Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Team Associated B6.1 & B6.1D thread >

Team Associated B6.1 & B6.1D thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree1089Likes

Team Associated B6.1 & B6.1D thread

    Hide Wikipost
Old 03-24-2020, 06:21 PM   -   Wikipost
R/C Tech ForumsThread Wiki: Team Associated B6.1 & B6.1D thread
Please read: This is a community-maintained wiki post containing the most important information from this thread. You may edit the Wiki once you have been a member for 90 days and have made 90 posts.
 
Last edit by: Kraig
Welcome to the B6.1 and B6.1D Wiki page.





Features:

Easy-access gear differential
Differential height adjustment with 0, 1, 2, and 3mm inserts included
New slipper assembly for better weight balance and shock clearance
3-gear Laydown Stealth(r) transmission for lower and forward CG
Heavy-duty V2 routed graphite front shock tower with tower guard
Heavy-duty V2 routed graphite rear tower, standard height
Heavy-duty V2 rear axle with 67mm bones
V2 springs for a more reactive and nimble feel
Innovative rear arm with molded inserts for ultra-fine lower shock mount adjustment
Molded spur gear guard to help protect body from damage
Front and rear anti-roll bars limit chassis roll for increased corner speed
Battery strap allows the use of optional turnbuckle-based braces
Machined pistons included for better fit and smoother operation
Aluminum rear clamping hex and front axle with laser etching
Rear hubs feature large bearings and the easy-insert system to adjust camber link position and rear axle height
One-piece shock bushing to make assembly easier
Aluminum C and D arm mounts included for large range of anti-squat and toe adjustment
Lightweight aluminum top shaft
Factory Team upgraded ball bearing kit included (now oiled instead of greased for less drag)
JConcepts(r) B6 clear body and wing included
Steel chassis weight
Shortened, 7075 aluminum chassis






Features:

Easy-access ball differential
Differential height adjustment with 0, 1, 2, and 3mm inserts included
New slipper assembly for better weight balance and shock clearance
3-gear Lay Back Stealth(r) transmission for lower and rearward CG
Heavy-duty V2 routed graphite front shock tower with tower guard
Heavy-duty V2 routed graphite rear tower, long
Heavy-duty V2 rear axle with 67mm bones
V2 springs for a more reactive and nimble feel
Innovative rear arm with molded inserts for ultra-fine lower shock mount adjustment
Molded spur gear guard to help protect body from damage
+1 steering block arms optimize feel on dirt tracks
Battery strap allows the use of optional turnbuckle-based braces
Machined pistons included for better fit and smoother operation
Aluminum rear clamping hex and front axle with laser etching
Rear hubs feature large bearings and the easy-insert system to adjust camber link position and rear axle height
One-piece shock bushing to make assembly easier
Aluminum C and D arm mounts included for large range of anti-squat and toe adjustment
Lightweight aluminum top shaft
Factory Team upgraded ball bearing kit included (now oiled instead of greased for less drag)
JConcepts(r) B6 clear body and wing included
Shortened, 7075 aluminum chassis


Setup Sheets and other documentation
Setup sheets for both cars:
Piston Drills:
Aftermarket Upgrades:

Parts List:

Reference Guides (courtesy of Ray Munday and Roger M.):

Print Wikipost

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-29-2018, 05:52 AM
  #1036  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (358)
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 8,506
Trader Rating: 358 (100%+)
Default

To use Ae 67 hubs are you guys shaving the hub or the arm?
jmoneym is offline  
Old 04-29-2018, 06:36 AM
  #1037  
Tech Regular
 
Poppin Fresh's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: NY NY
Posts: 342
Default

Originally Posted by imprsme
For the guys that are saying the car is light. Are you building the kit straight from the box or are you building with Ti screws and other weight saving items.

Because I am not finding the car to be light at all.

I weighed chassis to chassis with my b6.

No tires,battery or body.

Same electronics other than the b6 had. Small fan.

The b6.1 was 60 grams heavier.

My b6 ready to hit the track with both weights under the servo and electronics. WITH 70grams under the battery hits the track at 1551 grams.

My b6.1 same weights minus the 70grams under the battery and it was 1620.

I can see where guys may be seeing it as “light” since the new car comes with a light weight body where other kits didn’t.

