Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Limiting kV

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-11-2011 | 08:34 AM
  #31  
Tech Regular
 
Joined: Jun 2011
Posts: 317
Default

Easy answer; No you can't change the kv of your motor without changing the motor itself. Get a smaller pinion or a different motor.
TedMosby is offline  
Old 12-11-2011 | 12:18 PM
  #32  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,465
From: Melbourne, Australia
Default

Not sure the following question has been answered

Does Castle's "Torque Limit" function work differently than simply lowering the throttle EPA ?

Guess we can ask them ..............

Cheers
crusey_aus is offline  
Old 12-14-2011 | 03:05 PM
  #33  
dtr's Avatar
dtr
Tech Master
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,671
From: budapest, hungary
Default

Originally Posted by crusey_aus
Not sure the following question has been answered

Does Castle's "Torque Limit" function work differently than simply lowering the throttle EPA ?

Guess we can ask them ..............

Cheers
Crusey, could you contact Castle?
On the rc-monster forum Patrick has said that torque control is not a direct current limiter, but controls torque directly, and in another post that they're working towards traction control, so I guess it is based on measuring phase delay of the motor.

Last edited by dtr; 12-14-2011 at 03:16 PM.
dtr is offline  
Old 12-14-2011 | 08:14 PM
  #34  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,465
From: Melbourne, Australia
Default

I dont use it but will ask the question on rc monster

Guess the better question is do all of the following have the same effect

Limiting throttle travel (EPA)
Torque Limiting
Limiting Forward Power

Cheers
crusey_aus is offline  
Old 12-15-2011 | 05:59 AM
  #35  
Eric Bryant's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 564
Default

Originally Posted by crusey_aus
Limiting throttle travel (EPA)
Torque Limiting
Limiting Forward Power
Yes - the means of accomplishing these is the same (delivering less voltage - and thus less current - to the motor winding).
Eric Bryant is offline  
Old 12-15-2011 | 06:08 AM
  #36  
Eric Bryant's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 564
Default

Originally Posted by dtr
Crusey, could you contact Castle?
On the rc-monster forum Patrick has said that torque control is not a direct current limiter, but controls torque directly
That statement makes absolutely no sense. In an "ideal" electric motor, torque is directly proportional to current, and so controlling output torque is accomplished by controlling the winding current. There are a lot of other variables that factor into this, but that's the general concept.

, and in another post that they're working towards traction control, so I guess it is based on measuring phase delay of the motor.
Uh, what? Please explain what you mean by "measuring phase delay", because that is not a term I've heard in several years of designing BLDC motors and controllers.

The most likely way to implement traction control would be to limit the rate at which the motor is allowed to accelerate. This would be rather simple to implement in software, but the calibration of it for a given setup (motor/voltage/gearing/tire size) would be pretty tricky for the average hobbyist.
Eric Bryant is offline  
Old 12-19-2011 | 10:45 AM
  #37  
dtr's Avatar
dtr
Tech Master
 
Joined: May 2011
Posts: 1,671
From: budapest, hungary
Default

Originally Posted by dtr
Crusey, could you contact Castle?
On the rc-monster forum Patrick has said that torque control is not a direct current limiter, but controls torque directly, and in another post that they're working towards traction control, so I guess it is based on measuring phase delay of the motor.
Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
That statement makes absolutely no sense. In an "ideal" electric motor, torque is directly proportional to current, and so controlling output torque is accomplished by controlling the winding current. There are a lot of other variables that factor into this, but that's the general concept.
Look up Patrick's comments in this thread, especially post #38.

Originally Posted by Eric Bryant
Uh, what? Please explain what you mean by "measuring phase delay", because that is not a term I've heard in several years of designing BLDC motors and controllers.
I mean measuring how far off the motor is from its ideal no-load position the more the difference, the higher torque it is forced on. Since the motor is sensorless, I think it can be determined by comparing phase of the the control signal and the back emf. I accept that phase delay is not the correct technical term for it, but it was my "best estimate". What would be the right phrase?

The most likely way to implement traction control would be to limit the rate at which the motor is allowed to accelerate. This would be rather simple to implement in software, but the calibration of it for a given setup (motor/voltage/gearing/tire size) would be pretty tricky for the average hobbyist.
I agree that it takes a lot of parameters to set up right, especially without an accelerometer.

Last edited by dtr; 12-19-2011 at 10:57 AM.
dtr is offline  
Old 12-19-2011 | 01:57 PM
  #38  
Tech Master
iTrader: (3)
 
Joined: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,465
From: Melbourne, Australia
Default

Had a quick scan of that thread, makes my head hurt even more

Torque Limit will not effect top speed ?

So it appears it does not have the same effect as limiting EPA or forward power

Cheers
crusey_aus is offline  
Old 12-19-2011 | 02:09 PM
  #39  
Thread Starter
Tech Initiate
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2011
Posts: 25
Default

Didn't think this would be so controversial.
I ordered some spur gears and some pinion gears and I'm going to play around with the ratios.
Thank you so much to all of you for so much information that my brain is still comprehending.

stas92 is offline  
Old 12-19-2011 | 07:17 PM
  #40  
Eric Bryant's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (46)
 
Joined: Oct 2007
Posts: 564
Default

Originally Posted by dtr
Look up Patrick's comments in this thread, especially post #38.
Thanks - that makes a lot of sense. Basically, what is being discussed here is a "feed-forward" control scheme, where a model of the motor is used to determine the required modulation index (PWM duty cycle) to achieve the desired current (which then in turn controls the amount of shaft torque). This is often much easier to implement than a feedback system, where to the winding current is measured by the controller (seems simple in concept, but is rather difficult in practice).

Note that the end result is the same - the winding current is limited in order to limit torque.

I mean measuring how far off the motor is from its ideal no-load position the more the difference, the higher torque it is forced on.
The problem with this is that any proper control algorithm (sensored or sensorless) should not allow the rotor to "lag" as more torque is applied.
Eric Bryant is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.