Yokomo GT-4 Thread
#781
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (47)
Originally posted by Manticore
power is what you need for GP. i would give up the little weight and use a 9451 for steering. 9550 for throttle.
power is what you need for GP. i would give up the little weight and use a 9451 for steering. 9550 for throttle.
#782
Originally posted by Randman
I've had good luck with the 9550 for steering in my ep, seems to have plenty of power... If it doesnt work right, I'll just switch, I have the 9451 for throttle now.
I've had good luck with the 9550 for steering in my ep, seems to have plenty of power... If it doesnt work right, I'll just switch, I have the 9451 for throttle now.
#783
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (47)
Originally posted by Manticore
9550 still work but i think its power is a bit marginal. steering drag is much different between rubber tire and foam tire due to different traction. Holding power of steering servo plays very important role on consistent cornering.
9550 still work but i think its power is a bit marginal. steering drag is much different between rubber tire and foam tire due to different traction. Holding power of steering servo plays very important role on consistent cornering.
#784
Tech Champion
iTrader: (8)
Thanks, it was nice meeting you too, Francis. I guess I still have some catch up to do to compete with you guys.
I plan to make Rev my home track, so you will be seeing a lot of more of me.
Randman, I run 45f 42r and it runs good, although I was still on the verge of traction rolling on sunday. I have tried the same shore all the way around and it just doesnt work for me, too much steering.
Thanks,
Steven Muller
MPP Palmaris Racing Team.
I plan to make Rev my home track, so you will be seeing a lot of more of me.
Randman, I run 45f 42r and it runs good, although I was still on the verge of traction rolling on sunday. I have tried the same shore all the way around and it just doesnt work for me, too much steering.
Thanks,
Steven Muller
MPP Palmaris Racing Team.
#785
Originally posted by Randman
Well I'll give it a shot, bought it to be low cg, if it doesnt work, I'll switch the servos, or buy another S9451.
Well I'll give it a shot, bought it to be low cg, if it doesnt work, I'll switch the servos, or buy another S9451.
#787
Originally posted by Randman
Works great in my SD... I'll give results with the GT4 when I know em
Works great in my SD... I'll give results with the GT4 when I know em
#789
Originally posted by Randman
You know I will... but I wont be running GP until the middle of the month or so, gotta practice for the carpet champs
You know I will... but I wont be running GP until the middle of the month or so, gotta practice for the carpet champs
#791
Originally posted by Randman
Why not use a 9451 for throttle as well? It'll have more weight lower, so it'll only help
Why not use a 9451 for throttle as well? It'll have more weight lower, so it'll only help
#792
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (47)
Originally posted by Manticore
i find out i dont use as much brake as the others do so i dont need a high torque servo for throttle. besides, it does look nice with a smaller throttle servo there !
i find out i dont use as much brake as the others do so i dont need a high torque servo for throttle. besides, it does look nice with a smaller throttle servo there !
I run 1 way diffs even on the tightest track layout..
#793
Originally posted by Randman
I would propably be able to drive the car fine if I didn't even hook up the break linkage and just had throttle, lol.
I run 1 way diffs even on the tightest track layout..
I would propably be able to drive the car fine if I didn't even hook up the break linkage and just had throttle, lol.
I run 1 way diffs even on the tightest track layout..
#795
Originally posted by Randman
Well hopefully I can race on that track firsthand this summer
Well hopefully I can race on that track firsthand this summer