RC10B4.1 FT/WC

Reply Subscribe

Thread Tools

Search this Thread

11-14-2011 | 08:42 AM

#7411

xBRxSAIGON

Tech Regular

Joined: Apr 2009

Posts: 323

Quote:

Originally Posted by TfnG

My local indoor clay track does not allow boost in any stock classes. I'm running 69/33(b4.1) and still coming off at no more that 105 degrees. Doing this with a Ballistic motor and Tekin in blinky mode.

2 weeks ago the announcer was calling me out in first round saying I prolly had it boosted...until after the round I showed him the blinks. So I'd say my setup is pretty fast.

Are you still runnin a 69/33 setup if so w/ what timing set. Also would you recommend this on med. bite indoor clay/technical layout..

11-14-2011 | 08:52 AM

#7412

Wild Cherry

Tech Legend

Joined: Aug 2001

Posts: 22,595

From: TRCR Modified Driver

Quote:

Originally Posted by mjk1210

do you have Popped Cherry or perhaps Cherry Pie confused with Wild Cherry?

I got to get a new Avatar ....

11-14-2011 | 09:40 AM

#7413

Rich Panganiban

Tech Fanatic

iTrader: (72)

Joined: Nov 2004

Posts: 814

From: Southern California

Sorry if this has been asked already, but do the new B4.1 kits have the updated (lengthened) chassis included? Thanks.

11-14-2011 | 09:44 AM

#7414

bdyche

Tech Fanatic

iTrader: (5)

Joined: Aug 2004

Posts: 867

From: Marysville, WA

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Panganiban

Sorry if this has been asked already, but do the new B4.1 kits have the updated (lengthened) chassis included? Thanks.

No, the +8mm is still an option part.

11-14-2011 | 10:04 AM

#7415

-WHEELMAN-

Tech Elite

iTrader: (267)

Joined: Apr 2009

Posts: 4,511

From: Redlands, California

Quote:

Originally Posted by xBRxSAIGON

Are you still runnin a 69/33 setup if so w/ what timing set. Also would you recommend this on med. bite indoor clay/technical layout..

I would say closer to 72/32 for tight technical. Not sure if your talking tight or open technical??

11-14-2011 | 10:06 AM

#7416

brent701

Tech Master

iTrader: (8)

Joined: Oct 2011

Posts: 1,590

Quote:

Originally Posted by Rich Panganiban

Sorry if this has been asked already, but do the new B4.1 kits have the updated (lengthened) chassis included? Thanks.

No. Normal chassis

11-14-2011 | 10:24 AM

#7417

bilster44

Tech Addict

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 667

From: Sactown, Ca

Hey guys, are there many of ya out there that are running the the shorter front camber link? If so, are you liking it?

11-14-2011 | 11:06 AM

#7418

Asharus

Tech Elite

iTrader: (42)

Joined: Apr 2011

Posts: 3,123

From: Long Island, NY

Quote:

Originally Posted by Wild Cherry

Ran the Finnisher on my B4 8m for the first time last night and broke my personal best by about 5sec....

They told me it would be only slightly more aggressive compared to the Punisher.

I agree...

The 8m likes the extra steering , needs it actually and makes for a lot better performance than any other body I have use to date on the new chassis...

Don't expect a harder car to drive , the Finnisher is not darty at all .

I tell you now , get the thing for your 8m and hurry up about it ....

still using Brents set-up , except .....

back shock
drill #3 piston with a #55 & 27.5W oil , green spring

2.5 pivot block , 0 degree rear hub

Very fast ....

thx for that, which brent setup are you referring to? the old surf city classic one or the new indoor grand prix one? i'm running the surf city one and it feels like the car could use a little more rear traction

11-14-2011 | 12:00 PM

#7419

idrummerboy13

Tech Elite

iTrader: (15)

Joined: Jul 2010

Posts: 2,021

From: Deer Park

Quote:

Originally Posted by Asharus

your running that to the t? shocks setup and all... I found traction was great.

Maybe its the body? I liked my jc finnisher a lot with it...

11-14-2011 | 12:02 PM

#7420

Asharus

Tech Elite

iTrader: (42)

Joined: Apr 2011

Posts: 3,123

From: Long Island, NY

Quote:

Originally Posted by idrummerboy13

your running that to the t? shocks setup and all... I found traction was great.

Maybe its the body? I liked my jc finnisher a lot with it...

yep, everything. finnisher as well with the hi clearance wing cut down to the top line.

my sc10 is planted, turns on a dime and rear traction is great, but not so much on my b4.1. i switched from gold barcodes to soft rebars and it helped a little, but could still use some more bite.

11-14-2011 | 12:06 PM

#7421

bilster44

Tech Addict

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 667

From: Sactown, Ca

Quote:

Originally Posted by Asharus

I am/was referring to this one on the AE site when I was asking about the short front camber link. Proline Surf City Classic 08/28/2011. Are many/any of you guys running the shorter front link?

Last edited by bilster44; 11-14-2011 at 12:23 PM.

11-14-2011 | 12:32 PM

#7422

LOSIRACER77

Guest

iTrader: (2)

Joined: Jun 2009

Posts: 2,161

Quote:

Originally Posted by -WHEELMAN-

I would say closer to 72/32 for tight technical. Not sure if your talking tight or open technical??

How small of a track would u run this gearing on?? And what would I gear a tekin rs with a 10.5 stock no boost.

11-14-2011 | 01:38 PM

#7423

bilster44

Tech Addict

iTrader: (1)

Joined: Mar 2006

Posts: 667

From: Sactown, Ca

DOES ANYONE EVER RUN THE FRONT CAMBER LINK ON THE OUTSIDE HOLE OF THE FRONT SHOCK TOWER AND LIKE IT?

11-14-2011 | 02:16 PM

#7424

xBRxSAIGON

Tech Regular

Joined: Apr 2009

Posts: 323

Quote:

Originally Posted by -WHEELMAN-

I would say closer to 72/32 for tight technical. Not sure if your talking tight or open technical??

Tight Technical, right now i'm runnin 75/26 just so I dont over shoot the jumps, I have a 72/31 setup I can try. thanks

11-14-2011 | 02:22 PM

#7425

brent701

Tech Master

iTrader: (8)

Joined: Oct 2011

Posts: 1,590

Why does it seem a lot of you guys are so low on the Spur and high on the pinion?

I am running a 20/81 and it has a butt load of low end.