R/C Tech Forums

R/C Tech Forums (https://www.rctech.net/forum/)
-   Nitro On-Road (https://www.rctech.net/forum/nitro-road-3/)
-   -   European 2wd 1/8th pan car on-road Classic class (https://www.rctech.net/forum/nitro-road/339398-european-2wd-1-8th-pan-car-road-classic-class.html)

JLock 10-29-2009 11:01 AM


Originally Posted by T-BODZ Terry B. (Post 6537358)
WOW! You just brought back some not so fond flashbacks of my 2WD Thorp and RC300BD Pan Cars with
Greenwood Corvette, Lancia Stratos or Ligier-Matra GT Bodies! A huge difference in handling from the
Lola & Elfin CanAm bodies at the time. I remember 1 season in the very early 80's that they had a GT race
out at the Ranch Pit Stop in Pomona, CA & Outlaw RC in San Bernardino, CA every month. What a struggle!

Sorry man, I did not know that it was bad with TC bodies on 1/8th scales back in the day. I know that 235mm 2wd cars handled pretty well with TC bodies. But with today's technology, wouldn't it be different now that the cars are designed and built better? Again, I am just throwing an idea out there to see what the interest is.

1/8 oldschool 10-29-2009 11:09 AM


Originally Posted by T-BODZ Terry B. (Post 6537358)
WOW! You just brought back some not so fond flashbacks of my 2WD Thorp and RC300BD Pan Cars with
Greenwood Corvette, Lancia Stratos or Ligier-Matra GT Bodies! A huge difference in handling from the
Lola & Elfin CanAm bodies at the time. I remember 1 season in the very early 80's that they had a GT race
out at the Ranch Pit Stop in Pomona, CA & Outlaw RC in San Bernardino, CA every month. What a struggle!

I too remember the days of GT bodies on my MARKER MACHINE and DELTA Super J ( still own both and they still run ) and I would have to agree they weren't great fun , but my god they looked COOL !

T-BODZ Terry B. 10-29-2009 11:36 AM


Originally Posted by 1/8 oldschool (Post 6537446)
I too remember the days of GT bodies on my MARKER MACHINE and DELTA Super J ( still own both and they still run ) and I would have to agree they weren't great fun , but my god they looked COOL !

I actually have a ton of old vintage 1/8 cars left over. My Father sent me several
large boxes of stuff from California 4 years ago. It was all sitting in our storage
unit. Off the top of my head I still have the following cars:

1 RC200 Built / Run
1 RC250 Built / Run
2 RC300 Ball Diff Cars Built / Brand New Never Run with New K&B's each.
3 RC500 2WD Built / Run
2 RC500 2WD Built / Brand New Never Run
1 RC500 2WD Unbuilt / New in Box
The rest are RC500 4WD, 4WD Conversion Kits and a Ton Of Parts, Pipes, Carbs, etc...

I'll take a few snap shots later and post'em. I even have 1 with a Greenwood
body and another with a Nissan GTP. I love the old vintage stuff .. cool to look
at and appreciate how much the hobby has evolved.

Take care!

Terry

djmachinist 10-29-2009 01:27 PM


Originally Posted by T-BODZ Terry B. (Post 6537545)
I actually have a ton of old vintage 1/8 cars left over. My Father sent me several
large boxes of stuff from California 4 years ago. It was all sitting in our storage
unit. Off the top of my head I still have the following cars:

1 RC200 Built / Run
1 RC250 Built / Run
2 RC300 Ball Diff Cars Built / Brand New Never Run with New K&B's each.
3 RC500 2WD Built / Run
2 RC500 2WD Built / Brand New Never Run
1 RC500 2WD Unbuilt / New in Box
The rest are RC500 4WD, 4WD Conversion Kits and a Ton Of Parts, Pipes, Carbs, etc...

I'll take a few snap shots later and post'em. I even have 1 with a Greenwood
body and another with a Nissan GTP. I love the old vintage stuff .. cool to look
at and appreciate how much the hobby has evolved.

Take care!

Terry

Terry,

This is not "YOUR FATHER'S OLDSMOBILE" eh......Associated RC-300! These are much better than the old Pan cars. I also still have some of my pan car stuff from "In the day". I have a new in-box Delta Super J. I did run an occasional Greenwood Vette GT body, also Kansas City used to have an annual fall Indy/Formula I body race on the old pan cars which was great fun,
but we never ran a sedan body! The GT cars handled bad enough when compared to a can-am body.

