Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree2991Likes

1/12 forum

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-05-2016 | 04:22 PM
  #44941  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 495
From: Bondurant, IA
Default

Originally Posted by biz77
Limiting capacity in a Lipo class sounds like a recipe for disaster... that is unless you enjoy watching cars dump and the battery and catch on fire. Not sure too many track operators would be too happy with that spectacle.
Correct, so now we're down to limiting winds, or boost/turbo. Granted this only really applies for mod, but if everyone goes 2S are we going to a 35.5 brushless motor for the "new" stock class? 2S 25.5 is more like 1S 13.5 right now.
fenton06 is offline  
Old 10-05-2016 | 04:26 PM
  #44942  
robk's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Aug 2001
Posts: 8,314
From: Macho Business Donkey Wrestler
Default

Originally Posted by howardcano
I haven't heard about any rule changes, but I do know that there has been a bunch of discussion about it. I find it amazing, and a bit disconcerting, that many people don't seem to understand the physics of the situation. If we are talking about open motors, then changing to 2s will have absolutely no effect on performance. But it is a way for manufacturers to sell new products to replace our "outdated" 1s equipment!
IFMAR is 2s lipo
robk is offline  
Old 10-05-2016 | 04:38 PM
  #44943  
howardcano's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,784
From: Olathe, KS
Default

Straight from the man himself, posted on the other thread I mentioned:

Originally Posted by robk
This is an IFMAR decision only. ROAR has made no changes ***REPEAT*** Roar has made no changes. 2s open modified 1/12 for IFMAR only.

They are also adding a 13.5 class to the 1/12 worlds, which I assume will be 2s as well. Not sure how much different this will be to modified...
I wonder what possible reason IFMAR has for doing this...
howardcano is offline  
Old 10-05-2016 | 05:54 PM
  #44944  
HK500Pilot's Avatar
Tech Adept
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 228
From: Huntington Beach, CA
Default

Originally Posted by fenton06
Just heard in the interview with Hagberg from IIC that IFMAR just approved a rule change to 2S for 1/12? Can't seem to find ANYTHING online about it?

Only thing I've been able to find is THIS INTERVIEW WITH HAGBERG 2S part starts around 1:30...
This sounds about right since I just dropped a pretty decent amount of money in the last couple weeks on 1s specific ESC's.
HK500Pilot is offline  
Old 10-05-2016 | 06:24 PM
  #44945  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (6)
 
Joined: Nov 2014
Posts: 341
From: NoVa
Default

Anyone near the Wash D.C. Baltimore area check this out

http://www.rctech.net/forum/mid-atla...timore-md.html
tekin112000 is offline  
Old 10-05-2016 | 11:44 PM
  #44946  
Peakki's Avatar
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 162
From: Finland
Default

So in the next 1/12 WC, 2S and in south africa. Will we see 10 drivers attending?

I'm wondering how fast 2S will go with open mod motor, what about tire wear? Or the skill level needed. 1S with boosted 3.5 is more than plenty. Even thought I like it, I can do 6.5 1S blinky because of more drivers.

Hope that efra really doesn't follow this IFMAR 2S rule!
Peakki is offline  
Old 10-06-2016 | 12:32 AM
  #44947  
howardcano's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,784
From: Olathe, KS
Default

Originally Posted by Peakki
I'm wondering how fast 2S will go with open mod motor
There will be no change in performance. If the battery is still the same dimensions and weight as a 1s, it will still contain the same total energy as a 1s, and the drivers will still select motors and gearing to use almost all of the energy during a run.

We still have no idea what this change was supposed to accomplish.

Last edited by howardcano; 10-06-2016 at 12:55 AM.
howardcano is offline  
Old 10-06-2016 | 03:54 AM
  #44948  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 153
Default

I am going to be the devil on this.

on the EFRA proposals LRP is the one saying to go to 2s on 12th cars.
LRP has no 1s speedo, LRP motors are not good on 1s set ups...

So i can assume that LRP has not been able to develop a 1s speedo as the Flow is not and they have not announced anything related this year. So, I am want to understand that they have take the decision of trying to go to 2s on 12th only because they are not able or they do not want to develop a 1s speedo.

EFRA AGM proposal for electric classes, http://news.efra.ws/fileadmin/news/2...ectionsrev.pdf LRP proposal is between pages 2 and 4.

Cheers
Javier
jimjav is offline  
Old 10-06-2016 | 08:01 AM
  #44949  
howardcano's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,784
From: Olathe, KS
Default

Thanks for the link, Javier.

I noticed the following comment in the proposal:

"Consensus was achieved between all federations and the manufacturers that this would be desirable."

But we now know that ROAR voted against it.

