Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric Off-Road
Tekno RC SCT410.3 Thread >

Tekno RC SCT410.3 Thread

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Old 12-31-1969, 04:00 PM
R/C Tech Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by:
Print Wikipost
Like Tree219Likes

Tekno RC SCT410.3 Thread

Old 12-31-1969, 04:00 PM
R/C Tech Forums Expert How-Tos and Guides
Last edit by:
Print Wikipost
Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-23-2015 | 08:20 PM
  #91  
TheCore's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 801
From: New Jersey
Default

the j concepts f250 body might do what you're looking for

TheCore is offline  
Old 03-23-2015 | 08:30 PM
  #92  
Slotmachine's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 5,823
From: Germantown Maryland
Default

Originally Posted by TheCore
the j concepts f250 body might do what you're looking for

I agree.................this body jumps very well due to the angled cut outs in the rear, it acts like a wing. I just picked up another one.
Slotmachine is offline  
Old 03-23-2015 | 09:17 PM
  #93  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 625
From: Atlanta, Ga
Default

Originally Posted by TheCore
the j concepts f250 body might do what you're looking for

Wow, that is pretty much exactly what I had in mind. I think I'll be ordering one of those to try.
iScream is offline  
Old 03-24-2015 | 12:52 AM
  #94  
nanoverse's Avatar
Tech Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 650
Default

Originally Posted by iScream
Wow, that is pretty much exactly what I had in mind. I think I'll be ordering one of those to try.
The longest lasting body I have owned. Whole year worth of racing.

The only thing I don't like is the side portrutions because tires rub against it. The body would be perfect with more clearance on the sides and the ass little shorter for the Tekno.
nanoverse is offline  
Old 03-24-2015 | 04:42 AM
  #95  
Mikeand22's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Nov 2013
Posts: 449
From: Columbia, SC
Default

I was wondering if anyone was using shorty packs in their SCT's or using standard size packs? Thanks
Mikeand22 is offline  
Old 03-24-2015 | 04:46 AM
  #96  
TheCore's Avatar
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (45)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 801
From: New Jersey
Default

i have one painted up and ready to go too. i've been really digging the evo body this year, but threw one of these into the pile i painted over the winter to see if i can tell the difference..
TheCore is offline  
Old 03-24-2015 | 04:51 AM
  #97  
Motorman007's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,422
Default

Anyone have a photo of a truck with a wing please?
Motorman007 is offline  
Old 03-24-2015 | 05:03 AM
  #98  
nanoverse's Avatar
Tech Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 650
Default

Originally Posted by Motorman007
Anyone have a photo of a truck with a wing please?
It was Neumann or Hönigl at a EOS-race who used one with a Durango. But they disallowed it or something.

Don't know what the the comment by Mathew was to imply. That the nose down issue (which I never had) is remedied by a wing?

If Tekno would have thought that a better balance is achieved by putting the battery back they would have changed it in the .3. It was one of the first things I checked when they had pics out.

Also what's interesting is that the new setup sheet has lower rate springs again (thank god).
nanoverse is offline  
Old 03-24-2015 | 06:18 AM
  #99  
R/C Tech Elite Member
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 625
From: Atlanta, Ga
Default

Originally Posted by nanoverse
Don't know what the the comment by Mathew was to imply. That the nose down issue (which I never had) is remedied by a wing?
I believe a wing could make a big difference as long as it's positioned in the air stream. The first time I took my D413 to the track I didn't have the wing cut out so I dropped it on the track and took off without it. It was nosing over very similar to what my SCT410 does if I try to drive it "normal". As soon as I put the wing on that went away.

I had never really thought much about the wings on my buggies before that. Pretty much just installed them when I built the kits and then forgot about them.

-Chris
iScream is offline  
Old 03-24-2015 | 06:36 AM
  #100  
Jtipsy's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,358
From: St. Peters, MO
Default

I ran a wing a few times at the track on my sct410 with the evo body was better, went through entire truck freed up my suspension and changed over to delrin inserts single oring and delrin pistons and the truck was 100 different truck. Make sure your suspension is free moving. Helped me a ton.
Buffy1 likes this.
Jtipsy is offline  
Old 03-24-2015 | 06:54 AM
  #101  
Cain's Avatar
Tech Legend
iTrader: (304)
 
Joined: May 2002
Posts: 35,028
From: West Fargo, North Dakota
Default

Originally Posted by nanoverse
... If Tekno would have thought that a better balance is achieved by putting the battery back they would have changed it in the .3. It was one of the first things I checked when they had pics out.
If referring specifically to the nose down problem, Tekno may not necessarily change the battery tray if the mod doesn't cost you anything to do versus them redoing the mold for the battery tray.

Tekno reps themselves will mention modifying the battery tray concerning the nose down issue to move the battery back to help with the problem.

Part of it also could be relative to how often its seen, and who knows, maybe this new suspension geometry will help things as to me, its more of an issue on tracks where the common fixes cause traction issues due to the stiffness of the springs.

But if tekno ever decides to revise the tray so you can have that full range, i'll get it.
Cain is offline  
Old 03-24-2015 | 08:05 AM
  #102  
Motorman007's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,422
Default

Originally Posted by nanoverse
It was Neumann or Hönigl at a EOS-race who used one with a Durango. But they disallowed it or something.

Don't know what the the comment by Mathew was to imply. That the nose down issue (which I never had) is remedied by a wing?

If Tekno would have thought that a better balance is achieved by putting the battery back they would have changed it in the .3. It was one of the first things I checked when they had pics out.

Also what's interesting is that the new setup sheet has lower rate springs again (thank god).

Thanks for the insight sir.




Motorman007 is offline  
Old 03-24-2015 | 08:08 AM
  #103  
Motorman007's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (89)
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 3,422
Default

Do the wing needs to be straight up and down like the 2nd photo? or a angle?
Motorman007 is offline  
Old 03-24-2015 | 09:35 AM
  #104  
Matthew_Armeni's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Master
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,900
From: Temecula
Default

Originally Posted by Mikeand22
I was wondering if anyone was using shorty packs in their SCT's or using standard size packs? Thanks
I'm currently running shorties, but my truck weighs just under 6lbs RTR.
Matthew_Armeni is offline  
Old 03-24-2015 | 09:38 AM
  #105  
lford's Avatar
Tech Initiate
 
Joined: Jul 2012
Posts: 42
Default

+1 on the JC F250 body I have been using it since it came out. Very durable and the rear wing really makes a difference.
lford is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.