Community
Wiki Posts
Search

SC10 Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-18-2012 | 05:35 PM
  #11356  
Cloaked's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,202
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by mojoman81
Thank you kuya. Yes carbon is stiffer and lighter but break easier. Btw thanks for the revtech its running great.
Yes and know, depends on the quality of the CF.

Good quality CF will take more abuse then any plastic part, the main advantage of CF is that it will not bend it has only 1 breaking point and that is the actual break point.

So in theory Good Quality CF should remain stiff and straight while other plastic peices bend.

Whether thats a good thing, I dunno it put more stress on other plastic parts.
Cloaked is offline  
Old 04-18-2012 | 05:56 PM
  #11357  
Brushless420's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (176)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 2,007
From: St.Pete, FL
Default

Originally Posted by cody161
If you are that good of a driver then why did you feel the need to put carbon fiber arms on it?
Sorry didnt realize your from Kentucky. Forget what I said as I just wasted my breath.

Carbon arms are stock on the Factory Team kit FYI. The carbon arms are more precise and dont flex unlike the RPM arms. The RPM stuff is designed for the basher and flex quite a bit and do not hold a setup well. Also the RPM arms do not allow for the intallation of a sway bar unless you drill your own holes.
Brushless420 is offline  
Old 04-18-2012 | 06:06 PM
  #11358  
ShortCourseOnly's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 1,192
From: São Paulo, Brazil
Default

I only use the FT Carbon arms. They can break if you drive a little stupid. I prefer the stiff performance of the Carbon arms.
ShortCourseOnly is offline  
Old 04-18-2012 | 06:24 PM
  #11359  
nismomike's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 867
From: Gilbert AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Brushless420
Sorry didnt realize your from Kentucky. Forget what I said as I just wasted my breath.

Carbon arms are stock on the Factory Team kit FYI. The carbon arms are more precise and dont flex unlike the RPM arms. The RPM stuff is designed for the basher and flex quite a bit and do not hold a setup well. Also the RPM arms do not allow for the intallation of a sway bar unless you drill your own holes.
When did you get a SC10 Factory Team kit with carbon arms? I buy a new kit every year or so just before Az State Championships and SRS Cactus Classic. I have never gotten an SC10 Factory Team that came with carbon anything.
Btw, the carbon arms vs stock arms are only a tuning option and not meant to be a durability upgrade and were never meant to be.
nismomike is offline  
Old 04-18-2012 | 08:31 PM
  #11360  
CraigMBA's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Mar 2003
Posts: 2,838
From: Valley of the Dirt, CA
Default

Originally Posted by Brushless420
Sorry didnt realize your from Kentucky. Forget what I said as I just wasted my breath.
I lol'd. That was awesome.

I broke one RF a arm in a year. Somebody decided it would be a good idea to get a broom out and help out the sweeper right before I got there. It wasn't fun, but it was funny.
CraigMBA is offline  
Old 04-18-2012 | 09:27 PM
  #11361  
J_Bone's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,070
From: Mesa, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by Mizchief
I was disappointed in the RPM bumper. It caused me to DNF since it put too much stress on the 4 bottom screws and mine backed out. Mostly my fault because I did the metric conversion and had different threads, but still don't like the design.

I got the T-bone now: http://t-bone-racing.net/Brand-A-M/Associated/SC10-c37/

i haven't raced with it yet but I like how it's smoother and had a brace. I like the rear bumper too since it sticks out past the body so the rear won't get torn up on the outer posts.
I plan on getting rid of my RPM bumper too, but I don't care for the T-Bone one even more. Im going to run stock .
J_Bone is offline  
Old 04-18-2012 | 09:34 PM
  #11362  
Cloaked's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (15)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,202
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

Originally Posted by J_Bone
I plan on getting rid of my RPM bumper too, but I don't care for the T-Bone one even more. Im going to run stock .
Apparently the new SC10's are stronger in this area and the RPM bumper is no longer necessary.



.... So I have heard.
Cloaked is offline  
Old 04-18-2012 | 09:40 PM
  #11363  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 155
From: Franklin, Ky
Default

Originally Posted by Brushless420
Sorry didnt realize your from Kentucky. Forget what I said as I just wasted my breath.

