Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Awesomatix EP Touring Car (A700 Shaft Drive) >

Awesomatix EP Touring Car (A700 Shaft Drive)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree143Likes

Awesomatix EP Touring Car (A700 Shaft Drive)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-06-2016, 10:21 PM
  #9106  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (315)
 
nexxus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 8,947
Trader Rating: 315 (100%+)
Default

It depends on the motor, and what motor layout, the transverse layout was very noisy. A lot of noise can come if the centre driveshaft is slightly loose, and vibrates.
nexxus is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 12:00 AM
  #9107  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (32)
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 910
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by hobbs
Thanks.

I am still in the process of learning this kit.

Next question
Motor mount flex which allows us to set mode 1, 2, 3, 4.
What is the effect of each mode??? What most use for 17.5T blinky class??

Then the piece of am69, why we need it in mode 3 & 4 only?? What is its effect??

Thanks.
Advice, plz....
hobbs is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 03:34 AM
  #9108  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (28)
 
hanulec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: @ the post office
Posts: 10,278
Trader Rating: 28 (100%+)
Default

Mode 3
Throw out the am69
hanulec is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 05:55 PM
  #9109  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (315)
 
nexxus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 8,947
Trader Rating: 315 (100%+)
Exclamation

Well after reading 500 pages of this and the A800 thread, every article on Awesomatix USA and Petitrc I have come up with what looks to me like a workable starting point for a low-medium grip Outdoor Asphalt mixed track which we run at.

(1/8 Pan car laps around 14 seconds, 1/10 Mod 16-17 and 21.5 around 21)

Would greatly appreciate any and all feedback and suggestions particularly from the resident Awesomatix gurus.
Attached Thumbnails Awesomatix EP Touring Car (A700 Shaft Drive)-arcmccsetup1.jpg  
nexxus is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 06:21 PM
  #9110  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
 
EDWARD2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 2,200
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Looks good, however, is there a reason you are running 1.5 and 2.75 mm shim on the rear inner links?

I would also look at going softer on the front and rear dampers.

Also look at running 1 million in the front differential.
EDWARD2003 is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 06:30 PM
  #9111  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (315)
 
nexxus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 8,947
Trader Rating: 315 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by EDWARD2003
Looks good, however, is there a reason you are running 1.5 and 2.75 mm shim on the rear inner links?

I would also look at going softer on the front and rear dampers.

Also look at running 1 million in the front differential.
Softer than what I have? It feels pretty soft as it is, and I don't have sway bars on?

On the rear shims I was under the impression it is like having rear kick up, which is what I always used to run on the T4, should I go down to 1.5 front and back or up to 2.75?

As for the front diff, good idea, I will also try with a spool.
nexxus is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 07:05 PM
  #9112  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
 
EDWARD2003's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Tokyo, Japan
Posts: 2,200
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

The terminology for kick-up and anti-dive applies to the front end and anti-squat refers to the rear.

As for what your trying to achieve. I assume you want to run anti-squat? If so, you want to run a shim under the lower suspension arm which will produce positive anti-squat. This will reduce the amount the car will squat under acceleration and give more steering on and off power.

negative anti-squat is the opposite
EDWARD2003 is offline  
Old 01-07-2016, 07:29 PM
  #9113  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (72)
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 783
Trader Rating: 72 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by nexxus
...with the lack of action here I almost feel like I should "have" the A800 but ...
For whatever it's worth, following is a grain of salt from me.

Those who have an A700-series chassis like me need not abandon ship.

No slight intended to the A800, which surely will be fantastic. However, my first experience in Mod TC with my new A800 is not on par with the first experience I had in Mod TC with my A700-series.

I'm significantly faster and more consistent with my trusty A700-series. Granted, there are many factors involved in these things but, at the moment, my A700-series wins over my A800.

So, for me, the jury has not returned a verdict. The A700-series chassis is a cutting edge touring car chassis and excellent alternative for all classes.

