Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Nitro Off-Road
The End of Nitro???? >

The End of Nitro????

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

The End of Nitro????

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-19-2014, 07:53 PM
  #91  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Hoese37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hutchinson, MN
Posts: 3,819
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Also, compare physical size and weight of these gas motors. There's a ton of weight very high up.
Hoese37 is offline  
Old 04-19-2014, 08:04 PM
  #92  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
wmazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 164
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Spark ignition nitro engines!!!!!


Bill M.
wmazz is offline  
Old 04-19-2014, 10:16 PM
  #93  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
wmazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 164
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by BillyT.
The higher the octane, the less it smells, less clingy, too.
In 1/5 scale, the higher the octane, the greater the losses in horsepower.

With these 5cc gasoline engines, they will get twice the run time with the
same size fuel tank.

Trying to find a pit man for racing is a pain, perhaps it will eliminate the pit man.


Bill M.

Last edited by wmazz; 04-19-2014 at 11:14 PM.
wmazz is offline  
Old 04-19-2014, 10:25 PM
  #94  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
wmazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 164
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Rsickles
Yeah, that's a problem. Notice how quickly it hits top end. Buggy promo was on a really tight track.

30,000RPM vs 40,000RPM, that's a 25% drop-off in top end. Simply putting a large clutch bell on won't return that ratio, since most existing buggy/truggy
1/8th platforms can only take a couple teeth larger before the engine mount bottoms.
Nitro engines have an untapped potential for more HP, and there is no reason why a modified spark
ignition engine can't operate at the same rpm. But I do have a problem with promoting slow acceleration
after the peak. The power could be reasonable, but never better.

That said, change the carburetor, and you would have a nitro engine with more potential.

Originally Posted by mtpocketsracing
I've never heard of a gasoline engine using glow plugs.
One of the model airplane engine manufacture does. I believe it is OS,
use their oil for the premix and the glow plug works.

Bill M.

Last edited by wmazz; 04-19-2014 at 11:37 PM.
wmazz is offline  
Old 04-19-2014, 10:31 PM
  #95  
Tech Master
iTrader: (25)
 
megasaxon's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Lake City, PA
Posts: 1,724
Trader Rating: 25 (88%+)
Default

megasaxon is offline  
Old 04-19-2014, 10:49 PM
  #96  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (5)
 
Hoese37's Avatar
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Hutchinson, MN
Posts: 3,819
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by wmazz
There is no reason why a spark ignition engine can't turn 45,000rpm.


Bill M.
Yes there is. It's called a ringed piston.
Hoese37 is offline  
Old 04-19-2014, 11:14 PM
  #97  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
wmazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 164
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by mtpocketsracing
Theres no reason a nitro engine can't use gasoline right now. Compression might need modified and a spark plug installed
but it's just a two stroke engine like any 2 stroke.
Yes that's right, but there are reasons for why a RC Gasoline engine should be manufactured differently.
If they did, the engines would make much more power, and close the gap on nitro.

That said, gasoline is never, ever going to replace nitro class buggies. But they will make an excellent
entry class machine. It would be good PR if they found a good driver, proper changes to the engine, and
gear train, someone could make a strong case for gasoline engines.


Originally Posted by mtpocketsracing
And there's no reason a larger gasoline engine can't use nitro. They burn nitromethane in gas engines in drag racing.
Except without the oil and 100% nitro I believe.
They already do. I used to build and sell Goped pipes. I always set up my best racers with at least 5%. I also converted
GT80 Zenoahs and 180cc twins to run 25% nitro with mcCoy #9's and my own version of mechanical fuel injection.


Originally Posted by mtpocketsracing
But there might be a unseen problem with using gasoline. It has a hard time not pre-igniting under high rpm and heat.
That's why race gas for race engines is 100+ motor octane. Which you can't just go to the local gas station for.
I did some work on the 9cc NGH, I believe the ignition timing on this low rpm engine is near 45' btdc. With the smaller
engines, the flame front still travels at the same speed. The bore size is so small that it is difficult to preheat the air-fuel
mixture to the point of self ignition. But I am sure it can still be done!

I don't see high octane as being necessary for the same reason. Especially because it kills horsepower.

