FX Royal Racing Engine Thread
#301
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
Hi guys,
Just wanna ask what're the run times of everyone's engine? Cuz i had a prototype(with no name on the head) before but the run time was about 7 to 7:30 mins max, i've read here that peeps are getting 9 to 10 mins even with heavy throttle finger. Just wondering if there're some improvements made for the production FX ones.
I'm asking because wanna get a nitro truggy and looking at this engine again due to the price(with ceramic bearings) and everyone's comments, but really hope the run time is improved, cheers
Just wanna ask what're the run times of everyone's engine? Cuz i had a prototype(with no name on the head) before but the run time was about 7 to 7:30 mins max, i've read here that peeps are getting 9 to 10 mins even with heavy throttle finger. Just wondering if there're some improvements made for the production FX ones.
I'm asking because wanna get a nitro truggy and looking at this engine again due to the price(with ceramic bearings) and everyone's comments, but really hope the run time is improved, cheers
Medium sized track no long straights.
#302
Tech Master
Thread Starter
Hi guys,
Just wanna ask what're the run times of everyone's engine? Cuz i had a prototype(with no name on the head) before but the run time was about 7 to 7:30 mins max, i've read here that peeps are getting 9 to 10 mins even with heavy throttle finger. Just wondering if there're some improvements made for the production FX ones.
I'm asking because wanna get a nitro truggy and looking at this engine again due to the price(with ceramic bearings) and everyone's comments, but really hope the run time is improved, cheers
Just wanna ask what're the run times of everyone's engine? Cuz i had a prototype(with no name on the head) before but the run time was about 7 to 7:30 mins max, i've read here that peeps are getting 9 to 10 mins even with heavy throttle finger. Just wondering if there're some improvements made for the production FX ones.
I'm asking because wanna get a nitro truggy and looking at this engine again due to the price(with ceramic bearings) and everyone's comments, but really hope the run time is improved, cheers
Its only the bearings thats different from ours and the engines in the stores.
What pipe do you run?
#304
Tech Elite
iTrader: (8)
If yiu guys have not tried the 2013 pipe I would suggest giving it a whirl.
I broke mine in with a Werks 2013 and have run that pipe on it only. In my opinion it is working out very well.
If someone else has a 2013 I would like your feedback on it. I have a 2058 that I wanted to try but the 2013 was pulling over the double tripple no problem and clearing a somewhat tough quad with getting over 10 min of run time so I never bothered trying the 2058.
Plus the 2013 just sounds so bad ass.
I broke mine in with a Werks 2013 and have run that pipe on it only. In my opinion it is working out very well.
If someone else has a 2013 I would like your feedback on it. I have a 2058 that I wanted to try but the 2013 was pulling over the double tripple no problem and clearing a somewhat tough quad with getting over 10 min of run time so I never bothered trying the 2058.
Plus the 2013 just sounds so bad ass.
#305
Btw, what are the pipes you guys are using now? Are the recommended pipes as good and functional as it's said to be?
#306
Tech Elite
iTrader: (67)
Mileage is mostly driver and finding a combo that works at your track. Just because you buy what Drake has doesnt make you get runtimes like him. It takes mostly a smooth throttle finger. Finding the right combo with a pipe is very important. I personally ran the Alpha 2090, it was very good but I did not test any others, runtime was around 10 minutes, above average for me at that track. Fuel used, car model, bearings being free and lots of other things come into play also.
Being the fx has lots of power modifying it for mileage would work well also. I sometimes add an insert in the crank, use exhaust restrictors etc for mileage.
Rex
Being the fx has lots of power modifying it for mileage would work well also. I sometimes add an insert in the crank, use exhaust restrictors etc for mileage.
Rex
#307
Tech Master
Thread Starter
Sorry i forgot the pipe that i used for the engine but i'm sure it's not a good one since a friend just gave it to me cheap. Thanks for reminding i think it's the pipe that made the run times so low.
Thanks a ton for the replies guys, Lille-bror asked the right question(which reminds me) about the pipe, had not thought of that before asking the question, sorry. But getting all your replies and it seems everyone is getting 10+ mins, i think i'm going with this engine again soon(still waiting for the truggy).
