Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree195Likes

Novarossi engines thread

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-13-2006 | 11:49 AM
  #1651  
Fsturbo15's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Apr 2005
Posts: 170
Default

LS is a short stroke, good for big tracks and long straights, LL is a long stroke, lots of torque, best for the infield where the races are won.

The 12-3Plus has a similer long stroke design to the LL thats why it also has good torque.
Fsturbo15 is offline  
Old 09-13-2006 | 06:59 PM
  #1652  
Tech Apprentice
 
Joined: Nov 2003
Posts: 80
Default

I am thinking of getting a novarossi LL3 or LS3 Murnan modified, are they worth it? and which one will have a better overall performance, I dont really race a lot I just want a fast car.
rcjayy is offline  
Old 09-13-2006 | 07:01 PM
  #1653  
wallyedmonds's Avatar
Tech Elite
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 3,662
From: Brampton ont canada
Default

Originally Posted by rcjayy
I am thinking of getting a novarossi LL3 or LS3 Murnan modified, are they worth it? and which one will have a better overall performance, I dont really race a lot I just want a fast car.
LL3
wallyedmonds is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 11:03 AM
  #1654  
mtveten's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,846
Default

I ran both an LL3 Tuned & LS3 Tuned this weeked and for me the LS was the better motor. ON track the LL3 had a slightly higher peak RPM and a could pull a little more gear at the bottom but the slower spool up made the motor overal slightly slower.

I would say the LL had more peak power, but a narrow powerband and slow spoolup in the middle.

The LS has a very broad powerband, faster spool up, and doesn't drop off as much when outside the ideal rollout.
mtveten is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 11:35 AM
  #1655  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (28)
 
Joined: Aug 2003
Posts: 4,166
From: Henderson, NV
Default

I think the LS is better in all cases. I did not like the LL engine
Scott Fisher is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 02:19 PM
  #1656  
rmdhawaii's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,806
Default

Originally Posted by mtveten
I ran both an LL3 Tuned & LS3 Tuned this weeked and for me the LS was the better motor. ON track the LL3 had a slightly higher peak RPM and a could pull a little more gear at the bottom but the slower spool up made the motor overal slightly slower.

I would say the LL had more peak power, but a narrow powerband and slow spoolup in the middle.

The LS has a very broad powerband, faster spool up, and doesn't drop off as much when outside the ideal rollout.
Thanks for the very good info comparing these two engines. How do the powerbands compare to the WASP Rev CRF? Do you have better throttle/finger control in the bottom to mid range?

Thanks!
rmdhawaii is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 03:07 PM
  #1657  
rayjay's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 209
From: Townsville, Queensland
Smile Novarossi rex rer12

How are we all going. I have a quick question for you guys.. Im looking at getting a Novarossi Rex RER12 motor. I currently have a OS 12TZ. I was wondering what your thoughts were on these two motors and how they would compare to each other.. My track is tight and twisty and i need a torque motor.. Can you give us some feedback on these two, especially the Novarossi.. Is it any good.??

Cheers
Ray
rayjay is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 04:17 PM
  #1658  
mtveten's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,846
Default

The CRF has more top end power and revs much higher than both the LL & LS but felt unresponsive at the bottom with a delayed feeling @ the top.

The CRF start out with a slow spool up that increases exponentially as the revs climb. The Nova's have a linear feel with the LL dropping just a bit in the middle compared to the LS. For me the consistent spool up speed made the LL & LS feel more responsive, consistent, & easier to drive.

People who throttle like a switch will have trouble with the Nova's instant high power response but those with better control will love the motor's precise feel through the powerband.

Mark
mtveten is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 04:21 PM
  #1659  
SalvadoriRacing's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
 
Joined: Dec 2003
Posts: 928
From: Brazil, Sao Paulo
Default

if you're going to buy the long stroke version, spend a little bit more and get the plus 12-3Ct.......fastest engine available..........
SalvadoriRacing is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 04:26 PM
  #1660  
mtveten's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (30)
 
Joined: Jan 2003
Posts: 2,846
Default

Ray if you race on a small technical track I would suggest you stay with your TZ till it fades. From my experience the smaller tracks just don't take advantage of the high dollar power. If your motor is feeling sluggish out of the corner with a good tune your problem is either clutch setup or gearing. The TZ has good torq and more power than you can use on a small track.

Mark
mtveten is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 05:14 PM
  #1661  
Osiris 75's Avatar
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (18)
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 844
From: Converse, TX
Default

Originally Posted by mtveten
Ray if you race on a small technical track I would suggest you stay with your TZ till it fades. From my experience the smaller tracks just don't take advantage of the high dollar power. If your motor is feeling sluggish out of the corner with a good tune your problem is either clutch setup or gearing. The TZ has good torq and more power than you can use on a small track.

Mark
I agree!!
Osiris 75 is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 05:17 PM
  #1662  
rayjay's Avatar
Tech Adept
 
Joined: Apr 2006
Posts: 209
From: Townsville, Queensland
Default re-motor

Cheers Mark
rayjay is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 05:19 PM
  #1663  
rmdhawaii's Avatar
Tech Elite
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Feb 2006
Posts: 3,806
Default

Thanks Mark!
rmdhawaii is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 10:45 PM
  #1664  
Tech Master
 
Joined: Oct 2005
Posts: 1,407
From: ..... still far from heaven!
Default

i just looked at novarossi website, a bit confuse because of so many type of .12 engine.

just wondering, which one is the best for high speed track with 2 sweepers?
ickvanovs is offline  
Old 09-21-2006 | 10:48 PM
  #1665  
hav_lova's Avatar
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
 
Joined: Jan 2005
Posts: 1,387
From: Sydney Model Autosports (SMA)
Default

Originally Posted by mtveten
The CRF has more top end power and revs much higher than both the LL & LS but felt unresponsive at the bottom with a delayed feeling @ the top.

The CRF start out with a slow spool up that increases exponentially as the revs climb. The Nova's have a linear feel with the LL dropping just a bit in the middle compared to the LS. For me the consistent spool up speed made the LL & LS feel more responsive, consistent, & easier to drive.

People who throttle like a switch will have trouble with the Nova's instant high power response but those with better control will love the motor's precise feel through the powerband.

Mark
I've tried 3 engines where i race i have to say by far my favourite was my tz, i'd say mostly due that its modded extremely well but the main corners on the track require a very slow pace and then theres a straight the LL3 worked extremely well for this application as the power was just there straight away but i disliked how it seemed to run out of puff about 1/2 way down the straight, my dad also tried the engine, and he also runs a modded TZ now.

You can't fault a TZ, good punch and great top end, tickled a little bit its just stunning
hav_lova is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.