18LikesXray NT1
12-29-2007 | 01:19 AM
#2296
Tech Master
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,021
12-29-2007 | 01:24 AM
#2297
Tech Master
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,021
12-29-2007 | 03:37 PM
#2301
DS Motorsport, these 2 servos are still the orginals. They would be 6 months old, raced twice per month plus testing.
They have taken a fair beating as our track is marked out with 50mm polly tube.
If the end point adjustment and servo saver is not to loose or tight all should be well. I would recommend the servo for throttle & steering.
Now I have written this,they will probably fail now
They have taken a fair beating as our track is marked out with 50mm polly tube.If the end point adjustment and servo saver is not to loose or tight all should be well. I would recommend the servo for throttle & steering.
Now I have written this,they will probably fail now
For steering i'll keep my sanwa wrx, for steering the feel of a sanwa servo is just the best, i think.
And i've knocked wood for you so they won't fail
12-29-2007 | 09:44 PM
#2303
01-01-2008 | 12:46 AM
#2305
Anyone tried these belts for the NT1?
http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZapp6cxc
I want to stock up on spares, and these are about 50% the cost of geninue belts.
Here is the quote:
http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZapp6cxc
I want to stock up on spares, and these are about 50% the cost of geninue belts.
Here is the quote:
Brand new Front high torque direct replacement belt for your Xray NT1!!!
These are curvilinear direct placement for your Xray NT1, The shape of the teeth on these belts are elliptical rather then trapezoids (the stock belts are trapezoidal), here's why these belts are better than the stock ones:
* Stronger and more durable than the stock belts, these belts have more backings than the stock belts, yet they are softer, providing with less friction in the belt drive.
* Neoprene construction allows high flexibility in extremely high environments
* Elliptical teeth gives better "bite" between the gears due to deeper engagements
* Decreases slippage between pulleys.
* These belts carry 120% to 200% more load from trapezoidal belts.
* Please refer to diagram below for illustrations on elliptical teeth belts.
These are curvilinear direct placement for your Xray NT1, The shape of the teeth on these belts are elliptical rather then trapezoids (the stock belts are trapezoidal), here's why these belts are better than the stock ones:
* Stronger and more durable than the stock belts, these belts have more backings than the stock belts, yet they are softer, providing with less friction in the belt drive.
* Neoprene construction allows high flexibility in extremely high environments
* Elliptical teeth gives better "bite" between the gears due to deeper engagements
* Decreases slippage between pulleys.
* These belts carry 120% to 200% more load from trapezoidal belts.
* Please refer to diagram below for illustrations on elliptical teeth belts.
01-01-2008 | 02:31 AM
#2306
Belts
Anyone tried these belts for the NT1?
http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZapp6cxc
I want to stock up on spares, and these are about 50% the cost of geninue belts.
Here is the quote:
http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZapp6cxc
I want to stock up on spares, and these are about 50% the cost of geninue belts.
Here is the quote:
01-01-2008 | 05:24 AM
#2307
Tech Master
Joined: May 2007
Posts: 1,021
Anyone tried these belts for the NT1?
http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZapp6cxc
I want to stock up on spares, and these are about 50% the cost of geninue belts.
Here is the quote:
http://search.ebay.com/_W0QQsassZapp6cxc
I want to stock up on spares, and these are about 50% the cost of geninue belts.
Here is the quote:
i have been using them ,they seem to hold up better than the standed ones
there a bit thicker than the std belt but which help it you pick up a stone or rubble..there a little softer to the touch than the std ones
but dont overtighten the belt i did on the rear and had one snap and seperate ,but that thats the only problem ive had with these belts
a good ebayer to deal with also
hope this helps
Last edited by grub; 01-01-2008 at 05:31 AM. Reason: add addition info
