Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
SpeedMerchant Rev.7 >

SpeedMerchant Rev.7

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

SpeedMerchant Rev.7

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-04-2012, 04:47 PM
  #376  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (10)
 
flameoutgarrett's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Srcr Seattle, Wa
Posts: 3,649
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by JoelV
I'd start similar to that still with 4* caster. Maybe .5* camber when bite comes up.
Cool thanks! Gotta get it ready soon
flameoutgarrett is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 02:34 AM
  #377  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Rockville, MD
Posts: 5,058
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

My new rev. 7 is built. All is left electronics. Want to rebuild the front-end a second time. A couple things to do different. Can't wait to hit the track.
SRW141 is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 01:02 PM
  #378  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Springfield, VA
Posts: 429
Default

If anyone is looking to shed weight from their cars the CRC side links from the 1/10th scale cars are the same length part number 3280 and side link balls 13616 make a perfect replacement. They weigh about 5 grams less than the Speedmerchant carbon links and balls.

Another part I retrofitted was the CRC encore shock shaft, plastic parts and shock shaft extender all installed in the Speedmerchant shock. This setup lets you use current setups but gives you the convenience of the CRC shock, being able to change the spring without altering the shock length.
Attached Thumbnails SpeedMerchant Rev.7-photo.jpg  
avink007 is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 01:06 PM
  #379  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (49)
 
haywood's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Minnesota
Posts: 2,877
Trader Rating: 49 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by avink007
If anyone is looking to shed weight from their cars the CRC side links from the 1/10th scale cars are the same length part number 3280 and side link balls 13616 make a perfect replacement. They weigh about 5 grams less than the Speedmerchant carbon links and balls.

Another part I retrofitted was the CRC encore shock shaft, plastic parts and shock shaft extender all installed in the Speedmerchant shock. This setup lets you use current setups but gives you the convenience of the CRC shock, being able to change the spring without altering the shock length.
Adam

Could you post a pic of your entire car please? Thanks
haywood is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 01:18 PM
  #380  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Springfield, VA
Posts: 429
Default

Here is the entire car
Attached Thumbnails SpeedMerchant Rev.7-photo-2-.jpg  
avink007 is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 02:00 PM
  #381  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Springfield, VA
Posts: 429
Default

Originally Posted by avink007
Here is the entire car
There are a lot of "misfit" parts on this car. Team Tamale rear pod and formula steering blocks. Xray body posts. Losi titanium nitride kingpings cut to length. Team Associated TC6 rod ends and titanium nitride ball studs, along with the front axles from a 12R5. CRC side links and balls, and the CRC modified Speedmerchant shock. The rear hubs are from CEFX, but I will probably end up going back to standard hubs and run CRC tires because they are available at my local track. I also glued a RC12L4 front suspension brace to the chassis in front of the battery to keep it from shifting forward.

All in all the car turned out great and is awesome to drive.
avink007 is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 06:00 PM
  #382  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (34)
 
RedBullFiXX's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2003
Location: Intergalactic Planetary
Posts: 6,542
Trader Rating: 34 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by avink007
Here is the entire car
Nice bit of kit
RedBullFiXX is offline  
Old 09-05-2012, 09:46 PM
  #383  
Tech Master
 
LonnyJ1950's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ. USA
Posts: 1,385
Default

What are you rolling out at with your D3.5? Is it a 17.5? I've been running mine at 95mm, but have been thinking about going higher.
LonnyJ1950 is offline  
Old 09-06-2012, 09:01 AM
  #384  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Springfield, VA
Posts: 429
Default

Originally Posted by LonnyJ1950
What are you rolling out at with your D3.5? Is it a 17.5? I've been running mine at 95mm, but have been thinking about going higher.
The track I run at is about 90x50 usually the layout is tight, I am rolled out at 94mm with a turquoise rotor shimmed about .015" from the sensor board. I am still doing some testing with the gray and pink rotors, I like the 12.5mm rotors better than the 12.3 they don't seem to fade as much. It is a 17.5.
avink007 is offline  
Old 09-06-2012, 09:59 AM
  #385  
Tech Master
 
LonnyJ1950's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ. USA
Posts: 1,385
Default

Originally Posted by avink007
The track I run at is about 90x50 usually the layout is tight, I am rolled out at 94mm with a turquoise rotor shimmed about .015" from the sensor board. I am still doing some testing with the gray and pink rotors, I like the 12.5mm rotors better than the 12.3 they don't seem to fade as much. It is a 17.5.
Thanks. My track is slightly larger than that. I've still got the stock rotor and I'm rolling 95mm, but it seems to still be accelerating as I turn in at the end of the straight, so I'm thinking about going up.
LonnyJ1950 is offline  
Old 09-06-2012, 10:56 AM
  #386  
Tech Regular
 
Join Date: Nov 2008
Location: Springfield, VA
Posts: 429
Default

Originally Posted by LonnyJ1950
Thanks. My track is slightly larger than that. I've still got the stock rotor and I'm rolling 95mm, but it seems to still be accelerating as I turn in at the end of the straight, so I'm thinking about going up.
I wonder if you are going in the wrong direction. When you roll out higher it takes longer to accelerate not letting the car reach its top speed. Last I asked the guys at my track with the stock rotor were rolling out between 90-92mm. Something to test...
avink007 is offline  
Old 09-06-2012, 11:10 AM
  #387  
Tech Master
 
LonnyJ1950's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Tucson, AZ. USA
Posts: 1,385
Default

Thanks. I've been looking for input on this and it's hard to find.
LonnyJ1950 is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 02:41 PM
  #388  
R/C Tech Elite Member
Thread Starter
iTrader: (28)
 
hanulec's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: @ the post office
Posts: 10,278
Trader Rating: 28 (100%+)
Default

Hi Bruce - I'm not sure the best way to get in touch with Teru from Xenon Racing, but if you could ask him to bring some of his pan car camber gauges to the IIC (or the Speed Merchant web site) that would be fantastic. Cya soon..
-Driva
hanulec is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 05:00 PM
  #389  
Tech Master
iTrader: (72)
 
Swampracer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: Squamish
Posts: 1,790
Trader Rating: 72 (99%+)
Default Servo placement

Hi,

Did you notice a big difference with the car's handling mounting the servo "backwards". Weight over the wheels.

Thanks Greg G
Swampracer is offline  
Old 09-16-2012, 06:12 PM
  #390  
OVA
Tech Lord
iTrader: (86)
 
OVA's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: WASHINGTON
Posts: 10,306
Trader Rating: 86 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Swampracer
Hi,

Did you notice a big difference with the car's handling mounting the servo "backwards". Weight over the wheels.

Thanks Greg G
Hi Greg
Over here at TZ track last year there were afew guy were mounting their servos backward in their CRC 12th and WGT..
I beleive the new CRC 12th the servo are mount backward... it seem it give more steering in the low speed ...
OVA is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.