Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree1Likes
  • 1 Post By skrib21

LIHV batteries.

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2017, 06:30 PM
  #1  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
 
mac853's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dirty place
Posts: 1,981
Default LIHV batteries.

Could somebody explain, please:
Since IFMAR just allowed using LIHV but with charged until 8.4V.
If LIHV still is overwhelming LIPO, just same or even worse.

Best regards
mac853 is offline  
Old 03-02-2017, 07:00 PM
  #2  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (39)
 
EbbTide's Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Bay Area, Ca
Posts: 4,264
Trader Rating: 39 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by mac853
Could somebody explain, please:
Since IFMAR just allowed using LIHV but with charged until 8.4V.
If LIHV still is overwhelming LIPO, just same or even worse.

Best regards
They just require a voltage of 8.4v. Lihv batteries are no more dangerous than regular Lipos either. Not too sure what you're asking.
EbbTide is offline  
Old 03-02-2017, 08:16 PM
  #3  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
 
mac853's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dirty place
Posts: 1,981
Default

I mean, if LIHV has any advantage in the performance since charge the same voltage as LIPO.
I even saw TRION and Muchmore has released also LIHV batteries.
mac853 is offline  
Old 03-03-2017, 06:01 AM
  #4  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
JRSlash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 982
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

I have the Protek 8500mAh 100c batteries and I can't really notice any additional power from .2VDC on my 4wd SCT. Now, Before I struggle to get 10 minute runs and last time at the track I can easily run 14 minutes with it charged at 8.60. Note that if you charge at 8.4 not just the voltage but the capacity goes down as well. i.e. mines are 8500mAh @ 8.60V but they are 7600mAh @ 8.4V.

P.S. The tracks I run. no one cares about LiHv batteries and even people run 3s on their trucks. I still lap them on 2s tho. 3S SCT is not faster but longer run time which I now can achieve with my LiHv batteries.
JRSlash is offline  
Old 03-03-2017, 06:12 AM
  #5  
Tech Master
Thread Starter
 
mac853's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: Dirty place
Posts: 1,981
Default

Originally Posted by JRSlash
I have the Protek 8500mAh 100c batteries and I can't really notice any additional power from .2VDC on my 4wd SCT. Now, Before I struggle to get 10 minute runs and last time at the track I can easily run 14 minutes with it charged at 8.60. Note that if you charge at 8.4 not just the voltage but the capacity goes down as well. i.e. mines are 8500mAh @ 8.60V but they are 7600mAh @ 8.4V.

P.S. The tracks I run. no one cares about LiHv batteries and even people run 3s on their trucks. I still lap them on 2s tho. 3S SCT is not faster but longer run time which I now can achieve with my LiHv batteries.
In fact this is what i am looking to ensure.
From 8.6 down to 8.4 would really affect battery capacity and car run.

Thanks!
mac853 is offline  
Old 03-10-2017, 02:12 PM
  #6  
Tech Adept
 
sleddriver's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Spokane, WA
Posts: 114
Default

Originally Posted by JRSlash
I have the Protek 8500mAh 100c batteries and I can't really notice any additional power from .2VDC on my 4wd SCT. Now, Before I struggle to get 10 minute runs and last time at the track I can easily run 14 minutes with it charged at 8.60. Note that if you charge at 8.4 not just the voltage but the capacity goes down as well. i.e. mines are 8500mAh @ 8.60V but they are 7600mAh @ 8.4V.

P.S. The tracks I run. no one cares about LiHv batteries and even people run 3s on their trucks. I still lap them on 2s tho. 3S SCT is not faster but longer run time which I now can achieve with my LiHv batteries.
I'm assuming you mean not faster around the track because they can't control the power. 3S in the same KV/turn motor will be way faster than 2S unless you get a lower KV motor to give similar RPM.
sleddriver is offline  
Old 03-11-2017, 08:05 PM
  #7  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: stockton
Posts: 350
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by mac853
Could somebody explain, please:
Since IFMAR just allowed using LIHV but with charged until 8.4V.
If LIHV still is overwhelming LIPO, just same or even worse.

Best regards
I honestly cant tell the difference. I have a icharger 406duo and it shows ir readings.. the fantom shorty I have is like 5 milliohms at 8.4 and the reedy zapper is 2.8 milliohms when charged to 8.7. On the track in my 13.5 b6 the power feels the same.. Having said that I will keep buying lihv just because of the lower ir readings.
carpetburner is offline  
Old 03-13-2017, 10:26 AM
  #8  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (32)
 
skrib21's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Le Mars Iowa
Posts: 345
Trader Rating: 32 (100%+)
Default

It would interesting to see someone do a back to back track test with a standard lipo vs a HV lipo.Or even a discharge voltage test. If anyone knows of this being done point me to the thread.
carpetburner likes this.
skrib21 is offline  
Old 03-13-2017, 11:29 AM
  #9  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (7)
 
JRSlash's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Posts: 982
Trader Rating: 7 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by sleddriver
I'm assuming you mean not faster around the track because they can't control the power. 3S in the same KV/turn motor will be way faster than 2S unless you get a lower KV motor to give similar RPM.
cant or not supposed to run 3s on anything over 4000Kv which is what most 2s racers use. Any motor rated for 3s is below 4000Kv. I do get what you are saying and is true... Straight line speed is faster but I have raced with a few ppl running 3s and they are fast but not "I cant keep up" fast. BTW, I run the 550 4300Kv HW motor paired to a XR8 SCT pro esc on my SCTE 2.5 geared 15/40.
JRSlash is offline  
Old 03-13-2017, 03:33 PM
  #10  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 211
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by skrib21
It would interesting to see someone do a back to back track test with a standard lipo vs a HV lipo.Or even a discharge voltage test. If anyone knows of this being done point me to the thread.

I have done a few tests both with 1s and 2s batteries, I was very disappointed with the hv lipo.
The hvac liposuction only showed more voltage for the first 15 seconds, then the voltage stayed the same as the regular lipo.
eazy70 is offline  
Old 03-13-2017, 05:24 PM
  #11  
Dan
Tech Champion
iTrader: (75)
 
Dan's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 6,332
Trader Rating: 75 (100%+)
Default

If charging to 8.4V, won't be much of a difference, even under high amp charging.

What will make a bigger difference is the IR of the battery, regardless whether it is LiHV or not. I had a LiHV that performed worse than my regular packs, because the IR was higher.

Quality of cells > LiHV
Dan is offline  
Old 03-13-2017, 06:55 PM
  #12  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (8)
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Location: stockton
Posts: 350
Trader Rating: 8 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by skrib21
It would interesting to see someone do a back to back track test with a standard lipo vs a HV lipo.Or even a discharge voltage test. If anyone knows of this being done point me to the thread.
My time sheets show that I literally hit 9.89 on the current layout with both batteries. My times vary bye less then .09 on the computer. I do not have a thread going but this is betweena fantom standard shorty to a reedy zapper lihv .
carpetburner is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.