Thats why I weighed just chassis vs chassis.

Other than that the car is pretty good. Made a few changes to suit me and my track. But was able to TQ and get a win on the first day out.


Also another problem I noticed.

While running JConcepts Pindowns in the rear the tires are hitting the wing causing a lot of inconsistency.
I did cut out some “relief” area in the wing and that helped.

Just wondering if anyone else saw this problem.

It is heavier than the original B6 due to the new transmission case and extra hardware needed, but I feel it is negligible in affecting performance. The B6.1 is a great step forward in regards to handling, tuning, and maintenance.
Poppin Fresh is offline  
Old 04-29-2018, 07:48 AM
  #1038  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (166)
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Vancouver, Washington
Posts: 4,596
Trader Rating: 166 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Brown
The new car is pretty light. The brass weights under the battery are helpful to add weight without making the front end too heavy. There's a lot of debate on heavier vs. lighter cars and which is best. Personally my car, whether running 17.5 or mod, has handled best between 1540-1570 grams.
I agree with a slightly heavier car. My Yokomos like to be light, but only when grip is up (currently between 1510-1525, depending on how many weight plates under the battery). Seems my B6.1D likes to be between 1525-1540 for optimal performance wen the grip is either the same or a little less then optimal. The Layback definitely helps when the grip level decreases.
jpcopeland1 is offline  
Old 04-29-2018, 09:33 AM
  #1039  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: St Louis
Posts: 91
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by jmoneym
To use Ae 67 hubs are you guys shaving the hub or the arm?
Just wanted to add to this.
Are you guys talking about shaving for part number 91760 or 91548? I thought 91760 was a direct fit. Thanks
Vujkovicv is offline  
Old 04-29-2018, 01:04 PM
  #1040  
Tech Master
iTrader: (67)
 
BRSracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Blue Springs MO
Posts: 1,947
Trader Rating: 67 (100%+)
Default

Ran my car for the first time last week. Really like the car, however it was loose for my liking. I added the brass c mount and it was pretty much perfect after that. Running the D version with the layback transmission.
BRSracing is offline  
Old 04-29-2018, 04:25 PM
  #1041  
Tech Master
iTrader: (21)
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: Wisconsin
Posts: 1,250
Trader Rating: 21 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Vujkovicv
Just wanted to add to this.
Are you guys talking about shaving for part number 91760 or 91548? I thought 91760 was a direct fit. Thanks
If you have the old 91760 then you will have to shave them or the arm. They made a running change and the latest ones can be put right on
Brian L is offline  
Old 04-29-2018, 05:20 PM
  #1042  
Suspended
iTrader: (76)
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Location: Nashville, TN
Posts: 2,275
Trader Rating: 76 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by FasterLouder
Looks like a bad imitation of a 22 4.0.
I've built and owned lots of AE cars and have just finished building a 22 4.0.
Blown away.
AE could at least design a car that has some origional thinking and engineering involved, like Schumacher or Hot Bodies, but then, if you're going to copy something, you might as well copy the best.
The quick access to the diff is cool, but open the diff and it looks like something out of a Tamiya Astute.
TLR's planetary gear diff is beyond comparison to the AE part.
The 4.0 ball diff is the best ball diff I've ever built and I've built lots.
Don't waste your money, just go buy a 22 4.0.
I could say dont waste your $$ on any new car. I just ran my V1 TRF201 rear motor pin style wheel car and it does really well.


Dont understand this new wave of lay down mid motor spend all my cash type cars.

This is on CRC black.






Last edited by Metalsoft; 04-29-2018 at 06:00 PM.
Metalsoft is offline  
Old 04-29-2018, 08:16 PM
  #1043  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (90)
 
Johnn27's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: " The World's Most Famous Beach "
Posts: 2,314
Trader Rating: 90 (100%+)
Questions?? Shorter Wheelbase

For those who run on astroturf or high traction carpet how has the short wheelbase changed your setup..... if at all?
Johnn27 is offline  
Old 04-29-2018, 10:02 PM
  #1044  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (20)
 
Swooz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2017
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 116
Trader Rating: 20 (100%+)
Default

