Go Back  R/C Tech Forums > General Forums > Electric On-Road
Team Associated TC7 & TC7.1 Touring Car >

Team Associated TC7 & TC7.1 Touring Car

Community
Wiki Posts
Search
Like Tree395Likes

Team Associated TC7 & TC7.1 Touring Car

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-02-2016, 05:00 PM
  #1396  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,088
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Jade67
Is there a spot where I can compare the TC7 to the TC7.1? Trying to decide if I should buy the TC7 new for $275 for the TC7.1 for the $470
I have both and run every Saturday on medium bite asphalt. I love both cars, but it's taken me some time to tune the 7.1 because it has more steering and for me that's not a good thing. I love my 7, but with some changes I've gotten the 7.1 to work well. For that money, I'd be tempted to go with the 7 unless you are running on carpet then I'd get the 7.1. But remember, once you get the 7, it will cost around $200 to upgrade, so if you think you will ever upgrade, buy the 7.1 now. Plus, you HAVE to get the steel front outdrives and the DCV's, that's another $50 to $60 you have to spend on the TC7 even if you don't upgrade it.

So the way I look at it, $275 plus $55 is $330 for the TC7. The TC7.1 can be had for around $410 if you have any Tower Coupons. So is it worth the $80 savings? That's a tough decision, I'd probably go with the 7.1, in the long run it will be the faster car. All the factory guys said they picked up some time with the 7.1.
glennhl is offline  
Old 12-02-2016, 07:26 PM
  #1397  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (1)
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: New Zealand
Posts: 409
Trader Rating: 1 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by Mikey D.
20.5mm is the width the car was designed with. I talked to Bob at AE about that for the same reason you're asking.
thanks Mikey, I had that number said by a few people now, so when Bob says that's what it, that's what it is 8)

ed
Edwin Pibal is offline  
Old 12-02-2016, 11:01 PM
  #1398  
Tech Regular
iTrader: (5)
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Location: Utah
Posts: 260
Trader Rating: 5 (100%+)
Default

Thank you. I will be running carpet so might as well go big out of the gate

Originally Posted by glennhl
I have both and run every Saturday on medium bite asphalt. I love both cars, but it's taken me some time to tune the 7.1 because it has more steering and for me that's not a good thing. I love my 7, but with some changes I've gotten the 7.1 to work well. For that money, I'd be tempted to go with the 7 unless you are running on carpet then I'd get the 7.1. But remember, once you get the 7, it will cost around $200 to upgrade, so if you think you will ever upgrade, buy the 7.1 now. Plus, you HAVE to get the steel front outdrives and the DCV's, that's another $50 to $60 you have to spend on the TC7 even if you don't upgrade it.

So the way I look at it, $275 plus $55 is $330 for the TC7. The TC7.1 can be had for around $410 if you have any Tower Coupons. So is it worth the $80 savings? That's a tough decision, I'd probably go with the 7.1, in the long run it will be the faster car. All the factory guys said they picked up some time with the 7.1.
Jade67 is offline  
Old 12-02-2016, 11:14 PM
  #1399  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (2)
 
gigaplex's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 6,257
Trader Rating: 2 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by glennhl
I have both and run every Saturday on medium bite asphalt. I love both cars, but it's taken me some time to tune the 7.1 because it has more steering and for me that's not a good thing. I love my 7, but with some changes I've gotten the 7.1 to work well. For that money, I'd be tempted to go with the 7 unless you are running on carpet then I'd get the 7.1. But remember, once you get the 7, it will cost around $200 to upgrade, so if you think you will ever upgrade, buy the 7.1 now. Plus, you HAVE to get the steel front outdrives and the DCV's, that's another $50 to $60 you have to spend on the TC7 even if you don't upgrade it.

