Community
Wiki Posts
Search

IDM Products?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 06-06-2009, 06:09 AM
  #556  
Tech Apprentice
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Naples Italy
Posts: 58
Default

Originally Posted by stefan
Picco engines generally have more torque and less top end than Novas, but they are also better on fuel consumption.

They had a pre-pre-pre WC race in Lostallo 2 weeks ago with most of the top guns attending and Alberto Picco was once more the only one who was able to get 5 minutes on a tank.
Just like at the Euros two years ago, this might just be one of the deciding factors at this track when the worlds are on in August.

With a bit of work, you can get the topend out of a Picco, but the the fuel consumption will go up a bit as well.

I would go for the Picco and play with the gearing to reach the same top speed, simply because of the price difference.

Nova Rossis are probably the best engines out there, but the pricing structure is getting a bit ridiculous.

carletto is offline  
Old 06-06-2009, 03:12 PM
  #557  
M7H
Tech Elite
 
M7H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,198
Default

Originally Posted by xspower
No the Nova and the Picco engines not Picco and IDM. LOL
Hahaha, I'm sorry... I misunderstood your remark... don't know why, maybe it was a bit late yesterday....

Tomorrow we will run the 3rd round in the Dutch Championship, It will be a rain race, So I will not run my IDM, but a good old Novarossi RX21 speed, which is a perfect rain engine....
M7H is offline  
Old 06-06-2009, 05:43 PM
  #558  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 498
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by M7H
Hahaha, I'm sorry... I misunderstood your remark... don't know why, maybe it was a bit late yesterday....

Tomorrow we will run the 3rd round in the Dutch Championship, It will be a rain race, So I will not run my IDM, but a good old Novarossi RX21 speed, which is a perfect rain engine....

No Problem.
xspower is offline  
Old 06-10-2009, 03:08 AM
  #559  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
Join Date: Jul 2003
Posts: 498
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

We would like to congratulate Maxy from Maxy's pro racing fuel for the win at 301 with the IDM EVO3 .21 engine. Congratulations on your win Maxy. Seems you have been winning a lot lately!!!!!
xspower is offline  
Old 06-10-2009, 02:24 PM
  #560  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (91)
 
GMartinez's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Sunshine State
Posts: 8,451
Trader Rating: 91 (100%+)
Default

Congrat's on the win Maxy is on a role
GMartinez is offline  
Old 06-16-2009, 06:30 AM
  #561  
IQ0
Tech Adept
 
IQ0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 137
Default

what is the average time you can run (1 full tank) IDM evo3 .21 by using the noise reduction?

Last edited by IQ0; 06-16-2009 at 06:42 AM.
IQ0 is offline  
Old 06-16-2009, 07:01 AM
  #562  
M7H
Tech Elite
 
M7H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,198
Default

Originally Posted by IQ0
what is the average time you can run (1 full tank) IDM evo3 .21 by using the noise reduction?
The same as without the noise reduction, or maybe 3 seconds longer......
M7H is offline  
Old 06-16-2009, 07:18 AM
  #563  
IQ0
Tech Adept
 
IQ0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 137
Default

Originally Posted by M7H
The same as without the noise reduction, or maybe 3 seconds longer......
i thought when using it...air will be less thus fuel consumption will be less too...therefore time will be much longer..
IQ0 is offline  
Old 06-16-2009, 07:22 AM
  #564  
M7H
Tech Elite
 
M7H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,198
Default

Running with or without an INS box doesn't really make a difference in needle settings.
Also we run them already for years now, and still barely reach 5 min. on a tank.... it certainly doesn't give you "much" longer runtime....
M7H is offline  
Old 06-16-2009, 07:32 AM
  #565  
IQ0
Tech Adept
 
IQ0's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 137
Default

Originally Posted by M7H
Running with or without an INS box doesn't really make a difference in needle settings.
Also we run them already for years now, and still barely reach 5 min. on a tank.... it certainly doesn't give you "much" longer runtime....
thanks buddy!
IQ0 is offline  
Old 06-17-2009, 05:14 AM
  #566  
Tech Initiate
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 42
Default

Hello, what is your experience with evo4 .12, compare to evo3?
majk is offline  
Old 07-08-2009, 06:35 AM
  #567  
Tech Addict
iTrader: (5)
 
NitroWD's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 622
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default IDM evo3 and evo4 parts

hi,
anyone knows what parts are interchangable between .12 evo3 and evo4?
NitroWD is offline  
Old 07-08-2009, 07:16 AM
  #568  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NL
Posts: 478
Default

Originally Posted by M7H
and still barely reach 5 min. on a tank....


Are we talking about Picco or NR engines here? We only have had problems with the 2052, 2015 and 2018 exhaust on big tracks. Normally with a 2033 you can even manage 5 minutes on Lostallo.
PMSorber is offline  
Old 07-08-2009, 07:32 AM
  #569  
M7H
Tech Elite
 
M7H's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: The Netherlands
Posts: 2,198
Default

Pieter, the guy was asking how much runtime you gain with running an INS box. We were not talking about exhaust pipes...
M7H is offline  
Old 07-08-2009, 11:17 AM
  #570  
Suspended
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: NL
Posts: 478
Default

Originally Posted by M7H
Pieter, the guy was asking how much runtime you gain with running an INS box. We were not talking about exhaust pipes...
Ah... ok. What do you think about "a bit more"
Dont mention that we bearly run 5 minutes... thats heavily depending upon ones finger and a lot more points
PMSorber is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.