Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Tamiya TA05 Touring Sedan >

Tamiya TA05 Touring Sedan

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree68Likes

Tamiya TA05 Touring Sedan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-24-2015, 04:16 PM
  #11326  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 94
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Raman
No. He is referring to rear only. XA-D will give you 2.5 toe in on rear, XA-E 3.0, F 3.5

On front the kit comes with A/A. You can increase front width by going to B/B or C/C. The wider the front the calmer the steering.. Too wide will make it numb.

You can go B/C or C/D in front .. That creates arm sweep which is good for tracks with tight corners. For initial set up, I would avoid the sweep set up.
for the front when you say B/C is B the outside and C is inside? resulting in -.5 degrees
Autostrada048 is offline  
Old 06-25-2015, 11:32 AM
  #11327  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (94)
 
Raman's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Las Vegas
Posts: 5,350
Trader Rating: 94 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Autostrada048
for the front when you say B/C is B the outside and C is inside? resulting in -.5 degrees
No the other way.. C block on outer front and B block on inner front. This creates 0,5 toe out and as the front arm compresses it sweeps up and in, versus being linear on C/C blocks.
Raman is offline  
Old 06-30-2015, 07:15 AM
  #11328  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 94
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

OK that makes much more sense now. I have the same setup on my trf417 and I'll most likely set it up the same as my raceberry 417.

I wish Tamiya made 20t center pulleys to make the IDR 1.85. Does anyone use the 3racing Sakura gears to acheive this?
Autostrada048 is offline  
Old 06-30-2015, 07:15 AM
  #11329  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 94
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Double post
Autostrada048 is offline  
Old 06-30-2015, 07:19 AM
  #11330  
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 94
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Double post
Autostrada048 is offline  
Old 07-18-2015, 03:59 PM
  #11331  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (38)
 
SagadSetup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Hilagang-Silangan, Estados Unidos
Posts: 2,917
Trader Rating: 38 (100%+)
Default To IFS or not to IFS?

Guys,

I'm currently building a TA05 V2 chassis.

Should I go IFS or not and why?

Regards!
SagadSetup is offline  
Old 07-19-2015, 02:42 PM
  #11332  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (68)
 
ThePanda's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Michigan
Posts: 7,201
Trader Rating: 68 (100%+)
Default

besides looking cooler and allowing low nose bodies there isn't really a reason to.
ThePanda is offline  
Old 07-19-2015, 07:24 PM
  #11333  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (38)
 
SagadSetup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Hilagang-Silangan, Estados Unidos
Posts: 2,917
Trader Rating: 38 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by ThePanda
besides looking cooler and allowing low nose bodies there isn't really a reason to.
As of now, I am building my car for upright configuration. But I do have parts for IFS setup.

How about in terms of performance? Is there a difference in IFS as opposed to standups?
SagadSetup is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 07:57 AM
  #11334  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (15)
 
tobyzhang's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2011
Location: chino hills/Irvine
Posts: 655
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by SagadSetup
As of now, I am building my car for upright configuration. But I do have parts for IFS setup.

How about in terms of performance? Is there a difference in IFS as opposed to standups?
not much difference. IFS is only very slightly slower responding due to the extra linkage play in the system but nothing major for me.
tobyzhang is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 08:04 AM
  #11335  
OVA
Tech Lord
iTrader: (86)
 
OVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: WASHINGTON
Posts: 10,307
Trader Rating: 86 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by SagadSetup
As of now, I am building my car for upright configuration. But I do have parts for IFS setup.

How about in terms of performance? Is there a difference in IFS as opposed to standups?
If you have a track that has the short and fast S transition ,the up right shock tower is better than IFS.The IFS works but a little lazy compare the UP Right shock tower...
OVA is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 08:19 AM
  #11336  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (38)
 
SagadSetup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Hilagang-Silangan, Estados Unidos
Posts: 2,917
Trader Rating: 38 (100%+)
Default

Since I think I have enough parts from before, I'm building an IFS for display and an upright for a runner. I still believe that the TA05 platform is a formidable intermediate touring car from Tamiya.