Here is the reasoning given for the change:

"Higher voltage is much easier to ensure trouble-free operation of the receiver and servo, as there is a big voltage difference between the supply voltage and the minimum required voltage of the receiver and servo. With 1s there is only a small voltage difference causing possible issues."

This "problem" was solved many years ago, by many manufacturers. It is only a problem for those manufacturers who can't or won't design their equipment properly.

I did not notice any provision for permitting both 1s and 2s to be used in modified, which would have made sense, as nobody would be forced to buy new equipment.
howardcano is offline  
Old 10-06-2016 | 08:09 AM
  #44950  
patorz31's Avatar
Tech Master
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,554
From: Edmonton Ab
Default

Originally Posted by howardcano
Thanks for the link, Javier.

I noticed the following comment in the proposal:

"Consensus was achieved between all federations and the manufacturers that this would be desirable."

But we now know that ROAR voted against it.

Here is the reasoning given for the change:

"Higher voltage is much easier to ensure trouble-free operation of the receiver and servo, as there is a big voltage difference between the supply voltage and the minimum required voltage of the receiver and servo. With 1s there is only a small voltage difference causing possible issues."

This "problem" was solved many years ago, by many manufacturers. It is only a problem for those manufacturers who can't or won't design their equipment properly.

I did not notice any provision for permitting both 1s and 2s to be used in modified, which would have made sense, as nobody would be forced to buy new equipment.
So again I say "Follow the money...."
Seems every time a stupid rule shows up it because one of the established manufacturers can't or won't make products to compete with the ones that can.
patorz31 is offline  
Old 10-06-2016 | 08:14 AM
  #44951  
howardcano's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,784
From: Olathe, KS
Default

Originally Posted by patorz31
So again I say "Follow the money...."
Seems every time a stupid rule shows up it because one of the established manufacturers can't or won't make products to compete with the ones that can.
Fortunately the rule doesn't apply to us. The USA, Canada, and other countries will likely continue with 1s, since there is no good reason to change.
howardcano is offline  
Old 10-06-2016 | 08:24 AM
  #44952  
RacinJ's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
 
Joined: Apr 2004
Posts: 940
From: Mesa Az
Default

Originally Posted by jimjav

on the EFRA proposals LRP is the one saying to go to 2s on 12th cars.
LRP has no 1s speedo, LRP motors are not good on 1s set ups...

So i can assume that LRP has not been able to develop a 1s speedo as the Flow is not and they have not announced anything related this year. So, I am want to understand that they have take the decision of trying to go to 2s on 12th only because they are not able or they do not want to develop a 1s speedo.
I have an LRP Flow that is rated for 1s and has worked flawlessly in 1s. I can't think of many major ESC manufacturer that doesn't offer a 1s speed control. Even Tekin has one in the works.

The 2s 1/12th scale rule change does sound like a manufactures money grab.

Specifications

Integrated heatsink + fan yes
Sensored Brushless System yes
Voltage input 3.7 - 7.4V
Rated current 400A/phase
Typical voltage drop @20A 0.011V/phase
Forward/Brake yes
B.E.C. 6.0V/3.0A Linear
Dimensions 32 x 34 x 21mm
Weight (without wires) 40g
Multi mode profile adjustment yes
Power wires 3.3mm˛
Recommended motor limit (at 7.4V) over 3.0T
Plugged fan yes
RacinJ is offline  
Old 10-06-2016 | 09:54 AM
  #44953  
Tech Master
iTrader: (52)
 
Joined: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,455
From: Spokane, WA
Default

True you can use a Flow with 1s. You just won't see any more voltage to the receiver and servo than what the battery is supplying because there is no built-in booster for the BEC. I used a SXX Stock Spec with Flow board (booster removed) and no outboard booster or rx pack for a year in 1/12th scale. Worked flawlessly for me. Servo could have been a bit faster, but otherwise perfect operation.
biz77 is offline  
Old 10-06-2016 | 10:06 AM
  #44954  
Tech Master
iTrader: (10)
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 1,799
From: New Bern, N.C.
Default

perhaps it's a dumb question, but what happens if one connects a one cell specific speedo to a two cell pack? Does the one cell speedo simply send too much voltage to the receiver......or does the whole thing melt down?
vafactor is offline  
Old 10-06-2016 | 10:13 AM
  #44955  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (24)
 
Joined: Feb 2015
Posts: 495
From: Bondurant, IA
Default

Originally Posted by vafactor
perhaps it's a dumb question, but what happens if one connects a one cell specific speedo to a two cell pack? Does the one cell speedo simply send too much voltage to the receiver......or does the whole thing melt down?
You will have found the right combination to release the magic white smoke!
fenton06 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.