Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro On-Road > Onroad Nitro Engine Zone
Diffence in running 16 or 25% Nitro >

Diffence in running 16 or 25% Nitro

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

Diffence in running 16 or 25% Nitro

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-01-2012 | 06:39 AM
  #1  
Thread Starter
Tech Initiate
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 37
Default Diffence in running 16 or 25% Nitro

Hi, next year in Europe, we are to change to 16% nitro from 25%, the question is, what changes are necessary to an engine used this year (25%) to enable it to run more or less the same using 16%, next question, is anyone aware if new engines being produced now which will run on 16% without any changes to the engine and the last question is are manufactures of engines producing engines to run on just 16%.

Andy
Shepherd is offline  
Old 10-01-2012 | 09:18 AM
  #2  
Roelof's Avatar
Tech Lord
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 14,044
From: Holland
Default

Current engines will run fine on 16%, to make it better you have to take out a headshim of 0.1mm.

It is interesting to see how manufacturers will sell their engines. Will they be labeled with the nitro setting or not?
Roelof is offline  
Old 10-01-2012 | 09:57 AM
  #3  
Thread Starter
Tech Initiate
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 37
Default

Current engines will run fine on 16%, to make it better you have to take out a headshim of 0.1mm.

It is interesting to see how manufacturers will sell their engines. Will they be labeled with the nitro setting or not?

Roelf
Thanks for the reply, does this change make any difference to speed etc.
Shepherd is offline  
Old 10-01-2012 | 10:18 AM
  #4  
Roelof's Avatar
Tech Lord
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 14,044
From: Holland
Default

There was a guy who did won a Dutch national and noticed afterwards he had run it on 16%, his dad picked by accident a wrong can of fuel for the main final.

I have runned several clubraces on 16% without changing the engine and in the feeling you will not notice something, maybe a little less power in the midrange and on the laptimes you will see a 0.1 / 0.2 sec difference which can be less with the right shimming..
It is nothing to worry about, lets hope the fuel is getting cheaper with the mass production of 16%. But to think this will solve (a part of) the noise issue... No, I do not.
Roelof is offline  
Old 10-05-2012 | 03:54 AM
  #5  
JamesHealey's Avatar
Tech Addict
iTrader: (1)
 
Joined: Jul 2011
Posts: 556
From: United Kingdom
Default

My friend has been running 16% in his engine for 2 years now because it's easier to buy 16% and he's never noticed a difference and he regularly wins our club races against 25% drivers.

Don't think you will really notice much difference in performance, just remove that 0.1mm shim and away you go!
JamesHealey is offline  
Old 10-09-2012 | 10:35 PM
  #6  
Thread Starter
Tech Initiate
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 37
Default

Have just been reading the EFRA proposals for 2014 and looks like they don't want it now, I wish they would make their mind up !.
Shepherd is offline  
Old 10-10-2012 | 02:03 AM
  #7  
Roelof's Avatar
Tech Lord
 
Joined: Aug 2007
Posts: 14,044
From: Holland
Default

The 16% was already chosen last year so it is mandatory for 2013
Roelof is offline  
Old 10-10-2012 | 10:32 PM
  #8  
Thread Starter
Tech Initiate
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 37
Default

It sounds like the three chamber exhaust problem they had two ? years ago, maybe they should think, "if it ain't broke-don't fix it"
Shepherd is offline  

Currently Active Users Viewing This Thread: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)
 
Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are Off



Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.