See you at the Gulf Coast Grand Prix,

Dale




















See you at the Gulf Coast Grandprix,

J.Gonzalez 10-29-2009 01:32 PM

I think it would be mistake to run them without lola style bodies.

It is the same problem igt cars have..handle like box of rocks.

Why install bodies that will make the car hadle worse? Especially for a newbie and again they look like cars in open class. Same reason they never run gt bodies on 1/12...they dont work and 2wd pancar is just a giant nitro 1/12.

wingracer 10-29-2009 01:36 PM


Originally Posted by motojon (Post 6537131)
Im guessing though here in the US if i can just add a $50 part and run it on my original chassis great...... If the class doesnt take off then im out $50 with a small paper weight. If I spend $400+ and the class doesnt take off then i got a slightly bigger more expensive paper weight. Also simple goes only so far eventually we want more of this or more of that to get them to handle here in the US. Alot of our tracks arent smooth like oversees so a full suspension 2wd might be the only thing that will work here for example the old Vector....i believe $500 for 2wd $550 for 4wd if you got tired of one you could run the other and keep all the same stuff and use the left overs off of the 4wd people

I understand what you are saying but from my point of view, why would I run this class at all? The only advantage would be cheaper motors. Everything else is basically the same so I will run 4wd with cheap motors. Again, for me the appeal of this class is lower maintenance. If I am going to have to rebuild shocks, suspension, belts, clutches and what not every race anyway, I'll run the faster car.

J.Gonzalez 10-29-2009 01:38 PM

Secondly getting any type of rear ball diff mass produced of retro fitted is going to be a ton of work.

No one really makes a 1/8 onroad ball/gear diff. You would have to retro fit one from a 200mm or offroad car...not fun unless you have a milling machine in your garage..and at that point you could build a simple complete 2wd conversion for say a mrx4x with fiberglass chassis.

JLock 10-29-2009 02:19 PM


Originally Posted by senna555 (Post 6537951)
I think it would be mistake to run them without lola style bodies.

It is the same problem igt cars have..handle like box of rocks.

Why install bodies that will make the car hadle worse? Especially for a newbie and again they look like cars in open class. Same reason they never run gt bodies on 1/12...they dont work and 2wd pancar is just a giant nitro 1/12.

I am sorry, but I race the IGT car and I have to stand up for it a little. Those cars do not handle as bad as you guys are saying. If you don't believe me, ask T-Bodz about how mine looked when I ran it at the first SWCS race back in Feb/Mar 2009. Ask the guys in Memphis at MSRA and the guys that use to run in Mississippi at the Bass Pro Shop series about how my car handled their tracks. Those cars are like any other: you find a good setup for the situation/track and conditions at hand. Though a lot slower than my MTX4, my IGT-1 handles like my MTX4 on a bigger scale. And the same holds true as far as body choices. I found out what bodies work well with my setup. Unfortunately, one of the bodies has been discontinued so I am holding on to the two (one new and one beat up) for as long as I can.

Like I said, it is just an idea guys but first, you have to let go of "how it use to be". These newer cars are designed better and probably handle better that their predecessors. Also, lexan bodies are designed and molded better than they were "back in the day". It is like this: many of you drive Hondas and Toyotas now. Well, back in the late 60s and early 70s when they were introduced to the US markets, they were little tin pieces (if you remember back that far). Well, they are not that way now due to progress. Using your lines of thinking about 1/8th scale touring, then the Hondas and Toyotas of today are still the like the little tin pieces from the 60s/70s that aren't worth owning or driving right? At some point, they improved and were worthy of consideration for purchase/ownership right?

J.Gonzalez 10-29-2009 02:36 PM

I dont think my point on the igt was clear.

I am sure with tinkering anything will work...the appeal of the class would be simplicity.

The pancars are pretty simple and not alot of adjustment. This would be a better start for a newbie or budget racers.

Same thing goes for the body....by running lola style body you already have max grip and steering. Much easier for a newbie/budget racer as you dont have to try to create grip thru other adjustments.

