Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro On-Road
HPI R40 Nitro Car Forum >

HPI R40 Nitro Car Forum

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

HPI R40 Nitro Car Forum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-08-2003, 08:11 AM
  #376  
Tech Regular
 
treky11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 350
Default

hey is it me, or is fastharry's signature file WAY too long. I'm tired of looking at 11 lines of his signature and scrolling through extras screens for his signature drivle.

Last edited by treky11; 09-08-2003 at 08:19 AM.
treky11 is offline  
Old 09-08-2003, 10:09 AM
  #377  
Tech Adept
 
The Sleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 123
Default

Originally posted by fastharry
yeah,but you might have hit the other side and cracked the tank
Well believe it or not, I did crack the tank on my R40. Also cracked the upper deck, broke the servo horn and the servo mounting braces!!
The Sleeper is offline  
Old 09-08-2003, 10:16 AM
  #378  
Tech Adept
 
The Sleeper's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: West Virginia
Posts: 123
Default

Originally posted by treky11
Stop trying to make excuses for the R40's weak points. Accept them and move on.
Good point.

The TC3 had many weak points. First was the bumper. Did anyone break their stock bumper? And then there's the shock towers. Has anyone broke their diff case? You know, where the shock tower bolts on...
The Sleeper is offline  
Old 09-08-2003, 01:41 PM
  #379  
Tech Addict
 
BallPy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 544
Default

Originally posted by The Sleeper
BUT,,, the thing that had alot of people worried about the R40 happened to me. I bet I'm the first victim of the "stuck out in the open" steering servo. Let's just say my prefectly good steering servo is now an unregconizable pile of junk.

I didn't get T-boned. I just hit a concrete barrier while barrel rolling down the straight stretch. The concrete made a direct hit on my servo. When I picked my car up, the servo was hanging by the wires. Mannnn,,,, I did not want to see that. And I was winning the race
I have found that using the Futaba S9550 servo helps this problem. If you are not fimilar with the servo it is the low profile one. It is a good bit shorter than standard servos so this keeps more of it under the upperdeck and less out in the open to get hit.
BallPy is offline  
Old 09-08-2003, 01:45 PM
  #380  
Tech Addict
 
BallPy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Northern Virginia
Posts: 544
Default

Originally posted by treky11
1. The Rx box and the way it floats (although I want to know why Hara ran his car differently )
The reason Hara ran the car without the radio box was to lighten the car up. This car is a good bit heavier than most people like. He also l ran a lighter chassis. From what I understand they took weight off anywhere they could.
BallPy is offline  
Old 09-08-2003, 03:35 PM
  #381  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
 
fastharry™'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2001
Location: Louisville, KY!.. USA!! ....Home of http://www.fastharry.com
Posts: 2,847
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default


Last edited by fastharry™; 09-08-2003 at 03:48 PM.
fastharry™ is offline  
Old 09-09-2003, 09:40 PM
  #382  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 16
Default

treky11 ....how do u like ur .12 os tr turbo...im getting a r40 and im stuck on that or the novarossi ns12 5 port....thanks
raveupon is offline  
Old 09-09-2003, 09:54 PM
  #383  
Tech Regular
 
treky11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 350
Default

just ran my os turbo for the first time tonite. tough to say right now.

the engine feels very good but was running a bit hotter than i would have liked. around 270. problem is that it was only about 65F degrees out tonite.

i only have about 7 tanks through it right now and its pretty tight so it might be getting a bit hotter because of that.

i can say that it idles like a champ, easy to tune and starts right up no problem.

i am sure the motor will fly in my ntc3 but i am concerned that the r40 might be too heavy for it.

i only paid 145 for the motor and bang for the buck i think its probably the best engine you can get for the price. one more night of running and i will be able to tell.

i have been running a 5 port rb in my ntc3 all season so that is my frame of reference right now.

i still believe os- tr turbo is a great engine but i want to run it once more to be sure. i'm going to play with my clutch settings this weekend and run it again during the day, hopefully it will be a bit warmer and then let you know.
treky11 is offline  
Old 09-09-2003, 11:05 PM
  #384  
Tech Prophet
 
InitialD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MORDOR
Posts: 19,679
Default

Originally posted by treky11
i am sure the motor will fly in my ntc3 but i am concerned that the r40 might be too heavy for it.
The OS engine should be torquey engine. With the R40 having high final drive ratios, I don't think you'll have problems.

I would use OS engines if I run on small tight tracks. Not for large open type.
InitialD is offline  
Old 09-09-2003, 11:27 PM
  #385  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: NC
Posts: 16
Default

SO FOR PARKING LOT BASING U WOULD RECOMMEND THE OS ..INSTEAD OF THE ROSSI NS12 5 PORT...I WANNA BE AS FAST AS I CAN BE
raveupon is offline  
Old 09-10-2003, 12:32 AM
  #386  
Tech Prophet
 
InitialD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: MORDOR
Posts: 19,679
Default

Originally posted by raveupon
SO FOR PARKING LOT BASING U WOULD RECOMMEND THE OS ..INSTEAD OF THE ROSSI NS12 5 PORT...I WANNA BE AS FAST AS I CAN BE
Parking lot bashing tracks can be huge too The selection of engine will depend on your track and more importantly the available gearing on the car.

If your car has very high final drive ratios (small pinions, big spurs), then a high revving NS12 engine can do the job nicely. OS engines have more bottom end and you can get away with large pinions / small spurs combo.

Power is nothing without control. You can be fast, but what's the use if you cannot handle it?
InitialD is offline  
Old 09-10-2003, 12:35 AM
  #387  
Tech Master
 
cHckbOY5's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2002
Location: Bay Area, CA
Posts: 1,077
Default

i thought the r40 would be too low for parking lots
cHckbOY5 is offline  
Old 09-10-2003, 12:20 PM
  #388  
Tech Regular
 
treky11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 350
Default

the r40 is ok on a clean level parking lot, for racing in a parking lot. i would not call it a bashing car.

the ride height can be adjusted like any other car but if you need lots of clearance because your running on a very rough lot or not a clean lot you probably will be happier with another car.
treky11 is offline  
Old 09-10-2003, 12:48 PM
  #389  
Tech Regular
 
puma1824's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2003
Location: Maryland, USA
Posts: 339
Default

Originally posted by treky11
the r40 is ok on a clean level parking lot, for racing in a parking lot. i would not call it a bashing car.

the ride height can be adjusted like any other car but if you need lots of clearance because your running on a very rough lot or not a clean lot you probably will be happier with another car.
Never heard back from you about your shocks...

-Puma
puma1824 is offline  
Old 09-10-2003, 12:54 PM
  #390  
Tech Regular
 
treky11's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Location: NJ
Posts: 350
Default

I sent the pic 2 nites ago. I'll send again tonite when I get home.
treky11 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.