FSEARA 2009
07-16-2008, 03:52 PM
#316
he's coming this weekend
07-16-2008, 09:05 PM
#318
LMFAO
07-21-2008, 08:36 AM
#320
I have a serious issue with the participation point and the loss of the TQ point. We have drops for a reason, real life trumps RC racing no matter what is going on, sorry. If you go to a race and I don't you get more points then me automatically. No TQ point takes most of the tire strategy right out the window. How pissed would you be if had a family event and you lost a championship by a participation point? That is just wrong. Not to mention this wasn't voted on or even discussed as a group.
To my knowledge the change in points discussion we had was to change the spread further instead of the current single point spread. How did that turn into no TQ and participation?
Also, I'm getting tired of Tim saying don't talk to me, talk to Izzy. Tim, you know you are as or more involved with this crap then Izzy is, stop trying to hide behind him.
To my knowledge the change in points discussion we had was to change the spread further instead of the current single point spread. How did that turn into no TQ and participation?
Also, I'm getting tired of Tim saying don't talk to me, talk to Izzy. Tim, you know you are as or more involved with this crap then Izzy is, stop trying to hide behind him.
07-21-2008, 08:45 AM
#321
I have a serious issue with the participation point and the loss of the TQ point. We have drops for a reason, real life trumps RC racing no matter what is going on, sorry. If you go to a race and I don't you get more points then me automatically. No TQ point takes most of the tire strategy right out the window. How pissed would you be if had a family event and you lost a championship by a participation point? That is just wrong. Not to mention this wasn't voted on or even discussed as a group.
To my knowledge the change in points discussion we had was to change the spread further instead of the current single point spread. How did that turn into no TQ and participation?
Also, I'm getting tired of Tim saying don't talk to me, talk to Izzy. Tim, you know you are as or more involved with this crap then Izzy is, stop trying to hide behind him.
To my knowledge the change in points discussion we had was to change the spread further instead of the current single point spread. How did that turn into no TQ and participation?
Also, I'm getting tired of Tim saying don't talk to me, talk to Izzy. Tim, you know you are as or more involved with this crap then Izzy is, stop trying to hide behind him.
07-21-2008, 09:12 AM
#322
If you ask me, we need to get a new ballot made with clear explanations of the proposed rule changes and get it to everyone that qualifies to vote. Have a discussion about them and then vote. Oh wait, that's how we did it every year except this one.....
07-21-2008, 09:15 AM
#323
Tony, I am guessing you are not talking about me.. ( Tim). But Yeah we had discussions years past about participation points and it was voted down...
I really do not understsnd the lack of TQ point... fastest is fastest... should get somethign for that...
I really do not understsnd the lack of TQ point... fastest is fastest... should get somethign for that...
I have a serious issue with the participation point and the loss of the TQ point. We have drops for a reason, real life trumps RC racing no matter what is going on, sorry. If you go to a race and I don't you get more points then me automatically. No TQ point takes most of the tire strategy right out the window. How pissed would you be if had a family event and you lost a championship by a participation point? That is just wrong. Not to mention this wasn't voted on or even discussed as a group.
To my knowledge the change in points discussion we had was to change the spread further instead of the current single point spread. How did that turn into no TQ and participation?
Also, I'm getting tired of Tim saying don't talk to me, talk to Izzy. Tim, you know you are as or more involved with this crap then Izzy is, stop trying to hide behind him.
To my knowledge the change in points discussion we had was to change the spread further instead of the current single point spread. How did that turn into no TQ and participation?
Also, I'm getting tired of Tim saying don't talk to me, talk to Izzy. Tim, you know you are as or more involved with this crap then Izzy is, stop trying to hide behind him.
07-21-2008, 10:20 AM
#324
Having a new ballot would be a great idea but doubt that would happen...So why dont we just live with what was voted on (weight , stupid heads up, and what ever else was voted on) and take away the stuff that wasnt voted on! (TQ point, participation point, spec 17.5, I hope i didnt miss one)...I know Tim Kowel has asked this many time ans was never answered. How is the heads up grid going to work? I dont want to show up to the first race and nobody has any idea what to do for a grid.
Bryan
Bryan
07-21-2008, 10:26 AM
#325
That would be the logical thing to do, wouldn't it? I second that idea.
07-21-2008, 10:28 AM
#326
Hey Quick question?? Am i the president......... NO! I came on here and answered a questions that people had with answers directly from Izzy, NOT form Me. Everyone wants to jump down my ass about the rules because i spoke up for Izzy (my bad for answering peoples questions). I want nothing to do with the rules or the rule changes. My title is scorekeeper and to help Izzy with the RC Scoring Pro software and want to leave it at that. Your on the board Tony (Photographer) You have as much say as I do. If i remember correctly I said to do a re-vote at the Adrenaline race after everyone claimed they had no idea what they were voting on and was shot down. I too will not be able to make all of the races more than likely due to work so the participation point affects me too. YES it would suck to lose a championship because of those points i agree 100%. I DO agree with no TQ points..... it would keep the championship closer together till the end making the last few races more important. I also agree with you that we should do a re-vote and have already brought this up and was told no.
07-21-2008, 10:49 AM
#327
NO MORE HEADS UP AS RULE 15.6.1 SAYS!!!!!!!!
This rule explains that we will start in a group but each car having its own clock. This is great so it is ifmar just the anounser wont car go car 1 go car 2 and so on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!GLAD TO SEE THIS!!!!!!!!!
15.6.1 Qualifiers:
Each qualifying heat shall be run group start style. Each car will count separately and will be on its own clock unless an exception is noted in the class specification
This rule explains that we will start in a group but each car having its own clock. This is great so it is ifmar just the anounser wont car go car 1 go car 2 and so on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!GLAD TO SEE THIS!!!!!!!!!
15.6.1 Qualifiers:
Each qualifying heat shall be run group start style. Each car will count separately and will be on its own clock unless an exception is noted in the class specification
07-21-2008, 10:54 AM
#328
NO MORE HEADS UP AS RULE 15.6.1 SAYS!!!!!!!!
This rule explains that we will start in a group but each car having its own clock. This is great so it is ifmar just the anounser wont car go car 1 go car 2 and so on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!GLAD TO SEE THIS!!!!!!!!!
15.6.1 Qualifiers:
Each qualifying heat shall be run group start style. Each car will count separately and will be on its own clock unless an exception is noted in the class specification
This rule explains that we will start in a group but each car having its own clock. This is great so it is ifmar just the anounser wont car go car 1 go car 2 and so on!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!GLAD TO SEE THIS!!!!!!!!!
15.6.1 Qualifiers:
Each qualifying heat shall be run group start style. Each car will count separately and will be on its own clock unless an exception is noted in the class specification
You need to recheck each class where it says same clock!
07-21-2008, 10:56 AM
#329