Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
TLR 22 Racing Buggy Thread >

TLR 22 Racing Buggy Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree1Likes

TLR 22 Racing Buggy Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 02-19-2013, 08:14 AM
  #19081  
TLRacing
iTrader: (25)
 
Frank Root's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Corona, CA, USA
Posts: 5,812
Trader Rating: 25 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by rc10t4orange
Frank I heard you are running a S6070 servo. I just put one in my buggy and I would like to know if you would point me in the right direction as to how to get everything to clear? Thanks
I haven't run one in almost 2 years. I really ran those when I was running mid motor. You will need to use a Dremel and clearance the front of the servo case for the steering link some, and the rest should work fine. I am not sure about how many servo shims are needed.
Frank Root is offline  
Old 02-19-2013, 08:21 AM
  #19082  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (14)
 
gticlay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,105
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Root
I haven't run one in almost 2 years. I really ran those when I was running mid motor. You will need to use a Dremel and clearance the front of the servo case for the steering link some, and the rest should work fine. I am not sure about how many servo shims are needed.
I have a 6040 and my Futaba receiver won't really fit between the servo and battery. Is there a similarly spec'd one that is not so deep?
gticlay is offline  
Old 02-19-2013, 09:10 AM
  #19083  
Tech Master
iTrader: (56)
 
DanielC.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: FL
Posts: 1,656
Trader Rating: 56 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
The really interesting point is what it would do to handling.
With that bell crank setup as opposed to the straight rack setup you're going to get a progressive Ackerman change through the steering throw. As the bell cranks approach each extremity it will move the draglink/steering brace forward, increasing Ackerman which should smooth out the steering depending on how the steering links line up on the draglink? One of the benefits I see (other than the reduction in slop) is that you should be able to get full travel with less servo movement.

EDIT: I'm fairly certain that the mystery company is Akula. Take a look at their show car and compare:
http://www.akularacing.co.uk/portfolio/speartooth-22/
DanielC. is offline  
Old 02-19-2013, 09:43 AM
  #19084  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Wildcat1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 17,388
Trader Rating: 84 (100%+)
Default

Interesting conversion
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 02-19-2013, 09:52 AM
  #19085  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Carranza76's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Eastvale, Ca.
Posts: 2,079
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by DanielC.
With that bell crank setup as opposed to the straight rack setup you're going to get a progressive Ackerman change through the steering throw. As the bell cranks approach each extremity it will move the draglink/steering brace forward, increasing Ackerman which should smooth out the steering depending on how the steering links line up on the draglink? One of the benefits I see (other than the reduction in slop) is that you should be able to get full travel with less servo movement.

EDIT: I'm fairly certain that the mystery company is Akula. Take a look at their show car and compare:
http://www.akularacing.co.uk/portfolio/speartooth-22/
It looks like the same car as the blue washers are a dead give away.
Carranza76 is offline  
Old 02-19-2013, 12:43 PM
  #19086  
TLRacing
iTrader: (25)
 
Frank Root's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Corona, CA, USA
Posts: 5,812
Trader Rating: 25 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by gticlay
I have a 6040 and my Futaba receiver won't really fit between the servo and battery. Is there a similarly spec'd one that is not so deep?
A current Futaba receiver should fit... is yours an older one? Do you have the aluminum battery brace mounted forward?
Frank Root is offline  
Old 02-19-2013, 12:47 PM
  #19087  
CGR
Tech Regular
 
CGR's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 384
Default

Confirmed, its Akula.

https://www.facebook.com/media/set/?...4230037&type=3
CGR is offline  
Old 02-19-2013, 01:38 PM
  #19088  
Tech Adept
 
university_dave's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Milton Keynes, England
Posts: 187
Default

Yes, it is indeed something we are working on. Initial testing is promising, the steering feels a lot more precise and the car is easier to drive consistently. However, at the moment we are only testing on UK tracks - so indoors on carpet or outdoors on astroturf.

We are planning on doing some more detailed testing this weekend, so keep an eye on our Facebook page and we'll try and post some details of how things are going up there.
university_dave is offline  
Old 02-19-2013, 02:28 PM
  #19089  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (17)
 
rc10t4orange's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 430
Trader Rating: 17 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by gticlay
I have a 6040 and my Futaba receiver won't really fit between the servo and battery. Is there a similarly spec'd one that is not so deep?
I have a 6040 in my 22t and the 6070 in my 22. The 6070 is not quite the specs of the 6040 but low profile. You have to mount your receiver on the side.
rc10t4orange is offline  
Old 02-19-2013, 04:46 PM
  #19090  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (14)
 
gticlay's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 2,105
Trader Rating: 14 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Frank Root
A current Futaba receiver should fit... is yours an older one? Do you have the aluminum battery brace mounted forward?
I have the OEM plastic battery stopper and a new Futaba 4pl receiver. It will not fit. I'll post a picture later.
gticlay is offline  
Old 02-19-2013, 05:13 PM
  #19091  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (8)
 
caguilar4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 138
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

I have been reading the Hudy setup guide, and it highly recommends weight balancing the car (fr-rear, left-right). I just slapped my buggy into two scales and it needs almost 12 oz upfront to balance it.

Does this sound right? Is it too much weight? Has anybody tried this approach?
caguilar4 is offline  
Old 02-19-2013, 05:16 PM
  #19092  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Wildcat1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 17,388
Trader Rating: 84 (100%+)
Default

you do not balance front to rear. you balance left to right. then balance front to trat based on what you need from the car
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 02-19-2013, 05:57 PM
  #19093  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (8)
 
caguilar4's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 138
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
you do not balance front to rear. you balance left to right. then balance front to trat based on what you need from the car
Thanks, would've been odd to have the weight of two iphones upfront!

S when would I need more weight upfront? When I want my car to nose dive entering a turn perhaps?
caguilar4 is offline  
Old 02-19-2013, 06:02 PM
  #19094  
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Wildcat1971's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Arizona
Posts: 17,388
Trader Rating: 84 (100%+)
Default

More weight up front will increase off and on power steering. but weight is not the only way to add steering. Just one way. Its a balancing act
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 02-19-2013, 07:42 PM
  #19095  
Tech Addict
 
chuckinator's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Tucson, Az
Posts: 624
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
More weight up front will increase off and on power steering. but weight is not the only way to add steering. Just one way. Its a balancing act
That's not 100% correct. You can get add weight to the front of your car and it can actually deaden the response of the front. It's something to do especially on high bite surfaces when the front is too grabby.
chuckinator is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.