One of the other benefits of the NGH 9cc engine was the run time, it was twice that of nitro.

Last edited by wmazz; 04-19-2014 at 11:25 PM.
wmazz is offline  
Old 04-19-2014, 11:17 PM
  #98  
Tech Adept
iTrader: (1)
 
wmazz's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Riverside, CA
Posts: 164
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Hoese37
Yes there is. It's called a ringed piston.
I edited my post accordingly.

Last edited by wmazz; 04-19-2014 at 11:32 PM.
wmazz is offline  
Old 04-20-2014, 12:02 AM
  #99  
Tech Fanatic
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 855
Default

Originally Posted by token
BS - Im a nitro guy that is just building a 1/8 E as we speak. It cost the same as my nitro. Im sorry, but I not buying the cheapest stuff. To get what I feel is quality equipment, Im at more than the price of my nitro buggy. Batteries, Motor, ESC cost more than my Nitro engine, pipe and a case of fuel. And for the record, yes EP is I would say bigger than nitro right now, for ALOT of people it is not simpler. Ive seen people struggle with EP as they struggled with nitro.

Ive been in the hobby for a long time. Ive seen many classes started over the years due to new products, but regardless the standard classes remain to this day and will remain for years to come. Ntiro buggy is going nowhere. It may have gotten smaller, but popularity will increase. Its been the same cycle for years.
Thank you for the truth.........

Other thing they seem to like to compare 1/10 electric vs 1/8 nitro in cost.
pdmustgt is offline  
Old 04-21-2014, 05:56 AM
  #100  
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
 
BillyT.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,912
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by wmazz
In 1/5 scale, the higher the octane, the greater the losses in horsepower.
But you have the potential for more power with more octane.

Nitro is a power adder. Higher octane is not. It's actually less explosive than lower octane. So just filling up with 105 instead of 93 wont do anything for you, and like you said, will lose power. The higher the octane, the less prone to ignition it is, which is why we can advance timing, up the CR, increase boost, what ever it takes to up the cylinder pressure without the chance of pre ignition. But without doing that, sure, you are gonna lose power on any engine without knock detection/timing retard, if you just switch to race gas.

So like I said, pull the head shims, run 100, make more power.

More run time, sure... twice as long... maybe... maybe not.
BillyT. is offline  
Old 04-21-2014, 06:36 AM
  #101  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (15)
 
asc6000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Meridian Idaho
Posts: 3,412
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

I like it. Can't run nitro due to the noxious fumes. So if I have to have the noise I would consider a smaller gas motor. Fuel vs Electric ? sorry, they both have their place so no slagging here.
asc6000 is offline  
Old 04-21-2014, 07:35 AM
  #102  
Tech Master
iTrader: (15)
 
TheRcworld101's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Mayland
Posts: 1,043
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

First off I would like to say stupid post!!! Nitro is rulling right now and I'm pretty sure this will never go big and it's not "The future" Is more like dead!!!! Pointless post.
TheRcworld101 is offline  
Old 04-21-2014, 07:44 AM
  #103  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (6)
 
Coach Townsend's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 966
Trader Rating: 6 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by TheRcworld101
First off I would like to say stupid post!!! Nitro is rulling right now and I'm pretty sure this will never go big and it's not "The future" Is more like dead!!!! Pointless post.
+1
Coach Townsend is offline  
Old 04-21-2014, 07:47 AM
  #104  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (15)
 
asc6000's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Meridian Idaho
Posts: 3,412
Trader Rating: 15 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by TheRcworld101
First off I would like to say stupid post!!! Nitro is rulling right now and I'm pretty sure this will never go big and it's not "The future" Is more like dead!!!! Pointless post.
Looking at your other posts I would agree.
asc6000 is offline  
Old 04-21-2014, 08:26 AM
  #105  
Tech Master
iTrader: (4)
 
BillyT.'s Avatar
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Posts: 1,912
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Nitro is only ruling at the pro levels. Club races all over the country are dead. E buggy is taking over. Gas engine won't be the savior. E guys obviously aren't worried about cost with $200 ESCs and $180 motors and $100 batteries....

Nitro off-road is dying, and a gas engine isn't going to make it any better.
BillyT. is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.