Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Radio and Electronics
RCHourglass DIY Lap Timing (AKA Cano revised) >

RCHourglass DIY Lap Timing (AKA Cano revised)

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree157Likes

RCHourglass DIY Lap Timing (AKA Cano revised)

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-07-2018, 12:13 AM
  #211  
Tech Regular
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 304
Default

To make the program start so it responds as a USB serial port you need at least to connect the 5MHz crystal and the two capacitors C4 and C5.
mv4wd is offline  
Old 05-07-2018, 01:17 AM
  #212  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: Nov 2017
Posts: 10
Default

Originally Posted by mv4wd
To make the program start so it responds as a USB serial port you need at least to connect the 5MHz crystal and the two capacitors C4 and C5.
I thought that by programming the PSOC and connecting it to the serial port, I could check that it would work ok.
thank you fot the support
Kalvo is offline  
Old 05-11-2018, 02:32 AM
  #213  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sweden
Posts: 86
Default



I have managed to make a working copy of the black original amb loop box. The blue is the original box and yellow is the copy. It is a bit less in signal strength but it works. The schematics that I have on my project site from a few years back was wrong and did not work. But now I have made a change so it works. It can have some improvements made probably to get closer to the same signal strength. Will redraw schematics in the week to come and update the schematics in my github project.

Is this something of interest to the RCHourglass project or is the active parts enought?
condac is offline  
Old 05-11-2018, 12:45 PM
  #214  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: St-Legier
Posts: 61
Default

Originally Posted by condac


I have managed to make a working copy of the black original amb loop box. The blue is the original box and yellow is the copy. It is a bit less in signal strength but it works. The schematics that I have on my project site from a few years back was wrong and did not work. But now I have made a change so it works. It can have some improvements made probably to get closer to the same signal strength. Will redraw schematics in the week to come and update the schematics in my github project.

Is this something of interest to the RCHourglass project or is the active parts enought?
Hello, I have try the LM319 version ( with un original AMB Mx transponder ):
on a loop 1m10x0.69 I have a detection to 5m without problem
on the 10mx0.7m loop, the detection is 0.5m I think I have to change the capacitor from 47pf to 12 pf

the 10m loop has an L = 28uH, the 1m10 loop 4.8uH.

All the test i have done are with the wire only on the grass, not a real MX line.

Here are some interesting link:

Loop antena calculator: http://www.dl0hst.de/magnetlooprechner.htm

other but in French: http://alloza.eu/david/WordPress3/?p=24

https://www.vfdb.org/aktuell/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/Article_pa0rdt-Mini-Whip.pdf


thor
mroc is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 04:03 AM
  #215  
Tech Regular
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 304
Default

Originally Posted by condac
Is this something of interest to the RCHourglass project or is the active parts enought?
I don't know how this input box works (is it a filter/impedance match, active or passive). Does it work with phantom power from the decoder?
mv4wd is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 04:13 AM
  #216  
Tech Regular
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 304
Default

Originally Posted by mroc
Hello, I have try the LM319 version ( with un original AMB Mx transponder ):
Does this work at 3.58 MHz? I think it might be possible to change the timebase of the decoder, but maybe some of the capacitors need to be tuned. Also it's not confirmed that the preamble and packet have the same size/meaning or RC transponders.
Have you been able to capture some packets with the scope?
I think MX and Kart transponders have a higher supply voltage with a ferrite coil to produce stronger fields. Also I'm afraid for such a short range the normal 'antenna' formula might not be of help. The model is more that of a small field inducing current on one of the two wires. The transponder in the middle of the loop causes the lower signal since the two wires voltages cancel each other. Of course capacitors and inductance of the loop control the sensitivity that should be max at carrier frequency.
mv4wd is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 04:28 AM
  #217  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sweden
Posts: 86
Default

Originally Posted by mv4wd
I don't know how this input box works (is it a filter/impedance match, active or passive). Does it work with phantom power from the decoder?
It is just a impedance match with a filter to remove some frequency. I have updated the schematics now https://github.com/condac/openAST/bl...box_schema.png it is super simple as you can see. It is a crime to sell these for 200$...
condac is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 04:40 AM
  #218  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sweden
Posts: 86
Default

When I compared the loop box in real world on our track, the home built had double the signal strength in the timing software. And the view in the scope had higher signal also. So it works great as replacement for original AMB RC3 decoder atleast.
condac is offline  
Old 05-14-2018, 01:00 PM
  #219  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: St-Legier
Posts: 61
Default

Originally Posted by mv4wd
Does this work at 3.58 MHz? I think it might be possible to change the timebase of the decoder, but maybe some of the capacitors need to be tuned. Also it's not confirmed that the preamble and packet have the same size/meaning or RC transponders.
Have you been able to capture some packets with the scope?
I think MX and Kart transponders have a higher supply voltage with a ferrite coil to produce stronger fields. Also I'm afraid for such a short range the normal 'antenna' formula might not be of help. The model is more that of a small field inducing current on one of the two wires. The transponder in the middle of the loop causes the lower signal since the two wires voltages cancel each other. Of course capacitors and inductance of the loop control the sensitivity that should be max at carrier frequency.