Btw, what are the pipes you guys are using now? Are the recommended pipes as good and functional as it's said to be?
Thanks a ton for the replies guys, Lille-bror asked the right question(which reminds me) about the pipe, had not thought of that before asking the question, sorry. But getting all your replies and it seems everyone is getting 10+ mins, i think i'm going with this engine again soon(still waiting for the truggy).
Btw, what are the pipes you guys are using now? Are the recommended pipes as good and functional as it's said to be?
#308
Mileage is mostly driver and finding a combo that works at your track. Just because you buy what Drake has doesnt make you get runtimes like him. It takes mostly a smooth throttle finger. Finding the right combo with a pipe is very important. I personally ran the Alpha 2090, it was very good but I did not test any others, runtime was around 10 minutes, above average for me at that track. Fuel used, car model, bearings being free and lots of other things come into play also.
Being the fx has lots of power modifying it for mileage would work well also. I sometimes add an insert in the crank, use exhaust restrictors etc for mileage.
Rex
Being the fx has lots of power modifying it for mileage would work well also. I sometimes add an insert in the crank, use exhaust restrictors etc for mileage.
Rex
Thanks a lot again for sharing man, so is there any clear and tested difference between the 2 pipes? Oh, maybe info on the different headers too?
#309
Tech Master
Thread Starter
#310
Like Rex said, a lot of the fuel mileage is driver/tune/header-pipe combo.
I'm on the 2108 w/ 659704 and now that the engine has about 3 gallons through it, it has really woken up.
I haven't "risked" going 10 just yet, but I know the engine has it in it. I always come back with more than enough fuel to know I can go 10, but I've always gotten burned (in the past) in some way by not making it if I have to push super hard. Not to mention, the latest tracks I've run on really like full throttle.
This past weekend, I was pitting around the 8 minute mark and my pit man said it was taking around 75cc of fuel via the gun measurement. But I was on the hammer hard.
Anyone that was at Barnstormers this weekend can vouch for the power this engine makes, yet how smooth it is to drive. I love running against modded engines in a straight line and pulling on them.
I'm on the 2108 w/ 659704 and now that the engine has about 3 gallons through it, it has really woken up.
I haven't "risked" going 10 just yet, but I know the engine has it in it. I always come back with more than enough fuel to know I can go 10, but I've always gotten burned (in the past) in some way by not making it if I have to push super hard. Not to mention, the latest tracks I've run on really like full throttle.
This past weekend, I was pitting around the 8 minute mark and my pit man said it was taking around 75cc of fuel via the gun measurement. But I was on the hammer hard.
Anyone that was at Barnstormers this weekend can vouch for the power this engine makes, yet how smooth it is to drive. I love running against modded engines in a straight line and pulling on them.
#311
Tech Master
Thread Starter
Everybody should learn how to make correct runtime calculations
#312
Lille-bror and schreff,
Thanks a ton for sharing and advising man, and also thanks for the 'Guide' Lille-bror, it helps clear things a lot, really appreciate it, cheers...and have a great run guys
Thanks a ton for sharing and advising man, and also thanks for the 'Guide' Lille-bror, it helps clear things a lot, really appreciate it, cheers...and have a great run guys
#314
Tech Master
iTrader: (17)
Roughly where are people's needles set. I'm about .3mm in from flush top and bottom on 30%
The motors are running fairly cold still, around 95-100 degrees. But im finding all my plugs are compressed up like its lean. They aren't driving like they are lean and have good smoke. If anything I'd say I could lean them out more.
Im thinking I might try adding another shim to .5mm
I just find it odd that both my motors are doing the same thing
The motors are running fairly cold still, around 95-100 degrees. But im finding all my plugs are compressed up like its lean. They aren't driving like they are lean and have good smoke. If anything I'd say I could lean them out more.
Im thinking I might try adding another shim to .5mm
I just find it odd that both my motors are doing the same thing
#315
Tech Master
on a general note, if you glowplugs looks like the filament is pushed into the glowplug, you are not lean but overcompressed. put in a 010mm shim and test again :-)