Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Radio and Electronics
Plotting Packs in excel with Hyperion exports >

Plotting Packs in excel with Hyperion exports

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Plotting Packs in excel with Hyperion exports

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-19-2013 | 07:41 PM
  #1  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default Plotting Packs in excel with Hyperion exports

Well, I was bored and wanted to show a little plot I made. My gens ace is 18 months old and has an IR of about 3, the turnigy is new and has an IR of 4. The gensace is also a lower C rating, but has more mah. Anyway, here is the graph. Also, discharge was 5amp and took over an hour. The numbers ar the bottom are seconds, lol. yes 3800 seconds. I dont feel like converting to minutes, etc



Uploaded with ImageShack.us

Last edited by Wildcat1971; 11-20-2013 at 05:38 AM.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 11-19-2013 | 07:50 PM
  #2  
AndrewTom's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Nov 2011
Posts: 1,429
From: Thousand Oaks, CA
Default

just goes to prove how good gens ace packs are.
is the 4200 you tested a shorty?
AndrewTom is offline  
Old 11-20-2013 | 02:44 AM
  #3  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,569
From: My house.
Default

Check the plot lines WildCat,they're labeled wrong
Do you have any additional info like average voltage?
30Tooth is offline  
Old 11-20-2013 | 04:46 AM
  #4  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

the avg voltage for any given time point is higher on the gensace also. I was very supprised. to top it off, the gensace gave out 5001 mah on discharge to 3.0v per cell and the turnigy put out 4150. Other name brand packs were short on mah by 300-500. the companies to me that was normal.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 11-20-2013 | 04:52 AM
  #5  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

doh, your corrct, the gensace is the old pack. and the turnigy was the new one. otherwise the plots are correct.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 11-20-2013 | 05:38 AM
  #6  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

I fixed the labels and added my 1 year old promatch to the graph also. Its a 65c pack with an IR of 5.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 11-20-2013 | 06:13 AM
  #7  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Sep 2010
Posts: 3,569
From: My house.
Default

Good work,I'm thinking the Nano hasn't broke in yet so let's see. I'll contribute with a discharge to 7.4v on a puffed IP5600.
IP 5600 @ 5A dsc 'till 7.4v:
mAh 1039
AVG 7.630
IR 87
TIM

Last edited by 30Tooth; 11-20-2013 at 02:25 PM.
30Tooth is offline  
Old 11-21-2013 | 07:13 AM
  #8  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 180
From: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Default

What time was the discharge completed at? I am asking because the discharge time in the graph is 1hour and you were at 5amps so I am surprised you didn't get down to sub 7 V within the hour for a 5.1 Ah pack, because it looks half full at the end of the hour.
nitro-rob is offline  
Old 11-21-2013 | 07:24 AM
  #9  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 180
From: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Default

Call me crazy but I am certain the capacity difference between the batteries is important at that low of a discharge rate. I would expect a larger capacity battery to have a slower voltage drop under an identical load to a smaller capacity battery. 5A is not nearly a large enough draw to push these batteries to depletion and cause significant voltage drop.

For a rough calculation, at 5A discharge:
5.1A battery at ~3800s is at the same voltage the 4.2A battery is at 3200s.

4.2/5.1*100= 83%

3200/3800*100=84%

So the 4.2Ah battery achieved the voltage of the 5.1Ah battery in ~16% less time, the same different in their capacities. This is measured at the half full voltage at the end of the chart where differences in voltage drop would be expected to be more sensitive to when the packs are full. This quick relationship holds throughout the curve at earlier points as well.
nitro-rob is offline  
Old 11-21-2013 | 07:37 AM
  #10  
mkiiina's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (71)
 
Joined: Jul 2007
Posts: 2,415
From: Frisco TX
Default

Originally Posted by nitro-rob
Call me crazy but I am certain the capacity difference between the batteries is important at that low of a discharge rate. I would expect a larger capacity battery to have a slower voltage drop under an identical load to a smaller capacity battery. 5A is not nearly a large enough draw to push these batteries to depletion and cause significant voltage drop.

For a rough calculation, at 5A discharge:
5.1A battery at ~3800s is at the same voltage the 4.2A battery is at 3200s.

4.2/5.1*100= 83%

3200/3800*100=84%

So the 4.2Ah battery achieved the voltage of the 5.1Ah battery in ~16% less time, the same different in their capacities. This is measured at the half full voltage at the end of the chart where differences in voltage drop would be expected to be more sensitive to when the packs are full. This quick relationship holds throughout the curve at earlier points as well.
I was thinking something similiar. It would be more beneficial to see the same capacity over time. I think that the comparison to the promatch is a better comparison as the capacity only about ~5% different.
mkiiina is offline  
Old 11-21-2013 | 08:08 AM
  #11  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 180
From: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Default

I agree, the pro match battery starts to drop off below 8V, after the first 30% or so which is consistent with its higher resistance.
nitro-rob is offline  
Old 11-21-2013 | 08:18 AM
  #12  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by 30Tooth
Good work,I'm thinking the Nano hasn't broke in yet so let's see. I'll contribute with a discharge to 7.4v on a puffed IP5600.
IP 5600 @ 5A dsc 'till 7.4v:
mAh 1039
AVG 7.630
IR 87
TIM
how did you measure IR? because that number seems high.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 11-21-2013 | 08:25 AM
  #13  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

Originally Posted by nitro-rob
I agree, the pro match battery starts to drop off below 8V, after the first 30% or so which is consistent with its higher resistance.
yeah, my charger wont do it for me, but i have a 15amp discharger from my NIMH days. I also have a viper proguage to watch the voltage and cell balance. So I can manually gather the data and plot it. I found a few IR calculation online also, but the numbers are vastly different than my chargers. I always thought my charger used the 5amp load to check the IR, but I am thinking it used a resister that always checks the IR at the same load and it might be far below the 5amp discharge or the 15 amp charge. I want to pick up a watt meter and track what my actual max amp draw is. Once I know my max peak draw, then I can do an accurate test for my car. The watt meters only go up to 130amps, so i am sure its fine for 2wd buggy, unsure on sc 4x4 or 8th scale. I think I might be suprised how how low the max current in my 17.5 buggy is. I am guessing around 20-25amps. I already know my avg is around 15amps. I based that on how much capacity I drain over a 6minute race.
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 11-21-2013 | 08:27 AM
  #14  
Wildcat1971's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Prophet
iTrader: (84)
 
Joined: Apr 2012
Posts: 17,389
From: Arizona
Default

also, I think the IR equation is Discharge current / (start voltage - voltage under load) = IR . Can anyone verify?
Wildcat1971 is offline  
Old 11-21-2013 | 08:45 AM
  #15  
Tech Adept
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 180
From: Cambridge, Ontario, Canada
Default

R = V0-V/I
nitro-rob is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.