![]() |
I found an unboxing video of one as well. It is in Japanese but I am sure the videos are coming.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbBo5KBrF4o |
Two Rx's, really. Good ole US consumer getting screwed again.
|
Proud 4pxr owner here and I'm always the first to go for the latest and greatest but there ain't no way in hell I'm upgrading (is it really and upgrade? 🤔) to the 7px. All I see is a stick with what looks to be an iPhone pouch attached to it. No sex appeal for me, no deal.
|
Originally Posted by rubezzz
(Post 15004151)
Proud 4pxr owner here and I'm always the first to go for the latest and greatest but there ain't no way in hell I'm upgrading (is it really and upgrade? 🤔) to the 7px. All I see is a stick with what looks to be an iPhone pouch attached to it. No sex appeal for me, no deal.
|
Anyone knows what is the weight of this radio compare to 4px-R?
|
Out of interest does anyone know a rough date they are expecting to his Australia?? Apparently banzai in Japan are already stocked
|
I gave up and got a M12S.
|
Originally Posted by raved007
(Post 15004691)
Anyone knows what is the weight of this radio compare to 4px-R?
|
As claimed by the Futaba website the 7PX is only faster if you use TFHSS-SR receiver with no telemetry in conjunction with SR mode compatible Futaba S bus 2 servos. In fact 7PX with TFHSS-SR is slower than FASST when using standard digital servos.....
I have been suspecting that Sanwa and Futaba had already hit the physical limit of the 1.5ms or 1,520 µ neutral servo communication standard can provide a while back and had to modify the servo communication standard to get less latency. Futaba finally came out with their version of SSR and made a 760 µ standard for the new servos. Essentially the radio is not really worth an update unless you buy the SR capable servo with it. It's quite interesting that Futaba called their communication standard SR which is very similar to Sanwa's SSR. |
I am not sure that FASST will be faster (look at the tests on this forum) but agree on communication standard. I found info on Futaba web page that servos (BLS series) has to be updated (firmware) to use new T-FHSS SR protocol.
|
Originally Posted by Macio4ever
(Post 15010422)
I am not sure that FASST will be faster (look at the tests on this forum) but agree on communication standard. I found info on Futaba web page that servos (BLS series) has to be updated (firmware) to use new T-FHSS SR protocol.
Overview & Features - 7PX 2.4GHz T-FHSS Super Response 7-Channel Surface System - Futaba |
It is only true (according to the images) for normal digital servos. On BLS it will look different imho. Also there is no T-FHSS w/o telemetry. There is no point to use SR mode with servos not supporting SR mode so charts are a bit misleading. I do more believe in this: http://www.rctech.net/forum/radio-el...m-results.html as my humble experience is similar to results shown in the table.
The question is how long 4PX will have to wait for the firmware (if any, if possible) upgrade with SR protocol... :) |
Originally Posted by Macio4ever
(Post 15010543)
It is only true (according to the images) for normal digital servos. On BLS it will look different imho. Also there is no T-FHSS w/o telemetry. There is no point to use SR mode with servos not supporting SR mode so charts are a bit misleading. I do more believe in this: http://www.rctech.net/forum/radio-el...m-results.html as my humble experience is similar to results shown in the table.
The question is how long 4PX will have to wait for the firmware (if any, if possible) upgrade with SR protocol... :) |
5 Attachment(s)
Its came Yesterday Pretty nice
|
Hey Jason,
Where did you get it? are you in the US? |
| All times are GMT -7. It is currently 12:58 PM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.