I ran gt car for a friend to break it in and attempt to improve handling...it ran the same with and without the body. I dont think the body has much of an effect on handling...that is not the case with a lola style body on a pancar electric or nitro...big difference in rear grip and balance.

On an unprep surface parking lot temp track I am sure they are a blast and great fun..however on a super clean,smooth,treated surface novelty tends to wear off quickly. I think this is why the class has not really caught on at the two permanent onroad tracks in northeast.

Jspeed 10-29-2009 02:40 PM


Originally Posted by senna555 (Post 6537951)
I think it would be mistake to run them without lola style bodies.

It is the same problem igt cars have..handle like box of rocks.

Why install bodies that will make the car hadle worse? Especially for a newbie and again they look like cars in open class. Same reason they never run gt bodies on 1/12...they dont work and 2wd pancar is just a giant nitro 1/12.

Don’t mean to hi-jack ya’ll tread, I do like the ideas of the 1/8 pan cars too, OK, but this needs to be said…………..!

senna dude, in the past I’ve read you bad talking GT cars, racers & racing in general on these threads.

Since you are someone that represents your track facility in Conn, maybe you should be more careful about your chosen words regarding GT class cars if you ever want to see your track enjoy on the growth of the class. You know that I sent you a “PM” on this before, remember………..

Here are a few reasons from racers from different countries that should help you should re-think how you talk about GT cars in the future:

Ipanema Sports 2010 GT World Championships at Homestead Miami Speedway Florida

It's almost a sold-out show, all GT2 Spec class pre-entry spots are filled and the race isn’t until next March!

GT1 Open Class

1. Juan Tejero GT1 Open Peru
2. Michael Haley GT1 Open USA
3. Deshun Dash GT1 Open USA
4. Todd Satkunas GT1 Open USA
5. Jose Baquero GT1 Open Venezuela
6. Salvatore Sortino GT1 Open Venezuela
7. Paul Roberts GT1 Open USA
8. Jeff Vargas GT1 Open USA
9. Partricio Concha GT1 Open Chile
10. Tim Phanidasak GT1 Open USA
11. Romulo Arcia GT1 Open Venezuela
12. Steve Miles GT1 Open USA
13. Jeff Green GT1 Open USA
14. Juan Luis Larrabure GT1 Open Peru
15. Miguel Daumont GT1 Open Puerto Rico
16. Eduardo Aparo Rizzi GT1 Open Venezuela
17. Tori Santiago GT1 Open Puerto Rico
18. Tommy Bond GT1 Open USA
19. Gus Wood GT1 Open USA
20. Luis Pineda GT1 Open Mexico
21. Ronnie Setser GT1 Open USA
22. Mark Borchert GT1 Open USA
23. Luis Ramos GT1 Open Puerto Rico
24. Andy Liu GT1 Open USA
25. Augusto Buchholtz GT1 Open Chile
26. Pablo Riveros GT1 Open Chile
27. Reinaldo Gil GT1 Open Chile
28. Rodrigo Cartergianni GT1 Open Chile
29. Jaime E. Negron GT1 Open Puerto Rico
30. Fernando Requejo GT1 Open Venezuela
31. Diron West GT1 Open USA
32. Eggie Betancourt GT1 Open Puerto Rico
33. Demonte Thornton GT1 Open USA
34. Joerg Schaedler GT1 Open Mexico
35. Todd Marshall GT1 Open USA
36. Edwin Ortiz GT1 Open Puerto Rico

