Community
Wiki Posts
Search

RC10B4.1 FT/WC

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-02-2012 | 07:05 PM
  #23386  
YankeeFan123's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (73)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,218
From: San Diego, California
Default

Originally Posted by associatevalley
How about a sc10.1?
More than likely now
YankeeFan123 is offline  
Old 11-02-2012 | 07:19 PM
  #23387  
rimracker's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (14)
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 695
From: Southington CT
Default C rating = BS.

The following was taken from an article in RC Driver mag.

see the whole article here. http://www.rcdriver.com/rcd/index.ph...attery-safety/


LING: Technically, it means the relative charge and discharge capability. For simplicity, take the capacity in amp hours and multiply it by the C rating. So for a 5 amp hour battery, 1C = 5 amps, 2C = 10 amps etc. The discharge C rating is the maximum continuous discharge rating that a cell can handle. There are no industry standards which define when a cell fails a C rating, whether it’s the number of cycles, ending temperature, capacity, etc.

In the RC world, the C rating means next to nothing. I can pretty much guarantee you that just about every RC LiPo would self destruct when discharged at the C rating on the label unless it’s a short burst. For a 5000mAh battery, a 40C discharge is 200 amps. A complete discharge at 40C would last exactly 1.5 minutes There is absolutely no RC application that dumps the battery in just 1.5 minutes. A genuine Deans connector starts melting at 80 amps continuous – a fake Dean fails at even less.

TONY: Well, I always figured some of those numbers were a bit exaggerated. I’m assuming sticking to a quality, brand name battery is probably the best way to get an accurate C-rated pack. Other than that, is there any way to determine a quality pack vs. a cheap pack besides price?
rimracker is offline  
Old 11-02-2012 | 07:30 PM
  #23388  
elex300's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (111)
 
Joined: Oct 2011
Posts: 4,622
From: Florida
Default

I would'nt look for a B4.2. An industry person I know very well has seen the pics of the B5. Not saying its next out but it is for real. He said it looks just like the all the other aluminum chassis buggies that are out now but thats all he could tell me.
elex300 is offline  
Old 11-02-2012 | 08:03 PM
  #23389  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (25)
 
Joined: May 2012
Posts: 199
Default

Hey guys, I'm on a quest for knowledge and I've spent an hour searching things that affect the rear roll center. A popular mod is to shave the U-brace and use the "C" hubs. Sometimes these are done independently, but I've read a lot of people do both, and this confuses me.

The "C" hubs lower the roll center

The Shaved U-brace raises the roll center

So unless I'm missing something these mods cancel out and the entire link moves down making it less effective at controlling the suspension. (smaller moment arm)

Why not use the "A" hubs and just add washers to the U-brace to lower the roll center?

I'm sure I'm oversimplifying here. I can appreciate the added adjustability, but is there anything that I'm missing?
Thanks
Tom
tperazzo is offline  
Old 11-02-2012 | 08:34 PM
  #23390  
YankeeFan123's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (73)
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 3,218
From: San Diego, California
Default

Originally Posted by tperazzo
Hey guys, I'm on a quest for knowledge and I've spent an hour searching things that affect the rear roll center. A popular mod is to shave the U-brace and use the "C" hubs. Sometimes these are done independently, but I've read a lot of people do both, and this confuses me.

The "C" hubs lower the roll center

The Shaved U-brace raises the roll center

So unless I'm missing something these mods cancel out and the entire link moves down making it less effective at controlling the suspension. (smaller moment arm)

Why not use the "A" hubs and just add washers to the U-brace to lower the roll center?

