Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Radio and Electronics
Transponder location >

Transponder location

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Transponder location

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-16-2017 | 07:22 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Tech Adept
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 192
Default Transponder location

Will I experience any issues if I mount my transponder directly on top of my receiver?
RookieRacer00 is offline  
Old 11-16-2017 | 07:30 AM
  #2  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 706
From: Reidsville N.C.
Default

No you shouldn’t. The directions say not to mount it directly to an aluminum or carbon chassis plate. I’ve mounted them just about everywhere with out issue. Just keep in mind they don’t like carbon. You can even mount them vertically on the back of a Servo case without issue.
Jwilliams5 is offline  
Old 11-16-2017 | 07:45 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Tech Adept
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Feb 2016
Posts: 192
Default

Originally Posted by Jwilliams5
No you shouldn’t. The directions say not to mount it directly to an aluminum or carbon chassis plate. I’ve mounted them just about everywhere with out issue. Just keep in mind they don’t like carbon. You can even mount them vertically on the back of a Servo case without issue.
Ok, thanks!
RookieRacer00 is offline  
Old 11-16-2017 | 09:41 AM
  #4  
Roelof's Avatar
Tech Lord
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 14,052
From: Holland
Default

Ehm... A transponder is also a transmitter. Yes, it is on a compleet different frequency but is still creating a magnetic field arround it which can have an influence on the receiver working or receiver signal strength when mounted on to of the receiver...

If you face problems like glitches, range issues or drop outs first you need to remove the transponder.

And yes, I have seen issues with transponders close to receivers.
Roelof is offline  
Old 11-16-2017 | 11:06 AM
  #5  
racer1812's Avatar
Super Moderator
iTrader: (31)
 
Joined: Nov 2008
Posts: 15,743
From: RIP 'Chopper', 4/18/13 miss you bud:(
Default

You'll need to test it for yourself. AMBrc, MRT, or MyLaps PT?

I've NEVER seen anyone mount any PT ON a receiver, ever. So I can't comment on that. I have seen people have issues mounting a MyLaps vertical in one car but not in another. MyLaps, iirc, tells you to mount them flat (horizontal). I run AMBrc PT's both horizontal and vertical mounted on servos without issue. I also see all different brands of PT's mounted to aluminum and CF chassis's work without issues. Try it and see what happens. If you get glitches or miss laps, move the PT.
racer1812 is offline  
Old 11-16-2017 | 12:46 PM
  #6  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 706
From: Reidsville N.C.
Default

You guys should look more closely at pics of the pros cars. Many of them mount them on the side and top of the receivers with super short wires. The idea behind it is when they get a new car or switch chassis in a race, it’s one less thing to have to setup again. Just my .02

Pics are all over the net.
Jwilliams5 is offline  
Old 11-16-2017 | 01:01 PM
  #7  
Roelof's Avatar
Tech Lord
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 14,052
From: Holland
Default

And those pro drivers have all the knowedge about radio technology?

Ofcourse, when it works it is fine, that is the standard aswer from most people but mounting a transmitter on top of a receiver is asking for problems. These guys do build a car to perfection and take care of no binding in what ever but stick the transponde in a way which is far from perfection.
Also mounting vertical is asking for problems, it will give a weak counting signal and going to far to the side of the track can cause a missing lap (and I have seen that happen also).
Roelof is offline  
Old 11-16-2017 | 01:09 PM
  #8  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 421
Default

Best location: on top of the motor.
faqcya is offline  
Old 11-16-2017 | 03:37 PM
  #9  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 706
From: Reidsville N.C.
Default

Originally Posted by faqcya
Best location: on top of the motor.

Hahaha. At least some one other myself is finding this amusing!
Jwilliams5 is offline  
Old 11-16-2017 | 03:44 PM
  #10  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 421
Default

Lmao
faqcya is offline  
Old 11-16-2017 | 03:53 PM
  #11  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Feb 2010
Posts: 421
Default

Originally Posted by Roelof
Ehm... A transponder is also a transmitter. Yes, it is on a compleet different frequency but is still creating a magnetic field arround it which can have an influence on the receiver working or receiver signal strength when mounted on to of the receiver...

If you face problems like glitches, range issues or drop outs first you need to remove the transponder.

And yes, I have seen issues with transponders close to receivers.
Could you please explain how either of these 2 transmitters can create a magnetic field.
faqcya is offline  
Old 11-16-2017 | 04:06 PM
  #12  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 706
From: Reidsville N.C.
Default

Dying on the floor laughing! I mean I guess I can see where he is coming from. If we had outdated radios, knock off recievers... or anything else crazy it may cause a problem. But the phrase “unlimited 2.4ghz models can run at once” does come to mind. And he stated that it’s on a different frequency already so that kind of contradicts both statements. I have been racing for quite a while. And I am in no way saying freaky stuff can’t happen. All I know is that in my tekno(mounted on top of the receiver) in my Mugen (mounted inside the radio box with the receiver) an on both my B6’s mounted on the Servo sideways I have never had an issue with interference or weak signal.

Can weird stuff happen, yes. Have I experienced it using up to date cars, servos, esc’s, motors, radios any of the above.... no, not when using common sense and testing many variations of all of the above. Heck I even raced indoors at an all concrete warehouse surrounded by concrete in every direction with up to a 100 radios/cars participating at events for 3 years and no one had issues. Furthermore I worked there and built over 20 different tracks there along with 2 other employees and a couple bobcats.

Again can freaky stuff happen, yes. But again I have never experienced this personally in many, many vehicles/and combinations.
Jwilliams5 is offline  
Old 11-16-2017 | 04:29 PM
  #13  
howardcano's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (37)
 
Joined: Jan 2012
Posts: 3,784
From: Olathe, KS
Default

Originally Posted by faqcya
Could you please explain how either of these 2 transmitters can create a magnetic field.
All radio frequency energy has electric and magnetic field components. (That's also true of other electromagnetic radiation, such as light!) Transponders are much more effective at creating the magnetic component than the electric component since they work prinicipally by induction.

I think racer1812 had the best observations so far. The very short version is: It isn't a problem until it IS a problem. When it proves problematic, it doesn't hurt to go back to basics, like mounting the transponder as the manufacturer recommends.
howardcano is offline  
Old 11-16-2017 | 04:46 PM
  #14  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (27)
 
Joined: Jan 2016
Posts: 706
From: Reidsville N.C.
Default

Agreed
Jwilliams5 is offline  
Old 11-16-2017 | 11:05 PM
  #15  
gigaplex's Avatar
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Joined: Dec 2015
Posts: 7,765
From: Melbourne, VIC
Default

Originally Posted by Jwilliams5
But the phrase “unlimited 2.4ghz models can run at once” does come to mind.
Spectrum/bandwidth isn't infinite. You can't run an infinite number of 2.4GHz models.
gigaplex is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.