Only 14 spots left in GT1 Open


GT2 Spec Class

1. Carl Edwards GT2 Spec USA
2. Juan Tejero GT2 Spec Peru
3. Juan Luis Larrabure GT2 Spec Peru
4. Todd Satkunas GT2 Spec USA
5. Marcus Vinicius da Silva GT2 Spec Brazil
6. Rich Esposito GT2 Spec USA
7. Juan Blaylock GT2 Spec USA
8. Fritz Adolph GT2 Spec USA
9. Mike Lyday GT2 Spec USA
10. Bernie Hoogstra GT2 Spec USA
11. David Mathews GT2 Spec USA
12. Juan Aramburo GT2 Spec Mexico
13. Juan Aramburo Jr. GT2 Spec Mexico
14. Josue Escamilla GT2 Spec Mexico
15. Erick Garcia GT2 Spec Mexico
16. David Ortiz GT2 Spec Mexico
17. Paul Roberts GT2 Spec USA
18. Tim Phanidasak GT2 Spec USA
19. Cuauhtemoc Medal Medellin GT2 Spec Mexico
20. Omar Horta GT2 Spec Mexico
21. Miguel Lopez Alcala GT2 Spec Mexico
22, Joerg Schaedler GT2 Spec Mexico
23. Kyle Green GT2 Spec USA
24. Eduardo Martinez GT2 Spec Mexico
25. Alferatt Vidal Repetto GT2 Spec Peru
26. Victor Babani GT2 Spec Mexico
27. Hector Suarez GT2 Spec Mexico
28. Charro Rivas GT2 Spec Mexico
29. Partricio Concha GT2 Spec Chile
30. Raul Rivera GT2 Spec Mexico
31. Rafael Chapa GT2 Spec Mexico
32. Antonio Lorca GT2 Spec Mexico
33. Gerardo Sanchez GT2 Spec Mexico
34. Luis Pineda GT2 Spec Mexico
35. Gus Wood GT2 Spec USA
36. Ronnie Setser GT2 Spec USA
37. Steve Nguyen GT2 Spec USA
38. Gary Strainer GT2 Spec USA
39. Abel Elizondo GT2 Spec Mexico
40. Guillermo Cadena GT2 Spec Mexico
41. Jeff Green GT2 Spec USA
42. Michael Frazier GT2 Spec USA
43. Diego Belmonte GT2 Spec Mexico
44. Juan Guillermo Garcia Pantoja GT2 Spec Mexico
45. Jose Luis Garcia Dominguez GT2 Spec Mexico
46. Sandro Diez GT2 Spec Peru
47. Todd Marshall GT2 Spec USA
48. Todd Forcione GT2 Spec USA
49. Steven Jackson GT2 Spec USA
50. Erick Nunez GT2 Spec Mexico

GT2 Spec is sold-out, all 50 pre-entry spots are filled!
We will be accepting GT2 waiting list entries for any openings or racer cancellations

A total of 86 GT race cars registered make a great group picture for R/C Car magazine!

.... is it March yet!!!

www.gtworldchampionships.com

I now return you to your great 1/8 pan car thread:)

JLock 10-29-2009 02:54 PM


Originally Posted by senna555 (Post 6538158)
I dont think my point on the igt was clear.

I am sure with tinkering anything will work...the appeal of the class would be simplicity.

The pancars are pretty simple and not alot of adjustment. This would be a better start for a newbie or budget racers.

Same thing goes for the body....by running lola style body you already have max grip and steering. Much easier for a newbie/budget racer as you dont have to try to create grip thru other adjustments.

I ran gt car for a friend to break it in and attempt to improve handling...it ran the same with and without the body. I dont think the body has much of an effect on handling...that is not the case with a lola style body on a pancar electric or nitro...big difference in rear grip and balance.

On an unprep surface parking lot temp track I am sure they are a blast and great fun..however on a super clean,smooth,treated surface novelty tends to wear off quickly. I think this is why the class has not really caught on at the two permanent onroad tracks in northeast.

Sorry, I have to disagree with your last two paragraphs. The setup that I have with the tires I use (Ipanema), my car handles just the same whether it is an unprepped parking lot track or a smooth, prepped permanent track (RCRCNT). And, just like TC or 1/8th scale lolas, the bodies do affect the handling of the cars as well as the setup. The IGT cars aren't catching on because like any new class, without support from some of the established racers in an area, it never will catch on.

Now, back to the topic, why not think outside the box a little? Why not have a little variety instead of "being like the established class"? If you want to run a lola body, you already have 4wd. Like I said, it is just an idea for consideration, not something that "has to be done". Dude, I like the idea of having a 2wd class of 1/8th scales, I would just like it to be a bit different from the established class (4wd).

J.Gonzalez 10-29-2009 03:05 PM

No one really runs this class in the area.

Your opinion in noted but I dont agree...and honestly dont really care.

If you have a thousand people that show up at your race that is great. Very few people run this class in the area.