The A700 is still a fantastic chassis and, in my humble opinion, will remain so.
waswadener is offline  
Old 01-09-2016, 04:03 PM
  #9114  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (72)
 
ZeroDown7169's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2012
Location: ND
Posts: 300
Trader Rating: 72 (100%+)
Default

I've been hearing about this bearing mod, and all I can find is to put a bearing on the ffg. Is that all it is or is there something more to it? Also I was looking at getting a raceberry chassis, are they worth it and where can I find them for the 700 series cars?
Thanks
ZeroDown7169 is offline  
Old 01-09-2016, 09:40 PM
  #9115  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (315)
 
nexxus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2005
Location: Perth, Australia
Posts: 8,947
Trader Rating: 315 (100%+)
Default

So ran with my set up last night after changing both to 1. 5mm spacers on the back, car having issues for front grip (scrubbing) so changing front camber to 1 degree out helped (from 1.5) had silly little issues, servo came loose in a crash, and then all through the finals the back left kept binding up which played havoc with the handling, couldn't address it at the track but still managed the fastest lap time of the day despite the issues. Car does still understeer off power though. Found some scoring on the shock holder but no idea how it would have happened or why the back left is binding up, arms are free, cvd's are fine shock is smooth so puzzled.
Attached Thumbnails Awesomatix EP Touring Car (A700 Shaft Drive)-img_3926.jpg  
nexxus is offline  
Old 01-15-2016, 06:37 AM
  #9116  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (32)
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Posts: 910
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

Refer to the motor mount 2 (mm2) build instruction, the diagram shows only 3 out of 5 screw holes are used when mounting the bulkhead onto chassis plate.

Is this right or just printing error???
hobbs is offline  
Old 01-15-2016, 07:00 AM
  #9117  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (2)
 
daktulos's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Montréal
Posts: 140
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by hobbs
Refer to the motor mount 2 (mm2) build instruction, the diagram shows only 3 out of 5 screw holes are used when mounting the bulkhead onto chassis plate.

Is this right or just printing error???
Completely normal.
It's to add more flex in the rear. I run like that for more than a year without issue. You can try in the front but in my case the car was inconsistent.
To help with the flex you can also remove the center screw for the shock bracket (AM08).
daktulos is offline  
Old 01-18-2016, 01:09 PM
  #9118  
Dan
Tech Champion
iTrader: (75)
 
Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,332
Trader Rating: 75 (100%+)
Default

Anyone have a good starting point recommendation for D2.1 dampers on an Evo1 Carbon chassis for carpet? Mainly damper gap distances. Also running Losi 45wt in them with P45 insert.
Dan is offline  
Old 01-18-2016, 02:34 PM
  #9119  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (28)
 
hanulec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: @ the post office
Posts: 10,278
Trader Rating: 28 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Dan
Anyone have a good starting point recommendation for D2.1 dampers on an Evo1 Carbon chassis for carpet? Mainly damper gap distances. Also running Losi 45wt in them with P45 insert.
Look for any evo2 setup. This will out you in the right direction...
hanulec is offline  
Old 01-18-2016, 06:07 PM
  #9120  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7,762
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

I am A700 for life... Nice to see Awesomatix give all the racers a choice between shaft and belt drive though....
Originally Posted by waswadener
For whatever it's worth, following is a grain of salt from me.

Those who have an A700-series chassis like me need not abandon ship.

No slight intended to the A800, which surely will be fantastic. However, my first experience in Mod TC with my new A800 is not on par with the first experience I had in Mod TC with my A700-series.

I'm significantly faster and more consistent with my trusty A700-series. Granted, there are many factors involved in these things but, at the moment, my A700-series wins over my A800.

So, for me, the jury has not returned a verdict. The A700-series chassis is a cutting edge touring car chassis and excellent alternative for all classes.

The A700 is still a fantastic chassis and, in my humble opinion, will remain so.
bertrandsv87 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.