So the way I look at it, $275 plus $55 is $330 for the TC7. The TC7.1 can be had for around $410 if you have any Tower Coupons. So is it worth the $80 savings? That's a tough decision, I'd probably go with the 7.1, in the long run it will be the faster car. All the factory guys said they picked up some time with the 7.1.
If you've got Tower coupons, the TC7 plus extras won't cost $330.
gigaplex is online now  
Old 12-03-2016, 04:53 AM
  #1400  
Tech Adept
 
AeRacer805's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Round Rock, Tx
Posts: 199
Default Front body post

I'am planning on running some Tamiya bodies for the USGT class at my local track. If the stock front body post aren't long enough to fit the bodies. What other brand of body post do you USGT guys suggest for my TC7.1?
AeRacer805 is offline  
Old 12-03-2016, 06:44 AM
  #1401  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,088
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by gigaplex
If you've got Tower coupons, the TC7 plus extras won't cost $330.
Oops, you are absolutely correct. It will be around $300. I don't remember what the coupons was for $345 total, probably around $40 to $50 off. And the 7 is $290 at Tower, not the $275 he found. But he said he is going to run on high bite carpet, so with that info, I'd definitely go with the 7.1
glennhl is offline  
Old 12-04-2016, 03:47 AM
  #1402  
Tech Adept
 
AeRacer805's Avatar
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Location: Round Rock, Tx
Posts: 199
Default Body post

I plan on running some Tamiya bodies for the USGT class at my local track. If the stock body post that come with TC7.1 are too short what other brand of body post do you USGT guys suggest that I use?
AeRacer805 is offline  
Old 12-04-2016, 04:15 AM
  #1403  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (261)
 
Scottrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 6,380
Trader Rating: 261 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by AeRacer805
I plan on running some Tamiya bodies for the USGT class at my local track. If the stock body post that come with TC7.1 are too short what other brand of body post do you USGT guys suggest that I use?
The stock body posts can be extended quite easily with some 3mm shims (like are used for suspension link adjustments) and longer 3mm flat head screws. I mounted a HPI Dodge Challenger body on my TC6.2 (same posts) doing this. It took a fair number of shims (iir about a centimeter/10mm worth) and some 25mm longs screws. 30mm screws wouldn't be a bad idea and cut to length.

Scott
Scottrik is offline  
Old 12-04-2016, 02:43 PM
  #1404  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,088
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by glennhl
OK, I went 2 dots out on the front of my TC7.1 along with blue springs (15.8), I was 2 dots in with gray springs (14.8). I reset the front toe and camber and rebalanced the car. We'll see how that works this Saturday. Thanks for everyone's help.

I left my TC7 alone, 2 dots in on the front, gray springs all the way around. I think the TC7.1 has more steering and the good drivers like that, but I'm not in their league and I want a car that's a little easier to drive.
Well, the track was rather slippery this last Saturday, the experts were over a lap off their typical runs. The TC7.1 (21.5) was still a little loose coming out of the turns on power. So was the TC7 (17.5). Well, I'm going to load on the Randy Caster setup that he used at our track (Mesa, Arizona outside sealed asphalt). I'm putting .5mm of anti-dive in the rear of both cars, should be more stable on power. I also set the roll centers like Randy used and on the TC7.1 I will run the same progressive springs in the front (2.5-2.7) and the 2.7 springs in the rear. On the TC7, I'm leaving the gray springs all around. The only real difference from Randy's setup is I will continue to run 3 degrees rear toe instead of 2.5 (I need the stability) and I will run a little wider front track. We will see if this helps. My only problem is I hope I'm not chasing a set up just because the track was cold and slippery.
glennhl is offline  
Old 12-04-2016, 03:05 PM
  #1405  
Tech Champion
iTrader: (261)
 
Scottrik's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: Billings, MT
Posts: 6,380
Trader Rating: 261 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by glennhl
Well, the track was rather slippery this last Saturday, the experts were over a lap off their typical runs. The TC7.1 (21.5) was still a little loose coming out of the turns on power. So was the TC7 (17.5). Well, I'm going to load on the Randy Caster setup that he used at our track (Mesa, Arizona outside sealed asphalt). I'm putting .5mm of anti-dive in the rear of both cars, should be more stable on power. I also set the roll centers like Randy used and on the TC7.1 I will run the same progressive springs in the front (2.5-2.7) and the 2.7 springs in the rear. On the TC7, I'm leaving the gray springs all around. The only real difference from Randy's setup is I will continue to run 3 degrees rear toe instead of 2.5 (I need the stability) and I will run a little wider front track. We will see if this helps. My only problem is I hope I'm not chasing a set up just because the track was cold and slippery.
The track condition can't be helped, you have no control over that. What I WOULD suggest is that you have made two comparatively big changes by moving your arms out AND going to stiffer springs (hopefully you didn't change shock mounting holes too, thus a third change). What you don't know is if one of the changes helped and one hurt, whether both helped incrementally, one or the other made no difference, etc. You really should try to keep things to one change at a time so you can ascertain exactly what seems to help and what makes no measurable difference or works against you.