I am sure you have a thriving group of racers that really enjoy this class...that is great it. Enjoy it keep it going. It has not caught on in area and I have no interest in trying to help build this class as I dont think it is a good solution for getting new racers to the track. It needs to be something similar to a traxxas slash extremely simple..cheap...slow....but resembles other racing cars at an event.

My idea behind the thread is to get new people at the track...to buy a ready to run, modify the heck out of it, put a big horsepower engine and your back to cost of a 200mm or 1/8 and it becomes really complex and guess what...no new racers.

Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please with all due respect get over it and move on I am sure your time is better spent in other areas.

wingracer 10-29-2009 03:06 PM

I have never raced an IGT car but I did drive one and it drove very well. Not as responsive as I would like but very easy to drive for a noob and I'm sure a stiffer set-up would get the responsiveness I would want. I have also seen some that looked like a nightmare to drive. Just like anything else, it's all in the set-up.

Jspeed 10-29-2009 03:10 PM


Originally Posted by senna555 (Post 6538267)
No one really runs this class in the area.

Your opinion in noted but I dont agree...and honestly dont really care.

If you have a thousand people that show up at your race that is great. Very few people run this class in the area.

I am sure you have a thriving group of racers that really enjoy this class...that is great it. Enjoy it keep it going. It has not caught on in area and I have no interest in trying to help build this class as I dont think it is a good solution for getting new racers to the track. It needs to be something similar to a traxxas slash extremely simple..cheap...slow.

My idea behind the thread is to get new people at the track...to buy a ready to run, modify the heck out of it, put a big horsepower engine and your back to cost of a 200mm or 1/8 and it becomes really complex and guess what...no new racers.

Please Please Please Please Please Please Please Please with all due respect get over it and move on I am sure your time is better spent in other areas.

I'm more than over you poor & non-supportive attitude towards GT class cars and racers.

But know this.....
You have just told all GT racers from around the world that your track doesn't care about them and our class.

Thanks for your wishes of good luck, but luck doesn'e have anything to do with the growth your track will not experence until you learn to keep you negative thoughts to yourself.:lol:

J.Gonzalez 10-29-2009 03:13 PM

Yawn.

garen 10-29-2009 03:16 PM

Another thing to note on the keeping it simple angle is that the 2wd pan cars, to the best of my knowledge, all use a single speed tranny, and off road type clutch systems, which are much easier to adjust and maintain.

As far as the GT discussion goes, the cars can work quite well or quite poorly, depending on tires, setup, and quality of assembly. I have seen both ends of the spectrum. I think this thread is on the right track with the 2wd pan car discussion, perhaps the GT discussion should relocate to a GT thread.

wingracer 10-29-2009 03:19 PM

I will say this much. I do think GT is ultimately doomed. Not right now. Right now it seems like a great class. It will be doomed the day someone like Serpent or Mugen decides to build a full blown race car just for the class instead of a revamped buggy. Then it will be just as expensive, demanding and difficult as 1/8th so why bother.

Jspeed 10-29-2009 03:23 PM


Originally Posted by garen (Post 6538310)
As far as the GT discussion goes, the cars can work quite well or quite poorly, depending on tires, setup, and quality of assembly. I have seen both ends of the spectrum. I think this thread is on the right track with the 2wd pan car discussion, perhaps the GT discussion should relocate to a GT thread.

No problem Garren

Just so we all understand that whenever senna or anyone tries to bad talk GT they understand I will be there to set them straight on any thread.

yo senna, yawn all you want, when the GT race is 100+ strong, remember what your track's turn-outs have been all year long.:lol::lol:

motojon 10-29-2009 03:30 PM

Personally im SOOOOOOOOO down for a 2wd class, but i do like the adjustability of 4wd, for me its fun to try set-ups and expirement, agrevating at times yes but still fun, cheap or inexpesive will only last as long as you stop wanting to go faster

*1speedy 10-29-2009 03:33 PM


Originally Posted by senna555 (Post 6538158)
I dont think my point on the igt was clear.

I am sure with tinkering anything will work...the appeal of the class would be simplicity.

The pancars are pretty simple and not alot of adjustment. This would be a better start for a newbie or budget racers.

Same thing goes for the body....by running lola style body you already have max grip and steering. Much easier for a newbie/budget racer as you dont have to try to create grip thru other adjustments.

