Engine Mods

Old 10-18-2006 | 08:18 PM
  #106  
mugenb46's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,385
From: springfield tn
Default

the full face on the crank is interesting, i'm sure ther is a good reason for this but i don't understand the thought behind this type of design, but it is not filled in behind as you can see
mugenb46 is offline  
Old 10-18-2006 | 11:28 PM
  #107  
gtrmx's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 230
From: Guadalajara, Mexico
Default

Originally Posted by EdwardN
Get the weight of piston, conrod, wrist pin, G-clips take about 51% (make bobe out of heavy materila lead or something) attached to cranck and follow the rest from Nitrodude balancing procedure and if you will be able to go as close as possible-then you will be right on the money.
Hi EdwardN!!

May I ask why 51% of the weight and not 50% or even 100%?

It is hard for me to picture that in my mind! It would occur to me that the counterweight should balance the whole weight of piston, rod, wrist pin and g-clips, wouldn't it?

Isn't it like the whole weight of the piston/rod assembly is permanently attached to the crank pin, like the lead sleeve on the pin (bob), and thus we should account for 100%?

Also, if I decide to cut the crankshaft, then that means I must remove weight from the piston or rod accordingly? I imagine that is why EB Mods cuts the rods as well.

Thanks!
gtrmx is offline  
Old 10-19-2006 | 12:49 AM
  #108  
German Muscle's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: May 2006
Posts: 557
Default

colt has ported a few airplane motors. maybe he could be of some help, i and i doubt he has seen a motor like that.
German Muscle is offline  
Old 10-19-2006 | 10:54 AM
  #109  
EdwardN's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,168
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by gtrmx
Hi EdwardN!!

May I ask why 51% of the weight and not 50% or even 100%?

It is hard for me to picture that in my mind! It would occur to me that the counterweight should balance the whole weight of piston, rod, wrist pin and g-clips, wouldn't it?

Isn't it like the whole weight of the piston/rod assembly is permanently attached to the crank pin, like the lead sleeve on the pin (bob), and thus we should account for 100%?

Also, if I decide to cut the crankshaft, then that means I must remove weight from the piston or rod accordingly? I imagine that is why EB Mods cuts the rods as well.

Thanks!
Sure you can ask any quetions-this is why we came here in forum to learn, share etc.
Number 51% came from many years of trials and it is our numbers, it doesn't mean everybody use the same numbers. It is target number but not always can be easy reach.
BTW, try to make 100%-you won't be able to do that, regardless how much tungsten you will put there. It is doesn't metter how much you can lightening piston assembly-you can go just to reasonble limit where parts will be strong enough to don't brake under the load while motor is running 40+ K RPM. Ones you will make them srong enough they will have some weight.
One of the reason why in air models (there is space to do it) some people try and do carb on opposite side, but we don't have that luxery. Tehere is way to make better way to do balancing-use rear induction-you can locate induction position that it will help achive best balancing with minimum unbalanced rotating mass ( way lesss then we use front induction), but again it is depend of aplication-some place is possible, some not. Please see the pics of samples.
Balancing is whole hell of controversial ideas and theories and people stick with something they find work better for them.
BTW, look the pic of sleeve-it is art of work!!!!
Attached Thumbnails Engine Mods-combat1.jpg   Engine Mods-teamracing.jpg   Engine Mods-tn_f1c2s.jpg   Engine Mods-sleeve.jpg  
EdwardN is offline  
Old 10-19-2006 | 11:11 AM
  #110  
EdwardN's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,168
From: SoCal
Default

Hi MugenB.
That one is really old motor-that balancing on cranck was popular because on that time idea was that cuts which we have now on cranck will increase case volume, so everybody was making those cuts and some times even put sleeve over it to cover cuts. But later it was proven that web regardless the shape at rotating in our RPM is concidered as full round body, so after it was proven, everybody switched to DELTA type ( or alomost everybody ).
As far as engine-pics are really not focused, but for sure what I will do is make the cuts which going from transfer ports to booster-it will be firstTo make sure mixture passage is good to all ports, second I will do is to make chamfer on induction hole ( or you can make turbo scoop). Will make sure that booster angle is at list 45 degrees.
Try to make please more focused pics of the side of sleeve where we can see transfer ports and booster.
EdwardN is offline  
Old 10-19-2006 | 12:06 PM
  #111  
gtrmx's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Sep 2005
Posts: 230
From: Guadalajara, Mexico
Default

