Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Losi 1/10 TEN-SCTE ARR 4x4 Short Course Truck Thread >

Losi 1/10 TEN-SCTE ARR 4x4 Short Course Truck Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree9Likes

Losi 1/10 TEN-SCTE ARR 4x4 Short Course Truck Thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-16-2011, 06:55 PM
  #17446  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (45)
 
goehm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,765
Trader Rating: 45 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Cement head
I drive my truck the way it was designed, by professionals who spent hours upon hours of r&d and came up with a very good design that works right out of the box. Don't get me wrong I do have a TLR chassis on order because part of the hobby is hop ups and I do like the bling of new pieces, but I think the truck was build a bit heavier than the competion because it siMply makes the truck better in all aspects.
I don't think the truck was built heavier for the sake of being heavier. If Ryan or Casper say otherwise, I will apologize and fly out and wash/wax their cars. There simply isn't a single performance benefit for a vehicle to be heavier right out of the box. If the truck needs weight for handling purposes, then ideally it's better to start with a lighter stock weight and add weight where you need it. If it needs more weight to make other trucks bounce off, you're better off adding weight at a lower CG.

I think with just a little research you'll see the foundation of the SCTE is the 810 which is an 1/8 scale buggy. Naturally those parts are a bit beefier and such, and will weigh more. From a commercial standpoint, it's simply a good idea to retain as much off-the-shelf product in vehicles where applicable to keep costs down. It then gives racers the option of buying upgrade parts where they think it's needed. With that design, it's a win for Losi and really a win for the customer (IE: people who don't want a $30 part will make due with the stock part, those that want to upgrade can, and there is profit in each transaction).

I think saying that keeping the truck beefy as a performance consideration is a bit of a stretch.

That said - I loved my truck out of the box, and I enjoy finding the things to buy and tinker with on my truck. Now if I just left it stock and spent more time just driving it I'd actually be faster.
goehm is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 06:56 PM
  #17447  
Tech Master
iTrader: (13)
 
Ridley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,460
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by BmainStar
Do notice Ridley quoted me and not you! He is speaking in general terms and many posts of this nature not just yours! Cheers!
Cement Head is living up to his SN
Ridley is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 06:59 PM
  #17448  
Tech Master
iTrader: (13)
 
Ridley's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,460
Trader Rating: 13 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by goehm
I don't think the truck was built heavier for the sake of being heavier. If Ryan or Casper say otherwise, I will apologize and fly out and wash/wax their cars. There simply isn't a single performance benefit for a vehicle to be heavier right out of the box. If the truck needs weight for handling purposes, then ideally it's better to start with a lighter stock weight and add weight where you need it. If it needs more weight to make other trucks bounce off, you're better off adding weight at a lower CG.

I think with just a little research you'll see the foundation of the SCTE is the 810 which is an 1/8 scale buggy. Naturally those parts are a bit beefier and such, and will weigh more. From a commercial standpoint, it's simply a good idea to retain as much off-the-shelf product in vehicles where applicable to keep costs down. It then gives racers the option of buying upgrade parts where they think it's needed. With that design, it's a win for Losi and really a win for the customer (IE: people who don't want a $30 part will make due with the stock part, those that want to upgrade can, and there is profit in each transaction).

I think saying that keeping the truck beefy as a performance consideration is a bit of a stretch.

That said - I loved my truck out of the box, and I enjoy finding the things to buy and tinker with on my truck. Now if I just left it stock and spent more time just driving it I'd actually be faster.
Well said
Ridley is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 07:02 PM
  #17449  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (8)
 
Cement head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The Ocean State
Posts: 166
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Ridley
Cement Head is living up to his SN
Lol yea I missed that one, to many beers!!
Cement head is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 07:04 PM
  #17450  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 381
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by BashemSmashem
Got my fist run in with the BCE chassis and I have to say before I installed it I didnt think I would see/feel any gains in performance but I was quite wrong , the truck feels much more nimble now and more responsive as well . I went back too the stock brace as well cause the BCE chassis doesnt flex as much as the stock chassis did so I dont think the longer RC8 brace is needed .

So IMO the BCE chassis is a good buy and is definitely not just a piece of bling , though I might break out the Mothers polish and go at it and make it really shine .
hey how long did it take to get yours from the day you ordered it? I just ordered mine at my LHS on saturday
LRPO is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 07:08 PM
  #17451  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (8)
 
Cement head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The Ocean State
Posts: 166
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by goehm
I don't think the truck was built heavier for the sake of being heavier. If Ryan or Casper say otherwise, I will apologize and fly out and wash/wax their cars. There simply isn't a single performance benefit for a vehicle to be heavier right out of the box. If the truck needs weight for handling purposes, then ideally it's better to start with a lighter stock weight and add weight where you need it. If it needs more weight to make other trucks bounce off, you're better off adding weight at a lower CG.

I think with just a little research you'll see the foundation of the SCTE is the 810 which is an 1/8 scale buggy. Naturally those parts are a bit beefier and such, and will weigh more. From a commercial standpoint, it's simply a good idea to retain as much off-the-shelf product in vehicles where applicable to keep costs down. It then gives racers the option of buying upgrade parts where they think it's needed. With that design, it's a win for Losi and really a win for the customer (IE: people who don't want a $30 part will make due with the stock part, those that want to upgrade can, and there is profit in each transaction).

I think saying that keeping the truck beefy as a performance consideration is a bit of a stretch.

