Tekno RC SCT410.3 Thread
#92
#94

The only thing I don't like is the side portrutions because tires rub against it. The body would be perfect with more clearance on the sides and the ass little shorter for the Tekno.
#96
i have one painted up and ready to go too. i've been really digging the evo body this year, but threw one of these into the pile i painted over the winter to see if i can tell the difference..
#98
It was Neumann or Hönigl at a EOS-race who used one with a Durango. But they disallowed it or something.
Don't know what the the comment by Mathew was to imply. That the nose down issue (which I never had) is remedied by a wing?
If Tekno would have thought that a better balance is achieved by putting the battery back they would have changed it in the .3. It was one of the first things I checked when they had pics out.
Also what's interesting is that the new setup sheet has lower rate springs again (thank god).
Don't know what the the comment by Mathew was to imply. That the nose down issue (which I never had) is remedied by a wing?
If Tekno would have thought that a better balance is achieved by putting the battery back they would have changed it in the .3. It was one of the first things I checked when they had pics out.
Also what's interesting is that the new setup sheet has lower rate springs again (thank god).
#99
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 625
From: Atlanta, Ga
I had never really thought much about the wings on my buggies before that. Pretty much just installed them when I built the kits and then forgot about them.
-Chris
#100
I ran a wing a few times at the track on my sct410 with the evo body was better, went through entire truck freed up my suspension and changed over to delrin inserts single oring and delrin pistons and the truck was 100 different truck. Make sure your suspension is free moving. Helped me a ton.
#101
Tekno reps themselves will mention modifying the battery tray concerning the nose down issue to move the battery back to help with the problem.
Part of it also could be relative to how often its seen, and who knows, maybe this new suspension geometry will help things as to me, its more of an issue on tracks where the common fixes cause traction issues due to the stiffness of the springs.
But if tekno ever decides to revise the tray so you can have that full range, i'll get it.
#102
It was Neumann or Hönigl at a EOS-race who used one with a Durango. But they disallowed it or something.
Don't know what the the comment by Mathew was to imply. That the nose down issue (which I never had) is remedied by a wing?
If Tekno would have thought that a better balance is achieved by putting the battery back they would have changed it in the .3. It was one of the first things I checked when they had pics out.
Also what's interesting is that the new setup sheet has lower rate springs again (thank god).
Don't know what the the comment by Mathew was to imply. That the nose down issue (which I never had) is remedied by a wing?
If Tekno would have thought that a better balance is achieved by putting the battery back they would have changed it in the .3. It was one of the first things I checked when they had pics out.
Also what's interesting is that the new setup sheet has lower rate springs again (thank god).
Thanks for the insight sir.

#104





219Likes