Originally Posted by EdwardN
Sure you can ask any quetions-this is why we came here in forum to learn, share etc.
Number 51% came from many years of trials and it is our numbers, it doesn't mean everybody use the same numbers. It is target number but not always can be easy reach.
BTW, try to make 100%-you won't be able to do that, regardless how much tungsten you will put there. It is doesn't metter how much you can lightening piston assembly-you can go just to reasonble limit where parts will be strong enough to don't brake under the load while motor is running 40+ K RPM. Ones you will make them srong enough they will have some weight.
One of the reason why in air models (there is space to do it) some people try and do carb on opposite side, but we don't have that luxery. Tehere is way to make better way to do balancing-use rear induction-you can locate induction position that it will help achive best balancing with minimum unbalanced rotating mass ( way lesss then we use front induction), but again it is depend of aplication-some place is possible, some not. Please see the pics of samples.
Balancing is whole hell of controversial ideas and theories and people stick with something they find work better for them.
BTW, look the pic of sleeve-it is art of work!!!!
Thanks for taking the time to answer this kind of question.

Not many people out there are willing to share this much good info!!
gtrmx is offline  
Old 10-19-2006 | 12:54 PM
  #112  
EdwardN's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,168
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by gtrmx
Thanks for taking the time to answer this kind of question.

Not many people out there are willing to share this much good info!!
You are very welcome.
It is not secret info at all-it is very well know facts in engine design world. I am not sure why people is hiding this kind of info from the community ( if they have this info), I don't see problem to help people to understand as much as possible on nitro engines.
But please understand me right-all info which I am sharing here is info which I presonaly with my firends got over the years, it doesn't mean it is mother nature laws, it just what we have learn. Some of the info is not supported by any mechanical, thermodynamical, flow etc rulls or laws, it was collected over the years and found that is the best fit. Some times we even so leasy to go and try to match some scintific development to the findings. Just found and used.
EdwardN is offline  
Old 10-19-2006 | 04:32 PM
  #113  
mugenb46's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,385
From: springfield tn
Default

ED, i just had a guy tell me that when you reduce head clearence that it will increase power and also reduce engine temp. is this accurate. in my experence it has increased temp. go to the head clearence post and see what i'm talking about please.
mugenb46 is offline  
Old 10-31-2006 | 08:57 PM
  #114  
mugenb46's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,385
From: springfield tn
Default

ED,German,Colt
can you tell me what size degree wheel i should use on my engines, does it matter, i would think so. just not sure. Thanks
mugenb46 is offline  
Old 10-31-2006 | 09:39 PM
  #115  
EdwardN's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: May 2003
Posts: 2,168
From: SoCal
Default

Originally Posted by mugenb46
ED,German,Colt
can you tell me what size degree wheel i should use on my engines, does it matter, i would think so. just not sure. Thanks
I am using this protractor http://quintgraphics.net/cart/index....2b8fdb138e119d, you can easy get from Home Depot or most hardware store. I love it because it is not 360 degrees, it is 2 X180.
It is really doesn't metter the size as long as it is handy for you to use.
EdwardN is offline  
Old 10-31-2006 | 10:05 PM
  #116  
Colt4g63's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (8)
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 610
Default

What Ed posted would work just fine. And also very cheap and easy to get ahold of.
Colt4g63 is offline  
Old 11-01-2006 | 04:45 PM
  #117  
mugenb46's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,385
From: springfield tn
Default

sorry but that link shows 2. is it the round one or the long one, and why wouldn't you not want one that is 360 compared to 180. why is that better for you thanks ed i know that boost port angles and induction angles are very important to know for the sleeve along with boost port passege angles and fuel port paseg angles in the cace of the motor. what too do i need to check those.
mugenb46 is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off


Thread Tools
Search this Thread

Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.