Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Associated RC 12 R5.2 >

Associated RC 12 R5.2

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree24Likes

Associated RC 12 R5.2

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 08-22-2013 | 06:41 AM
  #526  
dr_hfuhuhurr's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (98)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,000
From: Westchester, NY
Default

Originally Posted by Mach10_shooter
How's the durability of those?
dr_hfuhuhurr is online now  
Old 08-22-2013 | 08:56 AM
  #527  
TeamCody's Avatar
Tech Rookie
 
Joined: Aug 2013
Posts: 13
Default

Originally Posted by Monti
It's pretty good out of the box. I never run stiffer than silver side springs most times it's green or black. I most always use 10k in the side tubes and a protoform AMR body.

The car is a bit on the heavy side, I would recommend getting aluminum screws from fastener express.

I also cut a 2mm thick chassis for the 12r5.2. It saves 12 grams of total weight on the car. I still sell them if you are interested at a later point.

Monti
Great, I will keep that in mind. Thanks for the info.
TeamCody is offline  
Old 09-05-2013 | 01:23 AM
  #528  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 788
From: Lexington, Ky
Default

Delete

Last edited by bmcallister; 09-05-2013 at 09:11 PM.
bmcallister is offline  
Old 09-10-2013 | 12:22 AM
  #529  
Spillertwo's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Jan 2002
Posts: 254
Default

Which body are you guys using ? When i look at the setup sheets i see mostly the Protoform AMR ? The Profotorm TR-12 apparantly is not so popular ?
Spillertwo is offline  
Old 09-10-2013 | 04:37 PM
  #530  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (77)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 2,167
From: Southern California
Default

Originally Posted by Spillertwo
Which body are you guys using ? When i look at the setup sheets i see mostly the Protoform AMR ? The Profotorm TR-12 apparantly is not so popular ?
AMR here.
goin2drt is offline  
Old 09-13-2013 | 12:09 PM
  #531  
jetnjme's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (19)
 
Joined: Nov 2007
Posts: 1,176
From: Sacramento, CA
Default

picked mine up from Speedworld last week, i love new kits.
jetnjme is offline  
Old 09-25-2013 | 05:56 PM
  #532  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 788
From: Lexington, Ky
Default

Are the 12r5.1 and 12r5.2 rear pods the same? I am wanting to put a team tamale pod on my 5.2 and the pod they list says 5.1. Thanks
bmcallister is offline  
Old 09-26-2013 | 11:52 AM
  #533  
Logi Maker's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (59)
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 6,263
From: Pacific NW
Default

Originally Posted by bmcallister
Are the 12r5.1 and 12r5.2 rear pods the same? I am wanting to put a team tamale pod on my 5.2 and the pod they list says 5.1. Thanks
Yes...it will fit.
Logi Maker is offline  
Old 10-03-2013 | 03:04 PM
  #534  
dr_hfuhuhurr's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (98)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,000
From: Westchester, NY
Default

Has anyone balanced their rear pod? Anyone have a write-up on how to do it?

Saw this on the Speedmerchant Rev8 thread:
http://www.rctech.net/forum/12601011-post50.html

What's needed to balance the rear pod?
dr_hfuhuhurr is online now  
Old 10-03-2013 | 06:53 PM
  #535  
chevtech23's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 462
From: Everett WA
Default

Originally Posted by Spillertwo
Which body are you guys using ? When i look at the setup sheets i see mostly the Protoform AMR ? The Profotorm TR-12 apparantly is not so popular ?
I use the AMR, i run 17.5 stock. i have a tr12 but havent tried it yet, friends who have tried it report that its too much drag and the car is too "stuck" with it where we race
chevtech23 is offline  
Old 10-07-2013 | 12:41 PM
  #536  
dr_hfuhuhurr's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (98)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 5,000
From: Westchester, NY
Default

I took a couple good hits to the front left side. That side has developed some extra "droop" you could say. There's more play in that side of the car. Nothing broken, nothing is bent, what I think happened was the plastic balls in the front arm and upper link have been "stretched".

Anyone else experience this in the past? I'm going to replace the upper link first to see if that fixes it.
dr_hfuhuhurr is online now  
Old 10-07-2013 | 01:45 PM
  #537  
Pulse_'s Avatar
Tech Champion
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,100
From: Brussels, Belgium
Default

anyone using a kimbrough servo saver (white) and s9650 servo?

I'm trying to figure out what type of screw I should use to fix the servo saver on the servo considering the head of the stock screw caming with the s9650 is too large for the hole..

thanks!
Pulse_ is offline  
Old 10-07-2013 | 05:04 PM
  #538  
Tech Rookie
 
Joined: Nov 2012
Posts: 10
From: Michigan
Default

Originally Posted by dr_hfuhuhurr
I took a couple good hits to the front left side. That side has developed some extra "droop" you could say. There's more play in that side of the car. Nothing broken, nothing is bent, what I think happened was the plastic balls in the front arm and upper link have been "stretched".

Anyone else experience this in the past? I'm going to replace the upper link first to see if that fixes it.
Sounds like a collapsed spring, if your track is running clockwise the left front spring tends to collapse and cause it to have more droop.
Joe Trandell is offline  
Old 10-12-2013 | 02:54 AM
  #539  
Tech Apprentice
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 66
From: Norway
Default

Originally Posted by dr_hfuhuhurr
Has anyone balanced their rear pod? Anyone have a write-up on how to do it?

Saw this on the Speedmerchant Rev8 thread:
http://www.rctech.net/forum/12601011-post50.html

What's needed to balance the rear pod?
Is it necessary to balance the rear pod? It will not transfer uneven wheight to the chassis. On the other hand, a balanced pod is useful when you put the whole car on spikes...
oddski is offline  
Old 10-13-2013 | 10:46 AM
  #540  
Tech Fanatic
 
Joined: Jun 2005
Posts: 900
Default

Originally Posted by oddski
Is it necessary to balance the rear pod? It will not transfer uneven wheight to the chassis. On the other hand, a balanced pod is useful when you put the whole car on spikes...
It is not necessary to balance a rear pod. There was a whole discussion about this on a thread here that I can't find now. Lots of people gave lots of theories... until Mike Blackstock wrote that he had tried this and his car handled better with the standard set-up than with a balanced pod! The conversation then stopped...

As the weight of the whole pod and motor sits on three points it will distribute the weight pretty much evenly across the tyres and the centre pivot. In any event, all the weight goes to the chassis goes through the centre pivot into the chassis, and so any uneveness in the balance will only affect rear tyres, not chassis balance. If the car takes off straight, and pulls evenly out of left and right turns then the motor torque is getting evenly to the tyres and all is well. Modern cars are very good on pod balance as standard, so don't worry. HTH
SlowerOne is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.