I'm sure I'm oversimplifying here. I can appreciate the added adjustability, but is there anything that I'm missing?
Thanks
Tom
Did you search earlier in this thread? It was discussed for a good few pages..
YankeeFan123 is offline  
Old 11-02-2012 | 09:15 PM
  #23391  
Tradin Paint's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Mar 2012
Posts: 1,301
From: Mesa, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by elex300
I would'nt look for a B4.2. An industry person I know very well has seen the pics of the B5. Not saying its next out but it is for real. He said it looks just like the all the other aluminum chassis buggies that are out now but thats all he could tell me.
We will see the high profile drivers racing a new buggy well before one is released. As of last weekend Maifield was running what looked to me as a normal B4.1. No new buggy release is in the short term.
Tradin Paint is offline  
Old 11-02-2012 | 10:20 PM
  #23392  
Mini-Mod's Avatar
Tech Addict
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 578
From: Santa Rosa,CA
Default

I wouldn't expect anything like a b5 right now. Both Ryans like the current platform too much for it to change. Updates like bigbores are great, but a whole new chassis doesn't seem likely.
Mini-Mod is offline  
Old 11-03-2012 | 07:36 AM
  #23393  
MikeXray's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (73)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,754
From: New York
Default

Why do the AE setup sheets lack so many settings? For example there is no check for the rear tower for A or B (cav's setup says C, but don't see that available) Rear toe is missing (the block), front spindle position (fwd/rear), etc

When they say "shaved the u brace flat" is that the section where the ballstud mounts shaved to be level with the rest?
MikeXray is offline  
Old 11-03-2012 | 07:59 AM
  #23394  
J_Bone's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Dec 2004
Posts: 1,070
From: Mesa, AZ
Default

Originally Posted by MikeXray
Why do the AE setup sheets lack so many settings? For example there is no check for the rear tower for A or B (cav's setup says C, but don't see that available) Rear toe is missing (the block), front spindle position (fwd/rear), etc

When they say "shaved the u brace flat" is that the section where the ballstud mounts shaved to be level with the rest?
Yes.
J_Bone is offline  
Old 11-03-2012 | 08:17 AM
  #23395  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

toe is 3-2 unless otherwise stated. people almost never move the steering blocks. And for the hubs, I dunno. The procs run C unless otherwise stated
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 11-03-2012 | 08:21 AM
  #23396  
Just1More's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (11)
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 426
From: Bremerton, WA
Default

Originally Posted by MikeXray
Why do the AE setup sheets lack so many settings? For example there is no check for the rear tower for A or B (cav's setup says C, but don't see that available) Rear toe is missing (the block), front spindle position (fwd/rear), etc

When they say "shaved the u brace flat" is that the section where the ballstud mounts shaved to be level with the rest?
People run 2.5 or 3.0 rear toe, C tower is the carbon fiber one which is done with the shaved brace and usually 1 washer. The front spindle position is forward, but if you convert to front hex the position is not adjustable...So yup.
Just1More is offline  
Old 11-03-2012 | 08:30 AM
  #23397  
Suspended
iTrader: (12)
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 1,990
Default

Originally Posted by Wildcat1971
toe is 3-2 unless otherwise stated. people almost never move the steering blocks. And for the hubs, I dunno. The procs run C unless otherwise stated
How do you get 2 degree of rear toe? Who have you ever seen that was fast run 2 degree rear toe?
PFKAOG is offline  
Old 11-03-2012 | 08:35 AM
  #23398  
MikeXray's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (73)
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 5,754
From: New York
Default

Ok thanks.
MikeXray is offline  
Old 11-03-2012 | 08:49 AM
  #23399  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (50)
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 3,595
From: Covington, La.
Default

Originally Posted by PFKAOG
How do you get 2 degree of rear toe? Who have you ever seen that was fast run 2 degree rear toe?
i think he was referring to 3* toe and 2* antisquat
micrors4guy is offline  
Old 11-03-2012 | 09:09 AM
  #23400  
Matt Ward's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (23)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 597
From: New Bloomfield, PA
Default

Originally Posted by micrors4guy
i think he was referring to 3* toe and 2* antisquat
That is what he was referring too.
Matt Ward is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.