Corally HMX
#46
Tech Regular
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Good spot on the diff holders now being on end , i missed that
![Laughing](https://www.rctech.net/forum/classic_images/smilies/laugh2.gif)
#47
Tech Regular
iTrader: (10)
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The car looks good, but I wish they would have gone the same direction as the other touring car top deck designs. Also you still can not adjust the belt tension with the diff bearing holders like you can on all other cars. I like the new camber link mounts and sway bar holders. Will be interesting to see how the car does this upcoming season.
#48
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
maybe there will be an later update with an long topdeck? for the belt tension come belt tensioners.. but with the diff would be easier..
#49
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
The pics of the car you are seeing is a prototype. The actual production car is going to have a change made in the rear top deck/motor mount area. We are not sure what those exact changes are. As far as the long top deck - the rear carbon body post mounts also connect the layshaft mounts to the rear bulheads. This body post mount also connects the left and right rear bulkheads. There is some possibilities for even more flex in the rear of the car with adjustments made to this mount.
#50
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
So as I understand is that the car has more flex than the phi'09?
#51
#52
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
brad.
#53
#54
Tech Adept
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
This depends on a lot of tacts including the track condition etc.
As you already asked on site 1 - if this is your "logical step", that a car with high flex is good for stock classes, why you are not driving a TB-03 - or - Sakura Zero S
![Wink](https://www.rctech.net/forum/classic_images/smilies/wink.gif)
The only thing that i can say about the current corally prototype is that this car is a lot softer then the most other cars (TCX, 417, S411, BD5 etc.) - and that the motor mount in the first prototype was to soft, because you finish all your spur gears after one run
![Big Grin](https://www.rctech.net/forum/classic_images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
The PHI ī09 have no flex - and the HMX have to much flex, i think
![Big Grin](https://www.rctech.net/forum/classic_images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
As you can see, the Photon EX went over to a higher overall stiffnes, too. ... Should be the right way
![Smilie](https://www.rctech.net/forum/classic_images/smilies/smile.gif)
#55
Tech Regular
#56
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
#57
Tech Apprentice
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
![Big Grin](https://www.rctech.net/forum/classic_images/smilies/biggrin.gif)
#58
#59
Tech Apprentice
#60
![Default](https://www.rctech.net/forum/images/icons/icon1.gif)
Are they any changes from the prototype? The rear end looks real flexy, I hope they have done some changes there. And I really hope that you can fit gear diffs like I have on my 09. It have really been a big improvement on the lap times. You canīt be competitive with a ball diff in mod.