Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
aluminum chassis fad or real performance option? >

aluminum chassis fad or real performance option?

Community
Wiki Posts
Search

aluminum chassis fad or real performance option?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 03-02-2016, 10:05 AM
  #31  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 886
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by silden
Titanium is way to soft to be used as a chassis. it will bent easily.
I disagree, Titanium much more stronger.
Tim3 is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 10:32 AM
  #32  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (10)
 
Brian McGreevy's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Illinois
Posts: 4,081
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Tim3
I disagree, Titanium much more stronger.
Titanium has extremely high ultimate strength, about 50% higher than stainless steel, but its modulus (stiffness) is not all that much higher than aluminum for all that strength.

Aluminum: 72 GPa
Titanium: 114 GPa
304 SS: ~190-200 GPa

Given the cost, it's not really a viable thing for this application. It'll be the same weight for a similarly stiff chassis compared to aluminum, however, so you're just paying more for a chassis that's less likely to bend, but isn't stiffer than an aluminum counterpart (so no performance advantage).

Last edited by Brian McGreevy; 03-02-2016 at 11:44 AM.
Brian McGreevy is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 10:54 AM
  #33  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 886
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

I agree.. BUT ! it's stiffness is higher than aluminum buy a little.. I'll take that and the much more higher price of it.

If you don't wont it, sell it to me.
Tim3 is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 12:15 PM
  #34  
Tech Lord
 
Roelof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,338
Default

Most people think 7075 aluminium is the best to have. Well... there is something better called 7068
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7068_aluminium_alloy
Roelof is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 12:20 PM
  #35  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (4)
 
bdmpastx's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Pearland, TX
Posts: 472
Trader Rating: 4 (100%+)
Default

Let's not forget about unobtainum for that matter.
bdmpastx is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 12:53 PM
  #36  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 886
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Grate info !!
Tim3 is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 01:15 PM
  #37  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 7,762
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

GREAT info indeed !!!
bertrandsv87 is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 02:56 PM
  #38  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,136
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

Titanium is considerably heavier than aluminum. Titanium is 60% the weight of steel and aluminum is 60% the weight of titanium.. Magnesium is what you want if you are looking for something stiffer and lighter than aluminum but it will break during a hard impact much like glass would
Racermac73 is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 03:10 PM
  #39  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (3)
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Location: Virginia
Posts: 2,136
Trader Rating: 3 (100%+)
Default

On the subject of 7075T6 of course there are other alloys that look better on paper but 7075 has extremely high machinability properties and values that make it exceptional for what we do in the hobby.
Racermac73 is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 06:06 PM
  #40  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
xevias's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Shanghai, PRC
Posts: 386
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

At what point do we start seeing 3D printed chassis and parts?

Would be so much easier to purchase a license or plan from the manufacture, then have the part printed at my local hobby shop.

So many financial benefits to this distribution model, but is the science there yet?
xevias is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 08:07 PM
  #41  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (12)
 
silden's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 982
Trader Rating: 12 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by xevias
At what point do we start seeing 3D printed chassis and parts?

Would be so much easier to purchase a license or plan from the manufacture, then have the part printed at my local hobby shop.

So many financial benefits to this distribution model, but is the science there yet?
3d printing of parts sounds easy and cheap, but the opposite is true.
I ordered my self some prototype parts and that was really expensive and the fitment was not perfect. The reason for this is that a molded part will have close tolerances, but a 3D print will have a holes which are 3 to 5 tenth smaller as in the file. These tolerance comes from the resin and laser accuracy. The other down side is the durability of the parts. The resin is only melted layer by layer.

BTW the torsional stiffness of Titanium is not as high as Aluminum, that is the reason why a Bicycle with a Titanium frame feels more comfortable as one with an aluminum frame. Or a aluminum screw brakes and a titanium one bents.
silden is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 08:15 PM
  #42  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (9)
 
B00t13g's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Houston, TX
Posts: 2,041
Trader Rating: 9 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Roelof
Most people think 7075 aluminium is the best to have. Well... there is something better called 7068
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/7068_aluminium_alloy
7068 is harder to machine, harder to obtain, in fact i'm not sure if it's even available in sheets. It is also more brittle and substantially more expensive. 7075-T6 is the right choice.

Originally Posted by Racermac73
On the subject of 7075T6 of course there are other alloys that look better on paper but 7075 has extremely high machinability properties and values that make it exceptional for what we do in the hobby.
Exactly.
B00t13g is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 10:31 PM
  #43  
Tech Lord
 
Roelof's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Holland
Posts: 12,338
Default

Originally Posted by B00t13g
7068 is harder to machine, harder to obtain, in fact i'm not sure if it's even available in sheets. It is also more brittle and substantially more expensive. 7075-T6 is the right choice.
If it is all about performance then a difficulty in how to machine should not be an issue.
Roelof is offline  
Old 03-02-2016, 10:55 PM
  #44  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
gigaplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 6,255
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

If you guys are so keen on an ultra stiff chassis at any price, why not try diamond? Just don't crash.
gigaplex is online now  
Old 03-03-2016, 06:35 AM
  #45  
Tech Fanatic
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 886
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by gigaplex
If you guys are so keen on an ultra stiff chassis at any price, why not try diamond? Just don't crash.
LOL

They say if your not caught, then its not cheating. Say, running below inspection weight or one extra cell. ' ' WEL ' ' I have never done that..

If running a diamond chaises plate would give me an edge, I probably would give it a go..
Tim3 is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.