Carbon arms are stock on the Factory Team kit FYI. The carbon arms are more precise and dont flex unlike the RPM arms. The RPM stuff is designed for the basher and flex quite a bit and do not hold a setup well. Also the RPM arms do not allow for the intallation of a sway bar unless you drill your own holes.
I agree the Kentucky joke was a good one.

I am on the same page as nismomike though, when did you get a FT kit with carbon arms? It doesn't list it in the description and in the picture of the front suspension it doesn't look carbon either.

Also the guy said he was wanting more durability, not for his truck to handle better, so I gave him my opinion on what I thought added durability.
cody161 is offline  
Old 04-18-2012 | 09:51 PM
  #11364  
nismomike's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 867
From: Gilbert AZ
Default

When I first started running my SC10, I put RPM arms, bumper/skid, and ball cups on it. Mostly because I sucked at landing the downside. Sucked at landing all together. Heard the rumors about the broken chassis. Saw pictures of them broken. So I just ran RPM. About a year and a half later I decided it was time to run the stock parts. The RPM bumper bottoms out more and I hated the look. Well, since switching back to stock 6 months ago I broke my first arm last night. I believe I stress fractured it at Cactus Classic and I finally finished it off. Anyone who saw the front quad at Cactus knows what I'm talkin about and I'm not suprised. The stock parts are better than fine if you can drive decent. I still use the RPM ball cups and they ARE better than stock. I'm happier with my sc with the stock parts.
nismomike is offline  
Old 04-19-2012 | 07:14 AM
  #11365  
AlanHall's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (43)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 3,011
From: Watson ,Louisiana
Default

Does anyone have the part # for the carbon arms?
AlanHall is offline  
Old 04-19-2012 | 08:01 AM
  #11366  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (9)
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 155
From: Franklin, Ky
Default

Here is the link to the front arms.

http://www.amainhobbies.com/product_...rm-Carbon-T4-2
cody161 is offline  
Old 04-19-2012 | 01:24 PM
  #11367  
Tech Master
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,068
From: Knuckles Deep
Default

Originally Posted by Cloaked
Apparently the new SC10's are stronger in this area and the RPM bumper is no longer necessary.



.... So I have heard.
I think you might be right, bought my SC10 FT about a year ago and never had a problem with the bumper. I bought the RPM as a backup and switced it out anyway, figure it would help keeping the body from flexing and cracking in the front when a wall jumps out in front of me.

Bought the RPM heavy duty cups 3 years ago for my TC5 before I realized they were too thick and binding the steering. Saved them and was finally able to utilize them on another vehicle and they work great.
Layin' Wood is offline  
Old 04-19-2012 | 01:27 PM
  #11368  
mojoman81's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,579
From: Md
Default

Originally Posted by cody161
Here is the link to the front arms.

http://www.amainhobbies.com/product_...rm-Carbon-T4-2
Don't forget the link to the shock towers.
mojoman81 is offline  
Old 04-19-2012 | 01:51 PM
  #11369  
bschelling's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (32)
 
Joined: Dec 2010
Posts: 426
From: Middle TN
Wink Rx cover

Originally Posted by drtdvl4
That box came on my SC10 RS. I wish it wasn't there. Every time I need to unplug the ESC to program it or remove the servo I have to remove the cover. It is also hard to plug in the ESC and servo to the rx due to the cramped space in the box. I would like to eliminate it, but the antenna mounts to the cover. Unless you absolute need the cover, I would pass.
I had some old rc10 stadium trucks and buggies sitting around. so I drilled a hole next to the reciever in my sc10 to accommodate their old antenna mounts and eliminate the bulky box. I would recommend tapering the hole in the bottom so it doesn't catch dirt.

Love my sc10!!
bschelling is offline  
Old 04-19-2012 | 02:18 PM
  #11370  
bergie33's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (49)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 567
From: Central Coast, California
Default

Originally Posted by bschelling
I had some old rc10 stadium trucks and buggies sitting around. so I drilled a hole next to the reciever in my sc10 to accommodate their old antenna mounts and eliminate the bulky box. I would recommend tapering the hole in the bottom so it doesn't catch dirt.

Love my sc10!!
Does the antenna mast really have to be used? I just kind of coil (not tightly) my receiver antenna wire and lay it next to the receiver. I have never had a problem.
bergie33 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.