Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
2008 R.O.A.R. On-Road Asphalt Nats! -Official Thread- (early info release) >

2008 R.O.A.R. On-Road Asphalt Nats! -Official Thread- (early info release)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

2008 R.O.A.R. On-Road Asphalt Nats! -Official Thread- (early info release)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-15-2008, 07:08 PM
  #661  
Regional Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
mrrcguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Jonesboro Akansas
Posts: 3,157
Trader Rating: 25 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by dodgeguy
I know Quinton said he will be announcing the spec tire today or tomorrow.

But if it is a tire that is not normally stocked what is everyone else planning on running the weekend of the 26?

I will be there for brushed stock. Unless someone proves 17.5 is faster or can at least keep up.
I am going to do my best to have at least a few dozen sets of the stated tire by the 26th. If this is not possible, I will have good stock on something like it. I'll have a reasonable price on all my tires and would love to have your tire business.
mrrcguy is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:09 PM
  #662  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas,Texas
Posts: 1,039
Default

Originally Posted by dodgeguy
I will be there for brushed stock. Unless someone proves 17.5 is faster or can at least keep up.
I got you covered. 17.5 will be fast...
Chris Adams is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:17 PM
  #663  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (208)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St Louis
Posts: 8,547
Trader Rating: 208 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Adams
I got you covered. 17.5 will be fast...
We will see. I have yet to run a 17.5 on rubber tire. I just know at the Carpet Nat's they were slower.

But we really will not know which 17.5 is legal for the race as all the 17.5 have a provisional approval.
dodgeguy is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:18 PM
  #664  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (208)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St Louis
Posts: 8,547
Trader Rating: 208 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by mrrcguy
I am going to do my best to have at least a few dozen sets of the stated tire by the 26th. If this is not possible, I will have good stock on something like it. I'll have a reasonable price on all my tires and would love to have your tire business.
Sounds good. I will give you my tire money
dodgeguy is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:19 PM
  #665  
Regional Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
mrrcguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Jonesboro Akansas
Posts: 3,157
Trader Rating: 25 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Adams
I got you covered. 17.5 will be fast...
Yeah, what he said. The 17.5 is no slouch when geared correctly. I personally have seen a 17.5 get to within .16 sec of the current 13.5 track record for the season.
mrrcguy is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:22 PM
  #666  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (208)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St Louis
Posts: 8,547
Trader Rating: 208 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by mrrcguy
Yeah, what he said. The 17.5 is no slouch when geared correctly. I personally have seen a 17.5 get to within .16 sec of the current 13.5 track record for the season.
That sounds good. BUT wait until the fast guys show up and beat the lap by .4
dodgeguy is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:24 PM
  #667  
Regional Moderator
Thread Starter
iTrader: (25)
 
mrrcguy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Jonesboro Akansas
Posts: 3,157
Trader Rating: 25 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by dodgeguy
That sounds good. BUT wait until the fast guys show up and beat the lap by .4
I have no doubt on that one.
mrrcguy is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:43 PM
  #668  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas,Texas
Posts: 1,039
Default

Right now Im thinking the 17.5 will be faster. The reason is that all of our cars have to be at 1525 grams. At carpet nats, you have to weigh in at 1418. Brushless equiped cars cant get that light that I know of... On rubber, you have to put weight in your car anyways so it might as well be a more efficient motor.

Btw, if brushed is faster then Im running it...
Chris Adams is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 07:59 PM
  #669  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (208)
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: St Louis
Posts: 8,547
Trader Rating: 208 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Adams
Right now Im thinking the 17.5 will be faster. The reason is that all of our cars have to be at 1525 grams. At carpet nats, you have to weigh in at 1418. Brushless equiped cars cant get that light that I know of... On rubber, you have to put weight in your car anyways so it might as well be a more efficient motor.

Btw, if brushed is faster then Im running it...
It will be interesting to see how the 17.5 runs on rubber tire. I may try a hacker to practice with. But I really like for ROAR to figure out the motor issue before the race. It seems they are draging the feet.

My rubber tire car need very little weight to make weight.
dodgeguy is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 08:09 PM
  #670  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (49)
 
andrewdoherty's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: ★Wylie, TX★
Posts: 3,815
Trader Rating: 49 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Adams
Right now Im thinking the 17.5 will be faster. The reason is that all of our cars have to be at 1525 grams. At carpet nats, you have to weigh in at 1418. Brushless equiped cars cant get that light that I know of... On rubber, you have to put weight in your car anyways so it might as well be a more efficient motor.

Btw, if brushed is faster then Im running it...
My foam BL car is 1418 : )
andrewdoherty is offline  
Old 04-15-2008, 10:40 PM
  #671  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Dallas,Texas
Posts: 1,039
Default

Thats cause you run lipo...
Chris Adams is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 03:57 AM
  #672  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (42)
 
John Tag's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Huntersville, NC
Posts: 8,925
Trader Rating: 42 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Chris Adams
Right now Im thinking the 17.5 will be faster. The reason is that all of our cars have to be at 1525 grams. At carpet nats, you have to weigh in at 1418. Brushless equiped cars cant get that light that I know of... On rubber, you have to put weight in your car anyways so it might as well be a more efficient motor.

Btw, if brushed is faster then Im running it...

Be sure to tell EA to bring ya a brushed motor...
John Tag is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 04:02 AM
  #673  
Company Representative
iTrader: (25)
 
ammdrew's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 10,956
Trader Rating: 25 (100%+)
Default

I would not worry about the approval list. the reason we had to do a adjustment is because we did not have good induction readings for the motors. We should have a large enough pool now to get correct numbers and slide them into the BL rules. Fixing the conditional part of the approval.
ammdrew is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 06:10 AM
  #674  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (15)
 
TimPotter's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Boynton Beach Fl > Randoph NJ
Posts: 7,486
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Why do you say that ROAR is dragging thier feet ? You obviously have a hard on for ROAR, why not be part of the solution, and help out, instead of taking all your shots. I am sure your regional director could use a hand.


Originally Posted by dodgeguy
It will be interesting to see how the 17.5 runs on rubber tire. I may try a hacker to practice with. But I really like for ROAR to figure out the motor issue before the race. It seems they are draging the feet.

My rubber tire car need very little weight to make weight.
TimPotter is offline  
Old 04-16-2008, 08:48 AM
  #675  
Tech Elite
 
Join Date: Feb 2004
Location: Chandler, Arizona
Posts: 3,273
Default

Originally Posted by dodgeguy
It seems they are draging the feet.
Well, it does appear the conditional approvals are about to expire in May

... I'm even wondering what the hold up is......

I think I'll look into that one today.

Last edited by Dawn Sanchez; 04-16-2008 at 09:18 AM.
Dawn Sanchez is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.