Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Tamiya mini cooper >

Tamiya mini cooper

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree295Likes

Tamiya mini cooper

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-13-2009 | 01:16 PM
  #9061  
tony gray's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,549
From: Melbourne, Australia. Home of rc-mini.net
Default

Here you go, a direct photographic comparison. M05 - M03.



Look closely and all the major components (motor, battery,etc) do not appear to have moved relative to each other.

Rear shock mounts appear identical in configuration. Front mounts are very different - adding more weight to my initial argument that the driving force behind the design of this car was to allow the fitment of lower bodyshells...

The whole 'Lower C of G' thing wasn't/isn't a factor. Getting more room at the front was what they were looking for.
tony gray is offline  
Old 05-13-2009 | 09:37 PM
  #9062  
mangoman's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,981
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

OMG thats what that plate is for!

To cover the switch
mangoman is offline  
Old 05-13-2009 | 10:28 PM
  #9063  
tony gray's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,549
From: Melbourne, Australia. Home of rc-mini.net
Default

Did you seriously not know that Marty?
tony gray is offline  
Old 05-14-2009 | 12:43 AM
  #9064  
Rozzt_iwa's Avatar
Tech Addict
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 553
From: sydney
Default

mangoman OMG thats what that plate is for!
i thought it was a transpoder mount

and where is the reciver
Rozzt_iwa is offline  
Old 05-14-2009 | 12:49 AM
  #9065  
cannon's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (35)
 
Joined: Sep 2003
Posts: 7,245
From: A total distraction
Default

Originally Posted by tony gray
Did you seriously not know that Marty?
Technically , according to the Tamiya Mini instruction manual, it is a "not used" part
cannon is offline  
Old 05-14-2009 | 07:55 AM
  #9066  
mangoman's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,981
From: Sydney, Australia
Default

Yeah why is it like something which they used to do way back when....

Ive looked at it a few times after finishing the kit and wondered what an earth it could possibly be for and how it might fit onto another car. I guess that's why you guys have fast cars. You know how to use the go fast options!
mangoman is offline  
Old 05-14-2009 | 02:30 PM
  #9067  
tony gray's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,549
From: Melbourne, Australia. Home of rc-mini.net
Default

M05 Promo Video..

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UPpqwmBcD7I
tony gray is offline  
Old 05-15-2009 | 03:22 PM
  #9068  
tony gray's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,549
From: Melbourne, Australia. Home of rc-mini.net
Default

It was inevitable that it had to happen..



A dedicated section to the M05 is now up on rc-mini.net. All the currently available info all in one place, and updated as soon as we find out anything new. And this is where you'll find the first review (when we can get one..)
HERE
tony gray is offline  
Old 05-15-2009 | 04:15 PM
  #9069  
gtfour93's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 658
Default

Originally Posted by cannon
Technically , according to the Tamiya Mini instruction manual, it is a "not used" part
Alright! More spare parts for the tool box. What's the item number on the transponder stay?
gtfour93 is offline  
Old 05-15-2009 | 04:33 PM
  #9070  
MD's Avatar
MD
Tech Champion
iTrader: (138)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,786
From: Illinois
Default

Tony - Is the steering in the M05 similar to the Dark Impact?
MD is offline  
Old 05-15-2009 | 04:36 PM
  #9071  
TryHard's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2004
Posts: 5,395
From: Adelaide, Australia
Default

some pics of fhow thtee M05 changes it's wheelbase...

http://www.geocities.jp/hobby_show_a...a2009/0301.htm
swb - mwb Length

http://www.geocities.jp/hobby_show_a...a2009/0302.htm
all three

http://www.geocities.jp/hobby_show_a...a2009/0303.htm
mwb - lwb


Look closely, and it appears that the wheelbase is changed mainly by moving the rear arms. This goes in combination of moving the rear shock tower and body mounts (looks like three mounting positions on the chassis, and both shock tower and body mount bracket use the same mount)

For the swb, the arms are far forward as poss, with the body mount in the front mounting positions, and the shock tower in the middle one.

For the mwb, the arms appear to moved backwards, with the body mount in the middle mount, and the shock tower in the rear mount.

For the lwb, the arms are in the rear position, but also flipped. The shock mount off the front of the arm, and the body mount is in the rear mount, and the shock tower in the middle one...

So no more chassis spacers anymore...

Regards
Ed
TryHard is online now  
Old 05-15-2009 | 05:06 PM
  #9072  
tony gray's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,549
From: Melbourne, Australia. Home of rc-mini.net
Default

Well done Ed..I'd found the same pics and was busily putting them onto our site while your were typing this!

I'll give em points for doing this, sure we did the same thing with our SWB to MWB conversion 3 years ago.....
tony gray is offline  
Old 05-15-2009 | 08:20 PM
  #9073  
monkeyracing's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 6,305
From: Calgary, AB
Default

Did anyone else notice that the little cards beside the cars in those photos are labelled as "M-03" "M-03M" and "M-03L"?

Oops.

Hey Tony, I also just noticed that on your site you've got sections for the M chassis models 1 through 3 and then you jump to 5. Is there a little "4" prejudice in action here?

Jim
monkeyracing is offline  
Old 05-15-2009 | 08:28 PM
  #9074  
Drifting101's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 2,199
From: Melbourne, Aus
Default

Originally Posted by monkeyracing
Did anyone else notice that the little cards beside the cars in those photos are labelled as "M-03" "M-03M" and "M-03L"?

Oops.

Hey Tony, I also just noticed that on your site you've got sections for the M chassis models 1 through 3 and then you jump to 5. Is there a little "4" prejudice in action here?

Jim
The 04 is not a true mini IMO 'cause it is rear wheel drive
Drifting101 is offline  
Old 05-15-2009 | 10:02 PM
  #9075  
tony gray's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (7)
 
Joined: Jun 2002
Posts: 3,549
From: Melbourne, Australia. Home of rc-mini.net
Default

Jim I reckon M03's outsell M04's about 500 to 1.....

And the site reflects the interest level. Given that we've been online now since Sept 2006 and you're the FIRST person to point it out... I'd suggest that our own lack of interest reflects everyone elses!

Oh..and Matt's right.. 4WD and RWD don't count...
tony gray is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.