I ran gt car for a friend to break it in and attempt to improve handling...it ran the same with and without the body. I dont think the body has much of an effect on handling...that is not the case with a lola style body on a pancar electric or nitro...big difference in rear grip and balance.

On an unprep surface parking lot temp track I am sure they are a blast and great fun..however on a super clean,smooth,treated surface novelty tends to wear off quickly. I think this is why the class has not really caught on at the two permanent onroad tracks in northeast.

I have been reading these threads for about a year or so and really never say anything but seems that it’s time to speak up. By you being a so called tech master it sure seems you are a VERY LARGE hater of the GT class why is this? If you don’t like a class why not keep your trap shut there are many that enjoy this class and it is growing more and more every season & if you still feel this class is not growing why did the Ipanema GT World Championship race in Miami almost completely sell out in 3 weeks? (100 racers). If your so called chassis tuning skills can’t see the difference in driving with a body and without one I would say your deaf dumb and blind so put the crack pipe down and get some help because that has to be one of the dumbest things you have written yet. We race weekly on a clean smooth treated surface and love it more and more every week. As to not catching on at these so called permanent tracks in the northeast would one of them be yours and if so how can you blame it for not catching on if all you do is give your biased opinion. Tech Master my azz more like Tech Idiot

*1speedy 10-29-2009 03:36 PM


Originally Posted by senna555 (Post 6538299)
Yawn.

My bad this is the guy everyone has been talking about that wears that stupid yellow helmet while on the drivers stand now I understand.:nod:

J.Gonzalez 10-29-2009 03:45 PM

3 Attachment(s)

Originally Posted by wingracer (Post 6538317)
I will say this much. I do think GT is ultimately doomed. Not right now. Right now it seems like a great class. It will be doomed the day someone like Serpent or Mugen decides to build a full blown race car just for the class instead of a revamped buggy. Then it will be just as expensive, demanding and difficult as 1/8th so why bother.

Too late to....already being done overseas...it is an 1/8 car with sedan tires.

Boy that sure is a nice track:D

wingracer 10-29-2009 03:47 PM

Looks like a rally car. How long before someone imports one to the states for GT use?

J.Gonzalez 10-29-2009 03:51 PM

I should try the yellow helmet..works for hamilton and senna...maybe it will work for rc...real question is what color visor..i am thinking amber!

Cheers and especially to the gt racers enjoy your race and good luck.

Jamie Gonzalez

wingracer 10-29-2009 03:55 PM

Amber for low light/night.

Grey or bronze tint for bright sun light.

:D

J.Gonzalez 10-29-2009 03:56 PM

word!

*1speedy 10-29-2009 04:01 PM


Originally Posted by wingracer (Post 6538317)
I will say this much. I do think GT is ultimately doomed. Not right now. Right now it seems like a great class. It will be doomed the day someone like Serpent or Mugen decides to build a full blown race car just for the class instead of a revamped buggy. Then it will be just as expensive, demanding and difficult as 1/8th so why bother.

Our hope is this class will evolve like all the others that are there now. As to this class getting as demanding & difficult or as expensive as the 1/8th classes that you are suggesting I would cautiously say this was never the direction that this class had chosen however these so mentioned buggy characteristics are the exact ones that make this class so enjoyable for us that so passionately enjoy it. Fair to say if those other companies that you mentioned were involved I could easily see the expense going through the roof but I agree with you to say it will not happen any time soon.

Serpent-Dan 10-29-2009 04:04 PM

smh yall too much!

*1speedy 10-29-2009 04:11 PM


Originally Posted by senna555 (Post 6538402)
Too late to....already being done overseas...it is an 1/8 car with sedan tires.

Boy that sure is a nice track:D

LMAO you did a frantic google search for these cars after you shot your mouth off they have been out for at least 2 years now. These cars are not part of the GT class maybe you should of took a extra min with your visor up. Guess you had your helmet on again :eek:

wingracer 10-29-2009 04:22 PM

Exactly speedy. This is how any new class goes. It's great in the beginning because the cars are cheap and simple, you don't need big HP because the handling and driving isn't quite world class yet and noobs can be competitive because everyone is a noob. But as soon as the class gets enough participation to attract the big dog manufacturers, you will see them make cars for the class and have drivers like Swauger, Burch an Paolo to deal with. Not quite as much fun for the noob anymore. Just look at 1/10th TC. Used to be noobs running HPI's all blinged out and having a blast, now it's all about worlds level competition and most of those HPI guys are gone or running Slashes instead.