That said - I loved my truck out of the box, and I enjoy finding the things to buy and tinker with on my truck. Now if I just left it stock and spent more time just driving it I'd actually be faster.
This is a post by a gentlemen, very well thought out and well said. I here your point, but there is a link somewhere in this vast Internet that has a Losi driver say the truck was built heavy with purpose I saw it a while ago like when the truck was first released, could have been just a sales pitch though.
Cement head is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 07:23 PM
  #17452  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (45)
 
goehm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,765
Trader Rating: 45 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Cement head
This is a post by a gentlemen, very well thought out and well said. I here your point, but there is a link somewhere in this vast Internet that has a Losi driver say the truck was built heavy with purpose I saw it a while ago like when the truck was first released, could have been just a sales pitch though.
I won't dispute that you read that. However, my recollection was such that drivers were saying that the weight really made it drive well.

Also consider that all the optional hopup parts are lighter. The one exception might be the Losi TEN aluminum shock caps which were heavier than stock. Except they didn't work as well as the plastic kit ones, but looked a heck of a lot nicer!
goehm is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 07:25 PM
  #17453  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (45)
 
goehm's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: Northern VA
Posts: 2,765
Trader Rating: 45 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Cement head
I know 4 inches of rain here yesterday!!!
Please tell me you used a rain gauge to measure that water depth.

(Sorry, I had to include something to prevent people from thinking I was mature!)
goehm is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 07:32 PM
  #17454  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (8)
 
Cement head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The Ocean State
Posts: 166
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by goehm
Please tell me you used a rain gauge to measure that water depth.

(Sorry, I had to include something to prevent people from thinking I was mature!)
No the weather man told me that, that's like believing everything you read here.
Lol!
Cement head is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 07:40 PM
  #17455  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (42)
 
Asharus's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Long Island, NY
Posts: 3,123
Trader Rating: 42 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by goehm
I won't dispute that you read that. However, my recollection was such that drivers were saying that the weight really made it drive well.

Also consider that all the optional hopup parts are lighter. The one exception might be the Losi TEN aluminum shock caps which were heavier than stock. Except they didn't work as well as the plastic kit ones, but looked a heck of a lot nicer!
I think the aluminum chassis braces are heavier too
Asharus is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 07:49 PM
  #17456  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (58)
 
8ight-e's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2009
Posts: 4,175
Trader Rating: 58 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Casper
Ryan Dunford and Keith Whisler are supposed to be there for that race!
Do they do any qualifying on Sunday or just the mains? I was wondering if it would be possible to race just one day for this race and just deal with only 1 qual round, as I cannot make it down for both days? Anyone?
8ight-e is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 07:57 PM
  #17457  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (8)
 
Cement head's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: The Ocean State
Posts: 166
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by 8ight-e
Do they do any qualifying on Sunday or just the mains? I was wondering if it would be possible to race just one day for this race and just deal with only 1 qual round, as I cannot make it down for both days? Anyone?
Check the RC Madness forums I didn't see anything in the flyer about qualifying and how it breaks down, although most trophy races have one round of qualifying on Sunday.
Cement head is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 08:13 PM
  #17458  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (9)
 
jmc23's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Whitesboro N.Y.
Posts: 302
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default rc madness

Originally Posted by Casper
Ryan Dunford and Keith Whisler are supposed to be there for that race!
ill be going.....
jmc23 is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 08:14 PM
  #17459  
Tech Master
iTrader: (37)
 
Mr.juarez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Posts: 1,280
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by BashemSmashem
Got my fist run in with the BCE chassis and I have to say before I installed it I didnt think I would see/feel any gains in performance but I was quite wrong , the truck feels much more nimble now and more responsive as well . I went back too the stock brace as well cause the BCE chassis doesnt flex as much as the stock chassis did so I dont think the longer RC8 brace is needed .

So IMO the BCE chassis is a good buy and is definitely not just a piece of bling , though I might break out the Mothers polish and go at it and make it really shine .
i already beat you to it im glad you like that "piece of bling kid"




Originally Posted by Ridley
As for the AE argument...that thing is a complete pile. I don't think adding weight, loosing weight, or anything along those lines will help that truck. The only cure for it's ill's is to strap a Losi under the AE body and call it a day.
josh i dont really go to the sc10 thread but from what i have seen my buddy has had 0 issues with his. no leaky diffs, his out drives are just as new, still on his first belt since he bought it new 2 months ago and hes still on the factory towers. with that said i cant said the same about mine. leaky diffs, taco'd towers and 4 axles and 2 center drivelines. we both have the 1410 and mmp. Not saying i want one, but i keep hearing its chitz this and that and honestly from the ones ive seen they have no issues at all.

Originally Posted by Ridley
Cement Head is living up to his SN
Originally Posted by goehm
Please tell me you used a rain gauge to measure that water depth.

(Sorry, I had to include something to prevent people from thinking I was mature!)
Mr.juarez is offline  
Old 08-16-2011, 08:23 PM
  #17460  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
godofcable's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: Spring Hill Fl
Posts: 2,022
Trader Rating: 37 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Casper
Ryan Dunford and Keith Whisler are supposed to be there for that race!
shameless plug time...

if they want to stretch their legs in New England before that race...this weekend (8/20-8/21) in Rome NY at CRC Raceway is their annual "Dash-for-Cash". looks to be great weather, and is always a good turnout.

we'd love to have guests and its only a few hours from RC Madness
godofcable is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.