![]() |
Originally Posted by Maximo
(Post 8254215)
with 1 shim removed the B6 has slightly higher final compression,...that helps it with the bottom end.. i would have to trim the B5 button to make them identical....But it does appear the B6 has a little more torque on the 2013 when both engines have a shim removed.... stock shimming I do believe the B5 still has more torque...the B6 picked up pretty good with just removing a shim...
|
The B6 is definitely potent with a shim removed... I am working on the modded version right now !
|
Dyno of Mod Speed and Mod JL.21????
|
Originally Posted by Maximo
(Post 8254215)
with 1 shim removed the B6 has slightly higher final compression,...that helps it with the bottom end.. i would have to trim the B5 button to make them identical....But it does appear the B6 has a little more torque on the 2013 when both engines have a shim removed.... stock shimming I do believe the B5 still has more torque...the B6 picked up pretty good with just removing a shim...
Thanks Neal for sharing the info and risking the backlash you're about to receive from the loyal OS fans.....I also like how you explained removing the shim was to equalize compression ratios for testing, not to give any engine an advantage over another!:nod: |
Originally Posted by shanem121
(Post 8254249)
Dyno of Mod Speed and Mod JL.21????
|
Hey Maximo or anyone else. What do you guys prefer to run on the clocked b5?
|
Originally Posted by marshon50
(Post 8254266)
WOW!!! These numbers for a stock $200-$230 engine are incredible. It's funny that you mention removing a head shim because way back on the B5 thread Ron talked about safely gaining free HP by removing a shim if running Werks 30% fuel. I'd honestly forgotten about it til now. My engines were already flying, can't wait to see them w/o the extra shim!!!
Thanks Neal for sharing the info and risking the backlash you're about to receive from the loyal OS fans.....I also like how you explained removing the shim was to equalize compression ratios for testing, not to give any engine an advantage over another!:nod: The dyno is a very interesting tool.... even when I change my inertial flywheels the results change engine to engine...some engines pull the heavy flywheel with no issue, others fall flat on their faces.... Some engines that will not pull the heavy flywheel thrive on the lighter flywheel, and other engines don't seem to be affected...some pull the same results on both flywheel masses......... compression ratio plays a huge role in how these engines perform, IMO testing is not accurate unless the compression ratios are the same or nearly the same...one company may add an extra shim to aid breakin, another may not..of course the engine with the higher compression will show better results..that is a big issue I always had with the magazine testings, they always ran the engines with 100% stock shimming and on the same tuned pipe....So one engine could show way better then another all because of setup..with my testing I try to optimize each engine as best I can in stock configuration..i set the compression ratio and find the most suited tuned pipe...many offroad engines come from factory with the head shimming very conservative, which can really hurt the power output an skew the results to make the engine look weaker then it really is..... I am not too worried about backlash...I have nothing to hide and will always try to show the show the results of my testing as accurately and honestly as I can...... |
Originally Posted by marshon50
(Post 8254277)
And while your at it, what about the Team Orion Alpha, the engine that just won the Worlds....
|
|
oops
|
Thanks Neal. Those are some good looking numbers over the JL. My Choice has just been made. :ha::p
|
1
|
Originally Posted by Maximo
(Post 8254144)
here is the B6 vs Speed and B5 vs Speed...... I have had my dyno setup with both a light inertial mass and a heavy inertial mass...but due to issues with my drive gear breaking I had to retire the heavy flywheel...my original B5 testing was done on the heavier flywheel...the new testing of the engines has been done on the lighter flywheel........ The weight of my flywheel mass changes the engines curve on the graph, even with recalibrating the software the results have changed some........So now that I have settled on the lighter flywheel mass I will go back and retest all the engines I have tested..... FYI all my black dyno graphs are done with the latest dyno configuration...
Now because all the manufacturers shim their engines differently the final compression ratio's will be different...in my testing I try to equalize the compression ratio of all the engines tested...the stock XZB Speed comes with 7.9/1 compression, the stock B5 and B6 are closer to 7.3/1...by removing 1 thin head shim the B5 ends at 7.9/1 and the B6 at 8.0/1 here is dyno comparisons of the B5 vs Speed and B6 vs Speed, on my current dyno configuration and compression ratio's equalized...... For my testing it is critical to have the compression ratio's equalized, these graphs were for my own testing, but I figured I would post them anyways.. http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m...vsSpeedCRE.jpg http://i107.photobucket.com/albums/m...thstockCRE.jpg Looking at the charts I think that a bit of the drop off especially on the tail end at higher RPM's with our engine is due to the use of a steel bearing versus ceramic. Switching to a ceramic bearing in the B6 should provide a noticeable reduction in friction which will probably increase the overall max HP and Torque numbers further as well as increase/extend them on the back and of the curve. It's also interesting to see that the graph with the 2057 pipe set is almost a perfect parabolic arch! It's nearly perfectly smooth which I think is what greatly contributes to the engine being so drivable, smooth and the very linear feel that the B6 gives. Again interesting information and thank you for posting this for all of us to see. Ron |
Originally Posted by Werks
(Post 8254383)
Thanks Neal for posting the B6 chart. I guess this explains why we felt we had more power when we were at the Worlds than any of the other engines out there lol! Looking at the chart it is interesting to see that irrelevant of which of our pipe design is run on our B6 we are still making more maximum HP and between 2-11% more torque than the new Speed engine, especially when you factor in the considerable price difference between the two if you take their realistic US selling price. Not to turn this into a marketing thing but can anyone say 2 for the price of 1 with some change left over too lol.
Looking at the charts I think that a bit of the drop off especially on the tail end at higher RPM's with our engine is due to the use of a steel bearing versus ceramic. Switching to a ceramic bearing in the B6 should provide a noticeable reduction in friction which will probably increase the overall max HP and Torque numbers further as well as increase/extend them on the back and of the curve. It's also interesting to see that the graph with the 2057 pipe set is almost a perfect parabolic arch! It's nearly perfectly smooth which I think is what greatly contributes to the engine being so drivable, smooth and the very linear feel that the B6 gives. Again interesting information and thank you for posting this for all of us to see. Ron I wont lie to you Ron...when I tested the B6 I was shocked to see its numbers on the 2013... I even went back and retested a few other engines just to make sure something wasn't fishy with the dyno...Thats why it took me a while to post the results.... So far the B6 2013 with shim removed has the posted the highest torque numbers of any stock .21 I have tested to date..including the B5 which really shocked me.....I tested that B6 many times and its consistently pulling those numbers........ Just wait till you guys see the dyno of the mod B6 !!! |
Originally Posted by Maximo
(Post 8254403)
Just wait till you guys see the dyno of the mod B6 !!!
LMFAO:lol: |
| All times are GMT -7. It is currently 01:32 AM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.