Solara

iTrader: (17)

Hold on...I talked to Andrea and he is doing a revision on the setup sheet.

ronaldo-1234

iTrader: (16)

so the 107/110 does not have supercharger settings ? Am i right to say 230/231 is the better and upgraded version of 107/110?

racerb

iTrader: (2)

no 107/110 does not have super charger..... 230/231 does have it!! use at own risk is what they say

Shawn Palmer

ronaldo:
Correct on both, yes.

racerb:
just keep experimenting till you find a sweet spot - then let everyone else know

jixx:
For mod, the standard software that came on the ESC is best.
Gearing depends on the track, your driving style, car setup - everything. Start with about a 20t pinion and work from there - use lap times to tell you if you are going the right or wrong way with settings and gearing.

Shawn Palmer

Repost for the link to the BETA software:
http://rapidshare.com/files/36249319...arger_Beta.zip

racerb

iTrader: (2)

ya no worries.... I just a little nervous as this my first brushless system.... and there is a crap load of numbers/adjustments
I have tried to take your recomendations and inset them with what some other guy's settings are (which are totaly different by the way... which is to be expected)

Born2Run

How many settings do you have on menu #15? I have only 6.

skypilot

iTrader: (14)

6 is correct

Born2Run

I'm confused.I tried both 320 and 321.On 321 i can feel very easy when the turbo kicks but no on 320 as it looks more linear.On 321 when i set on #12 the 1 (Supercharger boost level OFF) i still have the feeling of the turbo kick.On 320 must be the same as the motor sound doesn't change at all. Has anybody noticed something similar?

cherry2blost

iTrader: (1)

Just a thought but it could be where the timing is coming in still, if you remember on 110 there was a 'cogging' effect when it stepped from sensored to sensorless at about 1/3 throttle, could be related because on my speedo it used to feel a bit like a 'turbo' function when the timing kicked in, may just be doing it in a different way due to the other new parameters?

Dunno kinda makes some perverse sense to me.

Born2Run

It sounds to me like a bug.

racingnazy

iTrader: (12)

I was thinking how great it would to be "fast" this year in mod ashfault!!!..

So i strapped a 10.5 in the tc5, settings were 4,4,4, gearing of 5.45.

I walked out side with the warm sun on my face. Turned the radio on turn the car on. Bent over put the car down, and slowly applied throttle..... and holy shit a rocket down down the road.!!! I mean the foam on the tires went hard from the fricktion.... Unreal

thank you speed passion you made my day...!!!

Solara

iTrader: (17)

Your gearing looks alittle bit on the "Hot dangersous" side....but I am glad you like the software.

baldman666

Hi Shawn

It is probably just me being dumb but in the above quote you seem to be saying
"231 for 10.5 it is slightly milder than 231" ???

Should one of those numbers be 230 and the other 231?? If so which way around?

It's just that I run 10.5 and I am awaiting my LCD programming card to come into stock at Schumacher. It will be my first adventure with the LCD programming card and I want to put the best 10.5 software onto my new GT 2.1

Keep up the excellent work and thanks

Shawn Palmer

SORRY! (too much work, too little sleep showing through...)

231 is milder than 230

230 is more intense than 231

Thanks for the kind words!