Serpent 710
#1921
Originally posted by Julius
Be sure to check if you have the same amount of steering left and right without a big difference in your transmitter. Normally this is the case with the servo horn at 90 degrees to the servo.
Be sure to check if you have the same amount of steering left and right without a big difference in your transmitter. Normally this is the case with the servo horn at 90 degrees to the servo.
Original the ballcup couldn't pass the servo horn because the horn had to pull the ballcup passed the centre of the metal servoconnetion. Now with horn not at 90 degrees with the servo but with the lever this is smaller.
#1922
From some of the pics so far the car look good.
Julius,show us some pics of your "team car" !!!
Julius,show us some pics of your "team car" !!!
#1923
Originally posted by EVOLUTION
From some of the pics so far the car look good.
Julius,show us some pics of your "team car" !!!
From some of the pics so far the car look good.
Julius,show us some pics of your "team car" !!!
#1924
Originally posted by Julius
I could show you, but then I'd have to kill you
I could show you, but then I'd have to kill you
#1925
Tech Adept
dropped into Snake King's in Mong Kok yesterday and saw a 710 built up. He said he sold around 30-something already and only had one left. Looked so purdy and felt so good in my hands I almost bought it and here was I only looking for some small bits for my ntc3. This car is s-c-a-r-y!
#1926
Originally posted by one-nil
dropped into Snake King's in Mong Kok yesterday and saw a 710 built up. He said he sold around 30-something already and only had one left. Looked so purdy and felt so good in my hands I almost bought it and here was I only looking for some small bits for my ntc3. This car is s-c-a-r-y!
dropped into Snake King's in Mong Kok yesterday and saw a 710 built up. He said he sold around 30-something already and only had one left. Looked so purdy and felt so good in my hands I almost bought it and here was I only looking for some small bits for my ntc3. This car is s-c-a-r-y!
Just throw away that piece of j**k
#1927
Originally posted by S710_Nut
The S9550 is digital too go with the 3PK HRS?
The S9550 is digital too go with the 3PK HRS?
#1928
Originally posted by S710_Nut
The S9550 is digital too go with the 3PK HRS?
The S9550 is digital too go with the 3PK HRS?
#1929
Tech Fanatic
Originally posted by mugenracer
has anyone ran this car? how dose it perform?
has anyone ran this car? how dose it perform?
I still managed to finish second in our local Sunday race (A main 45 minutes). (believe me that i was only the lucky one, the other fast guy did not make it through finish)
After spending 1 gallon with this car, this is what I found:
- So exciting, coz there are so much "kungfu inside" this car that waits to be discovered.
- Rene/Julius/... was right. the car seems so light to drive. About acceleration, i was competing with other cars that equipped with 7.3~7.6 1st gear ratio and I almost forgot that im only using stock gear ratio.
- Im not sure wether stronger material or better constrution, but this snake handling does not change after having some T-boned and couple of airshow.
- Handling balance is very well, tire wears after 45 min is almost the same.(same shore, no split for start).
Im not giving my setup, coz Im not so sure yet.
I do notes : highest position of upper front arm ; upper position of lower rear arm and shortest position for upper rear arm is a good starting point to make a balance setup in small tight track.
For those whom hates serpent, my advice (wise one) ; just go buy and drive this car you will improving your setup skill and knowledge by reading the setup book and apply to your car.
Then sell them again if you dont like it, you wont feel regret with the knowledge youve got.
For serpent die hard who drive 705 with modded front arm, changing the upper front arm position to hiighest will makes a same feeling with make a new hole in 705. Except the outside camber did not change when the car is leaning, which is better cornering when you slam your car into a hairpin.
Look forward to hear any other input from you guys...
#1930
Originally posted by Schrijver99
Is anybody using Futaba servo's:
I can't get the steering servo right; i have more travel steering left than right and also the link from the servo to the servo saver almost touches the front belt! Is this because Serpent only drives Sanwa?
Is anybody using Futaba servo's:
I can't get the steering servo right; i have more travel steering left than right and also the link from the servo to the servo saver almost touches the front belt! Is this because Serpent only drives Sanwa?
#1931
Originally posted by pineapplet
Hmm.. speaking of fraying... Does serpent graphite require superglue or epoxy arnd the edges to make it long lasting??? (.. InitialD : sURely you're prepared to do this as well!! )
Hmm.. speaking of fraying... Does serpent graphite require superglue or epoxy arnd the edges to make it long lasting??? (.. InitialD : sURely you're prepared to do this as well!! )
Originally posted by pineapplet
And oh yah, just thought i'd say this as well: I can finally put my favorite rims - Speedmind foamies - on a Serpent car!! Hah hah!! (okok.. i could do this with the LC conversion previously.. but that was just insanely expensive! )
And oh yah, just thought i'd say this as well: I can finally put my favorite rims - Speedmind foamies - on a Serpent car!! Hah hah!! (okok.. i could do this with the LC conversion previously.. but that was just insanely expensive! )
#1932
Originally posted by Schrijver99
Original the ballcup couldn't pass the servo horn because the horn had to pull the ballcup passed the centre of the metal servoconnetion. Now with horn not at 90 degrees with the servo but with the lever this is smaller.