So what does this mean for 2wd pan cars? Well, 1/12th scale has been around from the start and shows no sign of dying. Why? Cheap, simple, low maintenance racing fun with stable rules that don't allow any more technical complexity to creep in. Ten year old cars are still capable of winning major races. GT has all that except for the prohibitions on further tech. So I see 2wd pan cars as a potentially better option for an easy entry level nitro class. Right now GT may be just as good and appealing for that purpose but that will most likely change eventually.

wingracer 10-29-2009 04:23 PM


Originally Posted by *1speedy (Post 6538510)
LMAO you did a frantic google search for these cars after you shot your mouth off they have been out for at least 2 years now. These cars are not part of the GT class

Is that because they are illegal or just because no one has showed up with one yet?

J.Gonzalez 10-29-2009 04:28 PM

Search Rally Game been out for years overseas and surprisingly not that popular...go figure...however redrc has some neat info.

http://www.redrc.net/2008/12/bmt-081...is/#more-12959


Same thing happened in offroad...whatever happened to that monster truck class...oh yeah it is called truggy...full out 1/8 car with bigger tires and more aero body.

Amber visor is the way to go.

J.Gonzalez 10-29-2009 04:32 PM


Originally Posted by wingracer (Post 6538553)
Exactly speedy. This is how any new class goes. It's great in the beginning because the cars are cheap and simple, you don't need big HP because the handling and driving isn't quite world class yet and noobs can be competitive because everyone is a noob. But as soon as the class gets enough participation to attract the big dog manufacturers, you will see them make cars for the class and have drivers like Swauger, Burch an Paolo to deal with. Not quite as much fun for the noob anymore. Just look at 1/10th TC. Used to be noobs running HPI's all blinged out and having a blast, now it's all about worlds level competition and most of those HPI guys are gone or running Slashes instead.

So what does this mean for 2wd pan cars? Well, 1/12th scale has been around from the start and shows no sign of dying. Why? Cheap, simple, low maintenance racing fun with stable rules that don't allow any more technical complexity to creep in. Ten year old cars are still capable of winning major races. GT has all that except for the prohibitions on further tech. So I see 2wd pan cars as a potentially better option for an easy entry level nitro class. Right now GT may be just as good and appealing for that purpose but that will most likely change eventually.

Yup and the bird is the word.

Jspeed 10-29-2009 04:35 PM

Actually…. Belt-Drive “Rally-Game” type cars have been around for a while, not new to us GT racers at all.

They’re very cool cars that deserve their own category. More like a single speed 1/8 scale with big rubber tires, as GT racing grows they’ll be another class in “shaft drive” GT “rubber tire racing events.

What ever "Rally-Game" racers have done & do, has nothing the do with North American style GT racing.

"Pro" drivers have to race with the same stuff as us "newbies" do, maybe we'll see how good they really are too.

But............ we should really move this to the GT thread if you want to learn more about GT racing, for respect for the 1/8 Pan-Car racers.

If the Pan-Car" class does grow, I might want to race in it too and if by chance it wishes to try racing with rubber tires; Ipanema might help support it too.:nod::tire::)

*1speedy 10-29-2009 04:47 PM


Originally Posted by wingracer (Post 6538553)
Exactly speedy. This is how any new class goes. It's great in the beginning because the cars are cheap and simple, you don't need big HP because the handling and driving isn't quite world class yet and noobs can be competitive because everyone is a noob. But as soon as the class gets enough participation to attract the big dog manufacturers, you will see them make cars for the class and have drivers like Swauger, Burch an Paolo to deal with. Not quite as much fun for the noob anymore. Just look at 1/10th TC. Used to be noobs running HPI's all blinged out and having a blast, now it's all about worlds level competition.

So what does this mean for 2wd pan cars? Well, 1/12th scale has been around from the start and shows no sign of dying. Why? Cheap, simple, low maintenance racing fun with stable rules that don't allow any more technical complexity to creep in. Ten year old cars are still capable of winning major races. GT has all that except for the prohibitions on further tech. So I see 2wd pan cars as a potentially better option for an easy entry level nitro class. Right now GT may be just as good and appealing for that purpose but that will most likely change eventually.

