4LikesNEW HOBBYWING STOCK SUPERCHARGED SOFTWARE
03-18-2011 | 02:39 AM
#4081
Tech Fanatic
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 893
And without full logging software, you wouldn't be able to tell it either...
You might note that my .xls says nothing about turbo, why? because Turbo is related to something that is a load more difficult to quantify, which is the drivers throttle thumb...
You've missed the point of the sheet as well. It's a means to provide an idea of what the software is doing at a given point, not to provide 100% accurate values (there are way to many on track variables for that). Look at the sheet again, it says BOOST END RPM... nothing about max RPM
To say it's failed is a bit bloody rich!
You might note that my .xls says nothing about turbo, why? because Turbo is related to something that is a load more difficult to quantify, which is the drivers throttle thumb...
You've missed the point of the sheet as well. It's a means to provide an idea of what the software is doing at a given point, not to provide 100% accurate values (there are way to many on track variables for that). Look at the sheet again, it says BOOST END RPM... nothing about max RPM
To say it's failed is a bit bloody rich!
yes, it's best to use the RPM Log,
and so max RPM data also will do, to get best setting's Under Load.
03-18-2011 | 04:07 AM
#4083
224 v's 119 v's 221 v's 213
enough of the rpm log please, talk about it when its out! I have a GM and I never make use of the max rpm log. Time/boost/turbo per lap times. Couldnt care about the rpm tbh.
lets talk about the current s/w.
224 v's 119 v's 221 v's 213
whats everyone preferring and why?
what settings are better, more boost or more turbo, delays, turbo rates,what tracks?
I'm finding 40/20, 0 delay to work the best in 119, medium sized, med-high traction track.
have not tried 1224 or 213 yet, tried 221 but it keep blowing my capacitors
lets talk about the current s/w.
224 v's 119 v's 221 v's 213
whats everyone preferring and why?
what settings are better, more boost or more turbo, delays, turbo rates,what tracks?
I'm finding 40/20, 0 delay to work the best in 119, medium sized, med-high traction track.
have not tried 1224 or 213 yet, tried 221 but it keep blowing my capacitors
03-18-2011 | 04:16 AM
#4084
Tech Regular
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 266
From: Dorset UK
I downloaded the fw from the Hobbywing site last night and it's the same I I got a week ago. Still only has 119 and 221 on of the ones you mentioned above. Am happy with 221 though as plenty quick enough but more importantly the motor is cooler.
03-18-2011 | 05:53 AM
#4088
Tech Adept
iTrader: (6)
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 176
software help
Hoping someone can guide me a little here. I am trying to update the software (as soon as I open the Hobbywing application I get a message to download new software) but as soon as I click to download it immedeately says "update failed". Any ideas or where I can go to download it manually?
