Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Radio and Electronics
Interpreting lipo ir numbers >

Interpreting lipo ir numbers

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree9Likes
  • 2 Post By rhodopsine
  • 1 Post By Sabin
  • 2 Post By trilerian
  • 2 Post By DirkW
  • 1 Post By gigaplex
  • 1 Post By billdelong

Interpreting lipo ir numbers

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-06-2023 | 02:57 PM
  #1  
sn47som1's Avatar
Thread Starter
Tech Master
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Mar 2010
Posts: 1,586
Default Interpreting lipo ir numbers

What is the acceptable lipo internal resistance number range per cell or in total, to decide whether a lipo is past its good performance window and/or life span?
sn47som1 is offline  
Old 12-06-2023 | 03:17 PM
  #2  
Tech Addict
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 569
From: Montréal, Qc
Default

Originally Posted by sn47som1
What is the acceptable lipo internal resistance number range per cell or in total, to decide whether a lipo is past its good performance window and/or life span?
I think it depends on the device you use to measure the IR. I personally use an i-charger 406 and I found that when batteries get over 2.2 ohm, they seem to start to lack punch. That's the threshold I use, but it's also based on the data I get from my charger. Yours might yield different results.

Martin Paradis
sn47som1 and gigaplex like this.
rhodopsine is offline  
Old 12-06-2023 | 06:16 PM
  #3  
gigaplex's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,761
From: Melbourne, VIC
Default

Strongly depends on the charger, cables, battery form factor, temperature etc. Ignoring those caveats, typical 2 cell standard sized packs, ideally between 1-3 per cell. Shorties, ultra thin packs, or the extra thick packs, tend to have a higher baseline, so 2-5 per cell.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 12-06-2023 | 09:44 PM
  #4  
Tech Master
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,627
Default

Originally Posted by sn47som1
What is the acceptable lipo internal resistance number range per cell or in total, to decide whether a lipo is past its good performance window and/or life span?
Fresh packs from reputable manufacturers should show just under to just over 1 mOhm per cell.
Slashripper likes this.
Sabin is offline  
Old 12-07-2023 | 07:10 AM
  #5  
Tech Addict
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 569
From: Montréal, Qc
Default

Originally Posted by Sabin
Fresh packs from reputable manufacturers should show just under to just over 1 mOhm per cell.
That is really dependent on the device you use to make the measurement and it's calibration. I have an i-Charger and I've never seen IR under 1.5 mOhm. It's possible that my device needs recalibration but then as long as I use this as to compare the performance of my batteries over time, it doesn't really matter.
rhodopsine is offline  
Old 12-07-2023 | 07:22 AM
  #6  
Roelof's Avatar
Tech Lord
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 14,052
From: Holland
Default

It all depends what motor you are using. If you run modified with low turns motors then yes, you want a low IR for the max punch and speed. With high turns motors the current draw is much lower and so the voltage loss over the internal resistance is also much lower. The main electric class I drive is 1/10 scale F1, my packs in a good condition have 3 mOhm per cell and my bad packs have cells of about 8 mOhm and it is hard to notice the difference on the used 21.5T motor.
Roelof is offline  
Old 12-07-2023 | 08:48 AM
  #7  
trilerian's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (51)
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,393
From: Lexington KY
Default

Originally Posted by Roelof
It all depends what motor you are using. If you run modified with low turns motors then yes, you want a low IR for the max punch and speed. With high turns motors the current draw is much lower and so the voltage loss over the internal resistance is also much lower. The main electric class I drive is 1/10 scale F1, my packs in a good condition have 3 mOhm per cell and my bad packs have cells of about 8 mOhm and it is hard to notice the difference on the used 21.5T motor.
It is interesting that those are your findings. It has been my experience, and of course one persons experience in not a universal truth, that batteries make more of a difference than motors for spec racing.

I use the Wayne Giles ESR (not a true ESR meter, it is his acronym) meter to check my batteries. I have one of original units, the newer one have more features. I check my batteries at room temp for comparisons. When you check them on a charger you are checking them when they are heating up a bit and this lowers the IR. You'll find generally with a charger that the discharge cycle will have a lower IR than charging. Well, that is if you are charging at 10-15 amps and discharging at 30-40 ams (model dependent). Some will say their batteries are 1mΩ/cell this is usually during a 40A discharge cycle. My good batteries will generally read around 2.0-2.4mΩ/cell (i've had a couple that get down to 1.8mΩ/cell) when charging at 12A and at room temp on my ESR meter they will read between 4-5mΩ/cell.
sn47som1 and gigaplex like this.
trilerian is offline  
Old 12-07-2023 | 09:03 AM
  #8  
DirkW's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Dec 2013
Posts: 2,904
From: Germany
Default

I'd also argue that mod, while certainly drawing more power than stock from the battery, doesn't rely on an optimal battery as much, since even a "normal" quality battery can provide enough power. Stock however, is much more limited by blinky ESCs and low power stock motors, so people chase after every bit of extra power / punch they can find, including the batteries.
gigaplex and Slashripper like this.
DirkW is offline  
Old 12-07-2023 | 09:11 AM
  #9  
gigaplex's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,761
From: Melbourne, VIC
Default

Originally Posted by Roelof
It all depends what motor you are using. If you run modified with low turns motors then yes, you want a low IR for the max punch and speed. With high turns motors the current draw is much lower and so the voltage loss over the internal resistance is also much lower. The main electric class I drive is 1/10 scale F1, my packs in a good condition have 3 mOhm per cell and my bad packs have cells of about 8 mOhm and it is hard to notice the difference on the used 21.5T motor.
You don't need a punchy battery for mod. They have an abundance of punch.
Slashripper likes this.
gigaplex is offline  
Old 12-07-2023 | 09:29 AM
  #10  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (33)
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 6,410
From: Austin,TX
Default

IR is a variable based on quality of battery and capacity. For a typical race grade pack in the 5Ah range a brand new pack might measure all cells below 1 mΩ, and then as the pack ages/degrades you will slowly see the IR increase over time... anything below 3 mΩ is still considered "low IR" but I start to notice pack swelling and degradation of performance (fade, etc) as soon as any individual cell goes past 7 mΩ... it's a very subtle difference and is hard to tell if you use the same pack and that's where having an IR Meter helps you decide when to retire a pack. I might still keep an aged pack for practice up until any cell hits 15mΩ but at that point I typically toss them out or give them away. I have also found that when any cell is farther than 1-2 mΩ apart, then the pack tends to take longer to balance and that's when I may consider selling the pack provided the cells are still below 7mΩ... I make sure to post IR readings of any packs that I sell and I would refuse to buy any used pack without IR readings so you understand the current condition of the pack!

Basher grade packs tend to start out around 5mΩ so it's all relative to your starting point.

I always check my IR readings immediately after a full charge, I also get lower IR readings when pumping/cycling the batteries as well.
sn47som1 likes this.
billdelong is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.