![]() |
Originally Posted by THE PHILLY JYNX
(Post 8273811)
Does this nifty little function block you from seeings others post or just from them sending you PM'S?
http://www.rctech.net/forum/profile.php?do=ignorelist |
So what I can't ask a simple question? 15min run times with a big block 5 port engine that has been cut sounds a little suspect to me. I don't care who made or modded the engine. I'm not tryin to stir anything up. The comments made afterwards is what does it. I'm called stupid because I know better. Any one with basic knowledge of a combustable engine knows you can't have power, speed and great fuel milage. You have to give up one for the other. Come on a 3 port stock .12 don't get that kind of run time. A statement like this is supposed to go unquestioned. I just asked for proof. Since you got hit with a complaint about my question then I got my answer. Thanks.
|
Originally Posted by Jaz240
(Post 8273934)
what a wonderful feature! Now it just says you cannot see this post because you have ignored them! It also changed the user names to ass pimple
Oh and James. That made my day. :lol::lol::lol::lol: |
Originally Posted by ALLSPEED
(Post 8273970)
So what I can't ask a simple question? 15min run times with a big block 5 port engine that has been cut sounds a little suspect to me. I don't care who made or modded the engine. I'm not tryin to stir anything up. The comments made afterwards is what does it. I'm called stupid because I know better. Any one with basic knowledge of a combustable engine knows you can't have power, speed and great fuel milage. You have to give up one for the other. Come on a 3 port stock .12 don't get that kind of run time. A statement like this is supposed to go unquestioned. I just asked for proof. Since you got hit with a complaint about my question then I got my answer. Thanks.
yes you can make more power and use less fuel... We are running loop scavenging 2 strokes..they operate well below 100% efficiency due to the fact they have a tremendous amount of blowthru of the unburnt intake charge out the exhaust..... By altering the intake ports I can manipulate the loop pattern of the engine and have less blowthru of the intake charge...Which means I can burn a little more fuel that normally would be wasted....When I can burn more fuel, I can make more power.... Another area of improvement is in the head button.....by manipulating the button I can increase the density of of the charge in the combustion chamber (bowl) ..which result in a more complete burn of the mixture, which results in more power from fuel that would have been wasted..... |
Originally Posted by THE PHILLY JYNX
(Post 8273859)
Maybe someone should direct them to the H.E.S Thread:lol:
|
Originally Posted by houston
(Post 8274238)
nope , i'm doin just fine ;):D
|
Originally Posted by Maximo
(Post 8274245)
we're having a 2 for 1 special on them right now ! :p
cant we all just get along ;):batman: |
Originally Posted by Maximo
(Post 8274226)
you do bring up some valid points in what you say sometimes... How you two go about things you say is where the problems start...
yes you can make more power and use less fuel... We are running loop scavenging 2 strokes..they operate well below 100% efficiency due to the fact they have a tremendous amount of blowthru of the unburnt intake charge out the exhaust..... By altering the intake ports I can manipulate the loop pattern of the engine and have less blowthru of the intake charge...Which means I can burn a little more fuel that normally would be wasted....When I can burn more fuel, I can make more power.... Another area of improvement is in the head button.....by manipulating the button I can increase the density of of the charge in the combustion chamber (bowl) ..which result in a more complete burn of the mixture, which results in more power from fuel that would have been wasted..... |
Originally Posted by Jaz240
(Post 8273934)
what a wonderful feature! Now it just says you cannot see this post because you have ignored them! It also changed the user names to ass pimple
|
Originally Posted by Frank L
(Post 8274369)
Hey James do you have that top secret OS fuel yet? You know the $80/ gallon stuff??
|
Originally Posted by Jaz240
(Post 8274611)
Great now everyone knows. I'll have to make it $100 a gallon now. the good news is that people will only have to buy 3 gallons of it....:eek:
|
Originally Posted by JAMMINKRAZY
(Post 8274748)
Yeah due to the fact that OS engines with OS fuel will run for 4 hours on a tank.:eek:...........:lol::lol::p
|
Neal thanks for the PM that was priceless..
|
Originally Posted by ScottyM
(Post 8276030)
Neal thanks for the PM that was priceless..
|
Originally Posted by ALLSPEED
(Post 8273682)
Oh ya, my B5 does get 15+ min runtime.:sneaky:
I have seen this engine run a 3 min. warmup and 10 min. race with no pit and about a 1/4 tank left. |
| All times are GMT -7. It is currently 07:33 PM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.