Last edited by SagadSetup; 07-20-2015 at 08:29 AM.
SagadSetup is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 08:38 AM
  #11337  
Tech Champion
 
tc3team's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 6,151
Default

Originally Posted by SagadSetup
I still believe that the TA05 platform is a formidable intermediate touring car from Tamiya.
With Alloy toe blocks and better (TRF or equivalent) shocks, it is still one of the most competitive and durable kits Tamiya have released imo.

It may be an older style chassis which is not so lipo designed/friendly but still a very good chassis for how much you can get them for now.

It will never be a TRF, but it is no where near the cost of a TRF chassis either!
tc3team is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 08:43 AM
  #11338  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (38)
 
SagadSetup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Hilagang-Silangan, Estados Unidos
Posts: 2,917
Trader Rating: 38 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by tc3team
With Alloy toe blocks and better (TRF or equivalent) shocks, it is still one of the most competitive and durable kits Tamiya have released imo.

It may be an older style chassis which is not so lipo designed/friendly but still a very good chassis for how much you can get them for now.

It will never be a TRF, but it is no where near the cost of a TRF chassis either!
Yes. I love the simplicity of it's design, the equal belts, and the third party support for hop-ups. Still very abundant!

Here's my current setup with the discontinued EX05 Lipo chassis. Still a performer!
Attached Thumbnails Tamiya TA05 Touring Sedan-user197765_pic31405_1436985779.jpg  
SagadSetup is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 08:53 AM
  #11339  
Tech Champion
 
tc3team's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: UK
Posts: 6,151
Default

Originally Posted by SagadSetup
Yes. I love the simplicity of it's design, the equal belts, and the third party support for hop-ups. Still very abundant!

Here's my current setup with the discontinued EX05 Lipo chassis. Still a performer!
Indeed, still very abundant A nice chassis in any guise, even the tub chassis is good for protecting the electronics, albeit a little flexible.

I have the graphite (silver woven look) 3racing twin deck chassis and shock mounts version of the TA05 with trf shocks, lightened pulley and I have a spool/one way for it somewhere too iirc.

My car is featured here: http://www.fusionhobbies.com/blog-ar...led-car-racing

It has not been used for a while as I have a T4 '13 but in time I will either be sad to see it go, or let it gather more dust until my sons are old enough to use and (try to) abuse it

Then, before the T4 '13, I moved up to a trf415msxx which I reviewed here:

http://www.fusionhobbies.com/blog-ar...415msxx-review
tc3team is offline  
Old 07-20-2015, 09:01 AM
  #11340  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (38)
 
SagadSetup's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Hilagang-Silangan, Estados Unidos
Posts: 2,917
Trader Rating: 38 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by tc3team
Indeed, still very abundant A nice chassis in any guise, even the tub chassis is good for protecting the electronics, albeit a little flexible.

I have the graphite (silver woven look) 3racing twin deck chassis and shock mounts version of the TA05 with trf shocks, lightened pulley and I have a spool/one way for it somewhere too iirc.

My car is featured here: http://www.fusionhobbies.com/blog-ar...led-car-racing

It has not been used for a while as I have a T4 '13 but in time I will either be sad to see it go, or let it gather more dust until my sons are old enough to use and (try to) abuse it

Then, before the T4 '13, I moved up to a trf415msxx which I reviewed here:

http://www.fusionhobbies.com/blog-ar...415msxx-review
I like your TA05! Looks lovely.

I have a TRF car but somehow and I don't know why, I still enjoy driving my TA05 than any other chassis.

Nothing like it.

I am also a proud owner of the 30th anniversary TA05. of which I have no intention of using nor selling.
Attached Thumbnails Tamiya TA05 Touring Sedan-30th-ta05-2-.jpg   Tamiya TA05 Touring Sedan-30th-ta05-1-.jpg  
SagadSetup is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.