Tamiya TRF417
#872
This thread is getting
#873
Tech Regular
iTrader: (20)
Sorry didn't know it was a closed forum.............even though I know Adam and his passion for his Tamiya cars and his passion to actually get some factory support. either States side or other.
Guess if your not looking at every car out there and their development of parts and just bury your head in the sand looking at only one car, you'll soon be on the outside looking in. You should maybe give Mark a scolding for trying the Awesomatic car out after that race too.
Guess if your not looking at every car out there and their development of parts and just bury your head in the sand looking at only one car, you'll soon be on the outside looking in. You should maybe give Mark a scolding for trying the Awesomatic car out after that race too.
Adam - Please PM me with any questions you have, I will do everything possible to help you and this forum the best I can.
#874
I have the TRF416X with Lipo chassis from Tamiya as well as TRF417. Doing a side-by-side comparison, the TRF416X allows more chassis flex due to thinner upper deck and split center pulley blocks, in addition I also use the split suspension blocks.
The TITC track is extremely high grip and pretty large, so chassis flex is very much desired. I think the original TRF417 is stiffer than the TRF416X with Lipo chassis, but less than the original TRF416X.
Probably there will be optional upper deck in the work to tune the chassis flex.
Try to use the split suspension blocks to see if it helps.
The TITC track is extremely high grip and pretty large, so chassis flex is very much desired. I think the original TRF417 is stiffer than the TRF416X with Lipo chassis, but less than the original TRF416X.
Probably there will be optional upper deck in the work to tune the chassis flex.
Try to use the split suspension blocks to see if it helps.
Very interesting post. Some guys who switched to the 417 said they felt the 416X lipo car had more traction. And one very fast guy preferred the original 416X with nimh cut outs on high grip carpet
I think I'm gonna fabricate my own plate, its been on my mind for ages. Couldn't be bothered before (I have a professional workshop and all the tools, that's why I can't be bothered). 2mm but I want decent lipo retainers unlike the Smokem FX . And cut perfectly symmetrical
Just curious. It is RcTech after all !
#875
Very interesting post. Some guys who switched to the 417 said they felt the 416X lipo car had more traction. And one very fast guy preferred the original 416X with nimh cut outs on high grip carpet
I think I'm gonna fabricate my own plate, its been on my mind for ages. Couldn't be bothered before (I have a professional workshop and all the tools, that's why I can't be bothered). 2mm but I want decent lipo retainers unlike the Smokem FX . And cut perfectly symmetrical
Just curious. It is RcTech after all !
I think I'm gonna fabricate my own plate, its been on my mind for ages. Couldn't be bothered before (I have a professional workshop and all the tools, that's why I can't be bothered). 2mm but I want decent lipo retainers unlike the Smokem FX . And cut perfectly symmetrical
Just curious. It is RcTech after all !
The original TRF416X chassis is stiffer than the optional lipo chassis, which is why it's a favorite to run on carpet tracks. I run my TRF416X with lipo chassis for carpet and I have to stiffen by adding the steering brace. I still feel some slack when the car is turning due to flexing, even on Cirtix Spec class.
#876
I see, so 416X stiffest, 417, then 416X lipo least stiff, correct?
So far I've found that the car needs stiffening at the front for high grip carpet, but not necessarily at the rear
When I had the T3 I fitted an Exotek chassis, which was much stiffer, and it was awful, spinning out everywhere. Perhaps the set up needs to be changed also when changing the stiffness
So far I've found that the car needs stiffening at the front for high grip carpet, but not necessarily at the rear
When I had the T3 I fitted an Exotek chassis, which was much stiffer, and it was awful, spinning out everywhere. Perhaps the set up needs to be changed also when changing the stiffness
#879
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
Chassis stiffening
Couldn't you stiffen the front end using the holes located at the steering brace and upper deck? I wondering if there will be a aluminum option part to join the upper deck and steering together. Also why is one side of the steering brace counter sunk?
Cheers.
Cheers.
#880
do you guys using x-ray servo saver?? do i need any modification on it??
#881
I think TRF417 is better out-of-the-box for high grip carpet racing because it's stiffer. Look at how Jilles won the Snowbirds in January.
The original TRF416X chassis is stiffer than the optional lipo chassis, which is why it's a favorite to run on carpet tracks. I run my TRF416X with lipo chassis for carpet and I have to stiffen by adding the steering brace. I still feel some slack when the car is turning due to flexing, even on Cirtix Spec class.
The original TRF416X chassis is stiffer than the optional lipo chassis, which is why it's a favorite to run on carpet tracks. I run my TRF416X with lipo chassis for carpet and I have to stiffen by adding the steering brace. I still feel some slack when the car is turning due to flexing, even on Cirtix Spec class.
Raised front roll centre to 1mm under blocks, further smoothing out the steering
Fitted the steering brace. This made a massive difference, car super smooth and consistent, yet it still had initial turn in. Great !
Finally to get more initial turn in I laid down the rear shocks one hole and the car was right on the money. Best I ever had the car, by far.
TQ and fastest lap at local club on old worn out Sorex's
#882
Took your comments on board. Used the 416 lipo bottom deck but with 416X top deck, which is considerably stiffer than the lipo top deck
Raised front roll centre to 1mm under blocks, further smoothing out the steering
Fitted the steering brace. This made a massive difference, car super smooth and consistent, yet it still had initial turn in. Great !
Finally to get more initial turn in I laid down the rear shocks one hole and the car was right on the money. Best I ever had the car, by far.
TQ and fastest lap at local club on old worn out Sorex's
Raised front roll centre to 1mm under blocks, further smoothing out the steering
Fitted the steering brace. This made a massive difference, car super smooth and consistent, yet it still had initial turn in. Great !
Finally to get more initial turn in I laid down the rear shocks one hole and the car was right on the money. Best I ever had the car, by far.
TQ and fastest lap at local club on old worn out Sorex's
#884
Tech Rookie
Is this the best for drifting..
trf417 does it good for drifting or touring?
#885
Tech Rookie
How much the price for this chasis..
could anybody tell me how much the price for this trf417.. and where can i buy online which website the best price for new buyer like me?