15lbs/in.
Kyosho Lt Blue are like 4.45lbs/in. They are more progressive than the similarly rated Tekno yellows too.
Tekno Green are rated at 4.15lbs/in.
Kyosho Lt Blue are like 4.45lbs/in. They are more progressive than the similarly rated Tekno yellows too.
#9659
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,595
From: Covington, La.
All of my other parts will be here shortly and that's when the real fun will begin.



2Likes