Scott
Scottrik is offline  
Old 12-04-2016, 03:09 PM
  #1406  
Tech Master
iTrader: (10)
 
tbrymer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,555
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by glennhl
Well, the track was rather slippery this last Saturday, the experts were over a lap off their typical runs. The TC7.1 (21.5) was still a little loose coming out of the turns on power. So was the TC7 (17.5). Well, I'm going to load on the Randy Caster setup that he used at our track (Mesa, Arizona outside sealed asphalt). I'm putting .5mm of anti-dive in the rear of both cars, should be more stable on power. I also set the roll centers like Randy used and on the TC7.1 I will run the same progressive springs in the front (2.5-2.7) and the 2.7 springs in the rear. On the TC7, I'm leaving the gray springs all around. The only real difference from Randy's setup is I will continue to run 3 degrees rear toe instead of 2.5 (I need the stability) and I will run a little wider front track. We will see if this helps. My only problem is I hope I'm not chasing a set up just because the track was cold and slippery.
Don't count this past weekend. Try your changes when the track is typical. Also, remember that Randy was running modified and you are talking about a 21.5 and 17.5 class.
tbrymer is offline  
Old 12-04-2016, 03:20 PM
  #1407  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,088
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by tbrymer
Don't count this past weekend. Try your changes when the track is typical. Also, remember that Randy was running modified and you are talking about a 21.5 and 17.5 class.
I thought about the modified, but it seems to me if he is not loose with a mod motor, I should be great with 17.5 and 21.5 motors. I'm kind of surprised that the track was not good yesterday, it really wasn't that cold out. Must have been the rain washing away our accumulated sugar coating.
glennhl is offline  
Old 12-04-2016, 03:36 PM
  #1408  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (50)
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Covington, La.
Posts: 3,595
Trader Rating: 50 (98%+)
Default

Originally Posted by glennhl
Well, the track was rather slippery this last Saturday, the experts were over a lap off their typical runs. The TC7.1 (21.5) was still a little loose coming out of the turns on power. So was the TC7 (17.5). Well, I'm going to load on the Randy Caster setup that he used at our track (Mesa, Arizona outside sealed asphalt). I'm putting .5mm of anti-dive in the rear of both cars, should be more stable on power. I also set the roll centers like Randy used and on the TC7.1 I will run the same progressive springs in the front (2.5-2.7) and the 2.7 springs in the rear. On the TC7, I'm leaving the gray springs all around. The only real difference from Randy's setup is I will continue to run 3 degrees rear toe instead of 2.5 (I need the stability) and I will run a little wider front track. We will see if this helps. My only problem is I hope I'm not chasing a set up just because the track was cold and slippery.
Try the 2.5 is the rear over the 2.7.
micrors4guy is offline  
Old 12-04-2016, 03:49 PM
  #1409  
Tech Elite
iTrader: (16)
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Location: Arizona
Posts: 2,088
Trader Rating: 16 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by micrors4guy
Try the 2.5 is the rear over the 2.7.
I will do that if I'm still loose, I have the Associated Grays on the rear right now (2.65 to be exact) and I can go to the Associated Whites on the rear which are 2.47.
glennhl is offline  
Old 12-04-2016, 06:11 PM
  #1410  
Tech Master
iTrader: (10)
 
tbrymer's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Arizona
Posts: 1,555
Trader Rating: 10 (100%+)
Default

Originally Posted by glennhl
I will do that if I'm still loose, I have the Associated Grays on the rear right now (2.65 to be exact) and I can go to the Associated Whites on the rear which are 2.47.
Like someone mentioned above 2.5 in rear with the 2.5-2.8 progressive in the front seems to work pretty well on our track.
tbrymer is offline  


Contact Us - Archive - Advertising - Cookie Policy - Privacy Statement - Terms of Service -

Copyright © 2024 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.