Well we have yet to see what will happen to the GT class it has been growing for a few years now and shows no sign of dyeing except at tracks that tech master senna :ha: is affiliated with. As to this thread and its 1/12 scale pan cars I say COOL and the more the better as we should all say about any class if we run it or not especially if we expect this sport to grow during these hard times. As to the opinion of GT being entry level that’s a different discussion and I understand why that is often quoted but it’s really not as accurate as it sounds, your chosen words of entry level can make this GT class sound unattractive and when at the track the people I see that no nothing of the sport love the other faster cars but always and I mean always talk to the GT people the more because of its realistic look and size. I don’t see this class leaving any time soon but you is entitled to your opinion.

Jspeed 10-29-2009 04:54 PM


Originally Posted by senna555 (Post 6538584)
Search Rally Game been out for years overseas and surprisingly not that popular...go figure...however redrc has some neat info.

http://www.redrc.net/2008/12/bmt-081...is/#more-12959


Same thing happened in offroad...whatever happened to that monster truck class...oh yeah it is called truggy...full out 1/8 car with bigger tires and more aero body.

Amber visor is the way to go.

"And now you're trashing truggies? what an idiot":lol::lol::lol::lol::lol:

wingracer 10-29-2009 04:57 PM


Originally Posted by Jspeed (Post 6538615)

"Pro" drivers have to race with the same stuff as us "newbies" do, maybe we'll see how good they really are too.

Believe me, you will and they are. :D

Jspeed 10-29-2009 05:01 PM


Originally Posted by wingracer (Post 6538558)
Is that because they are illegal or just because no one has showed up with one yet?

All the GT racing in North America for the past 3 years has a common understanding that that belt-drive "Rally-Game" cars aren'e "shaft-drive" GT cars, Some parts of the world do allow them to race together, but not in North American GT style racing.

djmachinist 10-29-2009 05:03 PM


Originally Posted by wingracer (Post 6538553)
Exactly speedy. This is how any new class goes. It's great in the beginning because the cars are cheap and simple, you don't need big HP because the handling and driving isn't quite world class yet and noobs can be competitive because everyone is a noob. But as soon as the class gets enough participation to attract the big dog manufacturers, you will see them make cars for the class and have drivers like Swauger, Burch an Paolo to deal with. Not quite as much fun for the noob anymore. Just look at 1/10th TC. Used to be noobs running HPI's all blinged out and having a blast, now it's all about worlds level competition and most of those HPI guys are gone or running Slashes instead.

So what does this mean for 2wd pan cars? Well, 1/12th scale has been around from the start and shows no sign of dying. Why? Cheap, simple, low maintenance racing fun with stable rules that don't allow any more technical complexity to creep in. Ten year old cars are still capable of winning major races. GT has all that except for the prohibitions on further tech. So I see 2wd pan cars as a potentially better option for an easy entry level nitro class. Right now GT may be just as good and appealing for that purpose but that will most likely change eventually.

Yes, I agree about what happened with 1/10th TC and not to mention it killed the 235mm class. I eluded to this in my first post on this thread.

Speedy,
I appreciate what you are saying about the GT class, however look at the topic of this thread. It does'nt say anything about the GT class. This thread was started to discuss The "1/8th scale pan car class" . I sure did not say anything about the GT class. If the GT class is your passion and you have a successful program at your track, thats great, I wish you well. Senna 555 got his say and you got your say. enough is enough with the insults. Now, can we please get back to thread topic? If you would like to stick around and discuss the topic, you are welcome.

Dale:)

Jspeed 10-29-2009 05:05 PM


Originally Posted by wingracer (Post 6538707)
Believe me, you will and they are. :D

I think the stars of GT racing will be GT racers, any "Pros" that come into North American style GT class racing will have to drive what "we" drive too.:lol::)

Pan-Car guys....

senna opened his "pie-hole" trashing the GT cars and your thread went south.......

I wish you guys all the best with the new class, once you get it rolling, don't let anyone trash talk what your doing and it will grow well too.


All times are GMT -7. It is currently 02:02 PM.

Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.8
Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.