Hello,
The signal power are the same as i can see ( Amp Tranx 160 / 0951678 ). I will try to use a mixer ad831A to adjust the frequency from 3.58 to 5 Mhz. I think if i use an 1.42 Mhz signal to transpose the frequency.
The only problem will be the preamble ...

The pic transponder work with this https://www.bechronized.com/motocross-mx-supercross-sx-1 system,

But i don't understood how it works, has i have seen, the loop send a busk 125khz signal, and the transponder return a 5 Mhz bask signal, modulated on a 315Mhz carrier (chip are: 5150 cpu and ??? )

Thor
mroc is offline  
Old 05-17-2018, 11:29 AM
  #220  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 5
Smile loop

Hi Guys - at first many greetings from germany and a great respect to all involved in this great project!

The original loopbox is a balun: this smart board converts the unbalanced to balanced signal on 75ohm Cable - with filtering of noise. With it you can use up to 100m signal cable between loop and decoder without any amplyfier.
I rebuild my own loopbox with same signal quality like original one... tested on RC3 RC4 and alternate decoders...
My question is to use this instead the amplifier on the decoder described here - because most tracks have the mylaps loop and box installed here and need only an alternate decoder system....like this interesting project here...

kind regards
Danny

Last edited by DannyRC2; 05-17-2018 at 10:29 PM.
DannyRC2 is offline  
Old 05-18-2018, 06:23 AM
  #221  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: St-Legier
Posts: 61
Default

Originally Posted by DannyRC2
Hi Guys - at first many greetings from germany and a great respect to all involved in this great project!

The original loopbox is a balun: this smart board converts the unbalanced to balanced signal on 75ohm Cable - with filtering of noise. With it you can use up to 100m signal cable between loop and decoder without any amplyfier.
I rebuild my own loopbox with same signal quality like original one... tested on RC3 RC4 and alternate decoders...
My question is to use this instead the amplifier on the decoder described here - because most tracks have the mylaps loop and box installed here and need only an alternate decoder system....like this interesting project here...

kind regards
Danny
Hello,

I the schematics public ? Today i check the lm319 amps. without the condensator on the loop, signal from my transponder, with a ferrit antennae with same inductance as the normal is
allmost four time more powerful as the standard AMB TX transponder fully charged.

Thor
Attached Files
File Type: pdf
Amplifier_LM319.pdf (19.4 KB, 410 views)
mroc is offline  
Old 05-18-2018, 08:13 AM
  #222  
Tech Regular
Thread Starter
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 304
Default

Originally Posted by DannyRC2
My question is to use this instead the amplifier on the decoder described here - because most tracks have the mylaps loop and box installed here and need only an alternate decoder system....like this interesting project here...
Wellcome aboard. It should be tested if the phantom power does not upset the balun and the impedance and signal level match. I'll try to build the balun and see the results. It would be nice to work with both loops if possible
mv4wd is offline  
Old 05-21-2018, 01:45 AM
  #223  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sweden
Posts: 86
Default

EDIT: i didnt remember that i already posted this...
Here are the schematics for the working loop box i made: https://github.com/condac/openAST/ra...box_schema.png
condac is offline  
Old 05-24-2018, 01:42 AM
  #224  
Tech Rookie
 
Join Date: May 2018
Posts: 5
Default

I mean there is a missing Resistor in your loop condac... If you measure the original box you will get 100kOhm on RG59 output side and also on loop input side...
thats the missing resistor maybe your box gets than stronger signal.

My self designed box works with 15 nF and 2x 1nF and the original core 6:14 measured with mylaps up to 200 hits in 1m testing loop not under ground, in real race approx 120 - 160 hits

The original core couldnt detect yet but has measured Douside 10.27mm Dinner 5.75mm x High 3.85mm (Da 0.404inch Di 0.226inch H 0.151inch) and no color.
I have tried a T44-2 core but hits 60-100....not acceptable. i must investigate what core its exactly is - any hints????
DannyRC2 is offline  
Old 05-24-2018, 02:00 AM
  #225  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Sweden
Posts: 86
Default

Originally Posted by DannyRC2
I mean there is a missing Resistor in your loop condac... If you measure the original box you will get 100kOhm on RG59 output side and also on loop input side...
thats the missing resistor maybe your box gets than stronger signal.

My self designed box works with 15 nF and 2x 1nF and the original core 6:14 measured with mylaps up to 200 hits in 1m testing loop not under ground, in real race approx 120 - 160 hits

The original core couldnt detect yet but has measured Douside 10.27mm Dinner 5.75mm x High 3.85mm (Da 0.404inch Di 0.226inch H 0.151inch) and no color.
I have tried a T44-2 core but hits 60-100....not acceptable. i must investigate what core its exactly is - any hints????
I removed the 100kOhm on the loop side because when I measure my original there is no resistance at all on the input....
condac is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.