the lounge

Tucker Carlson: “Every leader kills people, including my leader. Some kill more than others. Leadership requires killing people.”


Also Tucker Carlson: "If you find yourself arguing that it's a good thing to drop nuclear weapons on people, then you are evil."

there's a difference between strategic strikes to kill an enemy, and mass casualties as a vulgar display of power against an enemy. one is a necessity to maintain a certain degree of "fill in the blank" (usually some kind of safety) the other hinges on comic book villain territory.
not wanting to bomb an air field that kills enemy soldiers to prevent them from attacking but doing it anyway is one thing. nuking that air field and obliterating it and the surrounding civilian population causing mass casualties, not to mention the fallout from the weapon is something entirely different. not to mention the leader ok with dropping that nuke on the airfield would also be ok dropping it on the middle of New York City.

im not talking about past use of nukes, im talking about future use of nukes. we are all aware of circumstances of the lase use, but those circumstances don't currently exist in the world.
never said anything about nuking your own. was referencing that an enemy of the US ok with nuking a US base would also be ok nuking NYC. justify it by any means necessary. that's a special kind of mental.

Biden and his establishment can all go suck a donkey dick. Someone needs to find Corn Pop to finish this old, retarded, limp dick, pile of shit off. I’ve already started seeing Biden/Harris signs in people’s yards. If the people are outside when I drive by I honk the horn and give them the finger. If they’re not out, I still honk the horn and give them the finger. What the fuck is seriously wrong with these people?

it was tactical in WWll because Japan didn't have any. who are you going to nuke today that doesn't have the ability to fire back? today i think the first person to launch one is going to become the enemy of most developed nations (allies included). not to mention whoever you nuked would launch 10 more back at you in retaliation. ...or play the victim card so hard you will win the battle but not the war. it'll come with a stigma. unless you're crazy enough to hold the world hostage. and now your back into comic book villain territory mixed with a healthy dose of totalitarianism.

Actually, I would say that WW2 nukes are considered more strategic than tactical, at least based on their defining characteristics. Tactical weapons are intended for battlefield use, often near friendly forces, whereas strategic weapons are designed for use on targets far from the battlefield, typically in settled territory. An example of a tactical nuclear weapon is the Sprint missile, which is specifically designed to destroy other nukes and would be used in friendly territory.

We do have the option of using nuclear weapons against several smaller nuclear-capable nations like Iran and North Korea. We possess enough kill vehicles to eliminate their stockpiles if they were to retaliate. However, this doesn’t take into account the potential of other nations joining in the conflict.

But getting back to the original topic, what Tucker said was simply hypocritical and stupid.

i lost half of my brain watching this
​​​​​​https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MFroGPJJwSM