Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Radio and Electronics
AMB's update of decoder .. MRT transponders will not work >

AMB's update of decoder .. MRT transponders will not work

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

AMB's update of decoder .. MRT transponders will not work

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2013 | 07:18 AM
  #46  
JimmyG's Avatar
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 471
From: Taylor, MI
Default

Originally Posted by Pulse_
I there any way to verify if the transponder is a "hybrid" version of the RC4 just by looking at it?
I do believe the new one has 3 wires instead of 2.
JimmyG is offline  
Old 01-05-2013 | 08:23 AM
  #47  
Pulse_'s Avatar
Tech Champion
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,100
From: Brussels, Belgium
Default

Originally Posted by JimmyG
I do believe the new one has 3 wires instead of 2.
Thanks!

amainhobbies has not updated the pic then:
http://www.amainhobbies.com/product_...ed-Transponder

edit: wait.... On the mylaps website they show only two cables also for the hybrid
http://www.mylaps.com/index.php/us_e...id_transponder
Pulse_ is offline  
Old 01-05-2013 | 09:41 AM
  #48  
Bishop's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,223
From: Brisbane
Default

MyLaps are still using CAD images, though you can kind of make out a white wire in one picture of theirs.

But, at least two HK based shops now have new RC4 stock, and are showing actual pictures which show they have three wires.

I'm not real sure I like the idea of three wires on the new transponder, considering I often cut down my wires and/or slip them into a tight space, it's just more work with an extra wire, though I'll admit it's a minor gripe.
Bishop is offline  
Old 01-05-2013 | 02:49 PM
  #49  
Pulse_'s Avatar
Tech Champion
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,100
From: Brussels, Belgium
Default

or maybe mylaps just wants to confuse everybody and sell their old stock of non-hybrid transponders
Pulse_ is offline  
Old 01-05-2013 | 03:11 PM
  #50  
William "Q"'s Avatar
Tech Adept
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: May 2008
Posts: 154
Default

I use to wonder what AMB/MyLaps would do once they have maxed out on selling PT and Decoders to everyone... Now I know, they just upgrade everything and force everyone to buy the newer PT and Decoders... I say force cause if you don't, you can't race anymore... I know some clubs that can't afford the $330 decoder upgrade, they have enough issues paying the rent on the property, the power bill to run their lights and water bill to wet the track... Monopoly is a terrible thing...
William "Q" is offline  
Old 01-05-2013 | 03:28 PM
  #51  
Pulse_'s Avatar
Tech Champion
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 5,100
From: Brussels, Belgium
Default

..until a guy founds out how to hack the system . It won't last forever.
Pulse_ is offline  
Old 01-05-2013 | 09:50 PM
  #52  
Bishop's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,223
From: Brisbane
Default

Originally Posted by Pulse_
or maybe mylaps just wants to confuse everybody and sell their old stock of non-hybrid transponders
Confusion is the name of the game here...

MyLaps currently has the older 'Hybrid' RC4, and the new RC4 that will only work with RC4 firmware/decoders.

The latest going around is the Hybrid that works on any system, will be discontinued, forcing people to buy the new RC4 at some point, which in turn forces clubs to upgrade to a RC4 decoder at some point.

It's a nice little circle of MyLaps forcing a few things, while not really telling anyone what is going on.
Bishop is offline  
Old 01-06-2013 | 10:25 AM
  #53  
jmtrogers's Avatar
Tech Apprentice
iTrader: (22)
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 93
Default

I’m a little confused about what transponder I might or might not need. We race in a 5 state region and the last thing I need to worry about, is if I have the correct PT. Currently have 2 AMBrc and 2 Mylaps one of them is a backup. Should I trade in the backup for one of the newer ones? If we would happen to go where the new system is being used.
jmtrogers is offline  
Old 01-06-2013 | 12:39 PM
  #54  
Ed Anderson's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (26)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,375
From: N.J.
Lightbulb What we are hearing so far is...