Drove the b6.1 for the first time today. I currently drive Xb2 and xb4 in two other classes. Didn’t want to dump all the money into another Xb2 to get it the way I like. I set it up as close I could to my Xb2, using Schelle -2 hubs very similar to the new team kit hubs from X-ray, +1 steering blocks, aluminum steering rack/ bell crank/ horn, all the brass/ steel weights bulk head, some shims, and the only other things I changed from stock was differential to 10k and 450cst front, 400cst rear shocks per my track layout. I was very impressed with how responsive the car was. Corner exits were super impressive. My biggest complaints are the ball cups, especially on the steering links, even with chap stick and dry wax I managed to pop them off the steering links a few times. When assembling the turnbuckles I was worried about it after how easily they snapped into the ball studs. A buddy at the track recommended the b5m cups, so I’ll give those a try. My only other complaints are motor mount fan locations. I tried to mount the fan in the left rear next to the slipper spring “clearing the slipper lock nut by maybe 2.5-3mm” and that only lasted a few runs. I saw a few recommendations in earlier posts, any other options or ideas would be greatly appreciated. Overall I’m very happy with the car, easy to drive with responsive tuning.
Johnn27 likes this.
Swooz is offline  
Old 04-30-2018, 04:21 AM
  #1045  
Tech Master
iTrader: (15)
 
jag5508's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: South Of Heaven
Posts: 1,666
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Johnn27
For those who run on astroturf or high traction carpet how has the short wheelbase changed your setup..... if at all?
Yea it changed we pretty much ran close to the stock setup on the B6. This car the setup is a bit different. Some guys like it. I don't like it at all. I'll try a couple more things then I'll decide what I'll do with it.
jag5508 is offline  
Old 04-30-2018, 06:00 AM
  #1046  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 23
Default

Anyone know if the B6.1 Shock Caps are the same as the B6? I would think so, but just wanted to be sure. I can't find the B6 caps in stock anywhere, but the 6.1 seem available.

Thanks
McKrakken is offline  
Old 04-30-2018, 07:29 AM
  #1047  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (21)
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Texas
Posts: 3,782
Trader Rating: 21 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by McKrakken
Anyone know if the B6.1 Shock Caps are the same as the B6? I would think so, but just wanted to be sure. I can't find the B6 caps in stock anywhere, but the 6.1 seem available.

Thanks
They are the same.
MX304 is offline  
Old 04-30-2018, 08:12 AM
  #1048  
Tech Master
iTrader: (49)
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Harford Co. Maryland
Posts: 1,414
Trader Rating: 49 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by MX304
They are the same.
I think the plastic on the 6.1 caps is softer than the B6 caps. The bleeder screws strip very easily in the new caps
Just my opinion
Scott R is offline  
Old 04-30-2018, 10:07 AM
  #1049  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Jan 2018
Posts: 23
Default

Originally Posted by Scott R
I think the plastic on the 6.1 caps is softer than the B6 caps. The bleeder screws strip very easily in the new caps
Just my opinion
Well that sucks. The whole reason need new ones is that the some of the bleeder screws are stripped from the previous owner.

Maybe it's worth going aluminum.
McKrakken is offline  
Old 04-30-2018, 10:48 AM
  #1050  
Tech Master
iTrader: (67)
 
BRSracing's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2011
Location: Blue Springs MO
Posts: 1,947
Trader Rating: 67 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by imprsme
For the guys that are saying the car is light. Are you building the kit straight from the box or are you building with Ti screws and other weight saving items.

Because I am not finding the car to be light at all.

I weighed chassis to chassis with my b6.

No tires,battery or body.

Same electronics other than the b6 had. Small fan.

The b6.1 was 60 grams heavier.

My b6 ready to hit the track with both weights under the servo and electronics. WITH 70grams under the battery hits the track at 1551 grams.

My b6.1 same weights minus the 70grams under the battery and it was 1620.

I can see where guys may be seeing it as “light” since the new car comes with a light weight body where other kits didn’t.

Thats why I weighed just chassis vs chassis.

Other than that the car is pretty good. Made a few changes to suit me and my track. But was able to TQ and get a win on the first day out.


Also another problem I noticed.

While running JConcepts Pindowns in the rear the tires are hitting the wing causing a lot of inconsistency.
I did cut out some “relief” area in the wing and that helped.

Just wondering if anyone else saw this problem.
my car all electronics race ready with regular body is 1509. running a fan full size battery etc.
BRSracing is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.