Original the ballcup couldn't pass the servo horn because the horn had to pull the ballcup passed the centre of the metal servoconnetion. Now with horn not at 90 degrees with the servo but with the lever this is smaller.
BTW, what linkage and ball cups did you use? It seems it is quite impossible to get to 40 mm even though you trim the ball cups...
#1933
Tech Fanatic
Originally posted by InitialD
BTW, what linkage and ball cups did you use? It seems it is quite impossible to get to 40 mm even though you trim the ball cups...
BTW, what linkage and ball cups did you use? It seems it is quite impossible to get to 40 mm even though you trim the ball cups...
But I will replace it with serpent shock lower ball end.
Just lign the ackerman arm to pointing 0 deg. and your EPA diff will not more than 5 point. If you force to lign the horn 90 deg. , you will ended up with 32 point EPA difference and right turning is still can not be maximal .Like I said in my first post regarding this issue.
And you still need to put 1mm spacer in horn linkage, 2mm will touching the belt.
#1934
Originally posted by InitialD
Let me get this straight... To get the steering the same left and right, you need to shorten the linkage to 40 mm and then the servo horn at 90 degree to the linkage and not 90 degree to the servo casing?
BTW, what linkage and ball cups did you use? It seems it is quite impossible to get to 40 mm even though you trim the ball cups...
Let me get this straight... To get the steering the same left and right, you need to shorten the linkage to 40 mm and then the servo horn at 90 degree to the linkage and not 90 degree to the servo casing?
BTW, what linkage and ball cups did you use? It seems it is quite impossible to get to 40 mm even though you trim the ball cups...
Last edited by Julius; 12-22-2003 at 01:35 AM.
#1935
Originally posted by GoldFinger
If your track is only 46x22mm and 2.8-3.5 Mtr infield widht, I must admit it that it was not so impressing. Considering that my kit is being RTR on Friday and like Pyramid said that still very very much new things and combinations that we should try.
I still managed to finish second in our local Sunday race (A main 45 minutes). (believe me that i was only the lucky one, the other fast guy did not make it through finish)
After spending 1 gallon with this car, this is what I found:
- So exciting, coz there are so much "kungfu inside" this car that waits to be discovered.
- Rene/Julius/... was right. the car seems so light to drive. About acceleration, i was competing with other cars that equipped with 7.3~7.6 1st gear ratio and I almost forgot that im only using stock gear ratio.
- Im not sure wether stronger material or better constrution, but this snake handling does not change after having some T-boned and couple of airshow.
- Handling balance is very well, tire wears after 45 min is almost the same.(same shore, no split for start).
Im not giving my setup, coz Im not so sure yet.
I do notes : highest position of upper front arm ; upper position of lower rear arm and shortest position for upper rear arm is a good starting point to make a balance setup in small tight track.
If your track is only 46x22mm and 2.8-3.5 Mtr infield widht, I must admit it that it was not so impressing. Considering that my kit is being RTR on Friday and like Pyramid said that still very very much new things and combinations that we should try.
I still managed to finish second in our local Sunday race (A main 45 minutes). (believe me that i was only the lucky one, the other fast guy did not make it through finish)
After spending 1 gallon with this car, this is what I found:
- So exciting, coz there are so much "kungfu inside" this car that waits to be discovered.
- Rene/Julius/... was right. the car seems so light to drive. About acceleration, i was competing with other cars that equipped with 7.3~7.6 1st gear ratio and I almost forgot that im only using stock gear ratio.
- Im not sure wether stronger material or better constrution, but this snake handling does not change after having some T-boned and couple of airshow.
- Handling balance is very well, tire wears after 45 min is almost the same.(same shore, no split for start).
Im not giving my setup, coz Im not so sure yet.
I do notes : highest position of upper front arm ; upper position of lower rear arm and shortest position for upper rear arm is a good starting point to make a balance setup in small tight track.
Considering the tire wear and the balanced feel, I think you might try:
- one step softer front tires (even better wear balance fr/rr and more steering)
- Stiffer damping (35wt) or the shocks a little more upright which gives a stiffer spring ratio and stiffer damping = quicker response.
- Try the DRS link in the upper position =helps steer the rear a little more. (you may need the longer upper link position to keep balance out of the turns)
Did you run against cars with a front diff? How was the braking into the hairpins. How is the overall feeling compared with the 705?