Decoder............... Transponders

AMBrc........... AMB House TP,. AMB DP,. MRT iPT,. MRT PTX,. MyL rc2,. MyL rc4 (hybrid),. MyL rc4 (purcy)
AMBrc3......... AMB House TP,. AMB DP,. MRT iPT,. MRT PTX,. MyL rc2,. MyL rc4 (hybrid),. MyL rc4 (purcy)
MyLaps rc3.... AMB House TP,. AMB DP,. MRT iPT,. MRT PTX,. MyL rc2,. MyL rc4 (hybrid),. MyL rc4 (purcy)
MyLaps rc4.... AMB House TP,. AMB DP,. MRT iPT,. MRT PTX,. MyL rc2,. MyL rc4 (hybrid),. MyL rc4 (purcy)


Last edited by Ed Anderson; 01-06-2013 at 01:17 PM.
Ed Anderson is offline  
Old 01-11-2013 | 07:35 PM
  #55  
Tech Master
iTrader: (67)
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,666
Default

Has anyone from AMB/MY Laps actually confirmed any of this?

This will be ugly if some tracks don't upgrade decoders and some do. Then you may need two different transponders and have two switch as you go from track to track.
nutz4rcyktw is offline  
Old 01-14-2013 | 10:09 AM
  #56  
Tech Initiate
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 21
From: Spain
Default

Originally Posted by nutz4rcyktw
Has anyone from AMB/MY Laps actually confirmed any of this?

This will be ugly if some tracks don't upgrade decoders and some do. Then you may need two different transponders and have two switch as you go from track to track.
According to that, the conflictive models will be MRT iPT, MRT PTX, and MyLaps RC4, so if you have an old AMB DP for example, you can race in all tracks (updated or not) without problems.

On the other hand, if you have a MRT model, the best option seems to be getting a MyLaps RC4 Hybrid.


Regards.

Last edited by BeLiPoWa; 01-14-2013 at 04:50 PM.
BeLiPoWa is offline  
Old 01-15-2013 | 07:08 AM
  #57  
orcadigital's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (61)
 
Joined: Nov 2010
Posts: 2,126
From: Marietta, GA
Default

Anybody else find it ironic that in the days of $500 touring cars, $150 lipos, $250 ESC's, $100 motors, $100 servos, $25 bodies, $20 allen wrenches, $70 pit lights, etc etc that everyone gets all uppity about a $100 transponder that unlike pretty much everything else, will last for the next half dozen years?

I personally buy a lot used because of cost, but when I think about what I have invested in RC, transponders really isn't that big of a thing. And unlike everything else I own RC related, transponders actually hold their value reasonable well on the used market.

Is the cost a barrier to new people coming into RC? I think yes. But no more so then everything else. If you want to race, it's part of the cost of entry.

I own 2 hybrids, 1 of the older AMB's and a much bigger one for my 1:1 race car. It just seems like people are making a bigger deal of this then is really there.
orcadigital is offline  
Old 01-15-2013 | 07:08 PM
  #58  
Bishop's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,223
From: Brisbane
Default

Maybe, and I used to think the same, but then my car cost $330, my LiPos $35 each, ESC was $55, motor also $55, servos about $60, bodies I try to get good life from, and $20 bought me a kit of tools.

$100-$170 (yes I have seen them sell for that much) for something that serves such a simple purpose, is in stark comparison to other parts in RC that do so much more in relative terms.

They 'are' expensive for what they are, and what they do.
Bishop is offline  
Old 01-15-2013 | 09:58 PM
  #59  
66Racer's Avatar
Tech Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 307
From: Orange county, ca
Default

Originally Posted by Bishop
Maybe, and I used to think the same, but then my car cost $330, my LiPos $35 each, ESC was $55, motor also $55, servos about $60, bodies I try to get good life from, and $20 bought me a kit of tools.

$100-$170 (yes I have seen them sell for that much) for something that serves such a simple purpose, is in stark comparison to other parts in RC that do so much more in relative terms.

They 'are' expensive for what they are, and what they do.
Don't get me wrong, I wish they were $60 but it does send an encrypted signal so it reads your car and they have to pay for development. Unless there is competition prices wont change.

Now after reading this thread I better be careful which mylaps to get, MRT is out of the question
66Racer is offline  
Old 01-16-2013 | 12:38 AM
  #60  
Bishop's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Joined: May 2004
Posts: 2,223
From: Brisbane
Default

Development cost argument is near irreverent when you look at the range of MyLaps product, they use the same decoder for 'everything', and I'd guess a revision of the same transponder packaged differently for each purpose.

If they want to close up a market by re and then re-revising firmwares to lock out MRT users, you have to see that as stinging users on development cost for things that don't interest us.
Likewise I'm still yet to find anyone who cares about the new features, most everyone I have ever talked to about transponders just wishes they were cheaper.
Bishop is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.