710LikesTeam Associated RC10B64 Thread
09-19-2017 | 04:43 PM
#2641
I run the longer shocks and tower with vrp valve pistons, chrome shafts and machined internals. It has really helped keep the back end stable on a very bumpy loose track. If your track is bumpy I would say it's worth it. For smooth Clay I wouldn't bother.
I run with the orings but wouldn't say it's necessary. I have never run without them to see how close it is to having the drive shaft pop out from the center outdrives.
I run with the orings but wouldn't say it's necessary. I have never run without them to see how close it is to having the drive shaft pop out from the center outdrives.
Thanks for the replies!!
09-20-2017 | 06:37 PM
#2642
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 888
From: Riverside, CA
The longer shock bodies obviously hold more fluid, therefore work better for jumps and bumps. They can be used anywhere. The conditions you would run the shorter shock bodies and tower would be very smooth and high bite astro or carpet, as it keeps the center of gravity lower.
09-20-2017 | 06:56 PM
#2643
Shocks
The longer shock bodies obviously hold more fluid, therefore work better for jumps and bumps. They can be used anywhere. The conditions you would run the shorter shock bodies and tower would be very smooth and high bite astro or carpet, as it keeps the center of gravity lower.
Thanks!
09-22-2017 | 05:39 AM
#2645
If I stick with the class then yes, I'll probably upgrade the motor,, the 17.5 was what the guy threw in the deal to get me started
Thank for the info I was a little worried about that too, I was going to pick up a 28 to start, I'm going to pull it apart and confirm the 81 or 78 before I do anything,, I assumed it was a 81 because I thought that was the stock gear,, but I'm not 100% sure because I bought it assembled.
if the 17.5 isn't really workable,, well I know what to do.
tnx
Thank for the info I was a little worried about that too, I was going to pick up a 28 to start, I'm going to pull it apart and confirm the 81 or 78 before I do anything,, I assumed it was a 81 because I thought that was the stock gear,, but I'm not 100% sure because I bought it assembled.
if the 17.5 isn't really workable,, well I know what to do.
tnx
09-22-2017 | 02:57 PM
#2646
Tech Adept
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 208
From: Oak Hills, SoCal
Does anyone have the running weight of this buggy with all electronics, tires and battery? I have a TLR 22-4 1.0 and with everything (Ti screw kit) it comes in at 1771g. I heard the new Tekno EB410 comes in at 1742g ready to run but was wondering what this buggy comes in at. Thanks!
09-23-2017 | 07:13 PM
#2652
Tech Apprentice
Joined: Aug 2008
Posts: 93
The longer shock bodies obviously hold more fluid, therefore work better for jumps and bumps. They can be used anywhere. The conditions you would run the shorter shock bodies and tower would be very smooth and high bite astro or carpet, as it keeps the center of gravity lower.
09-23-2017 | 08:29 PM
#2653
Love my B64 but the Noise makes me miss my whisper quiet 22-4 2.0, LoL..
09-23-2017 | 09:19 PM
#2654
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (19)
Joined: May 2005
Posts: 888
From: Riverside, CA
That kit looks discontinued. The only difference you need is the 31mm body. The shock shaft and all other parts between the 27.5mm shock and 31mm are the same. So if you already have the rear shocks you only need asc91758 for kashima bodies or asc91482 for the standard bodies.
09-26-2017 | 09:53 AM
#2655
Arm mount pills
Is there a pill chart for the B64D that has how the front an rear pulls affect the toe and anti squat? I know the B6 has the pill chart, but is it the same for the wheeler, and affect on the front?