![]() |
Originally Posted by cplus
(Post 13743272)
Hey definitely do on the lower end kits.
Hell, you could build a TA06 tourer or CR-01 crawler with pretty much 100% hop up parts. The 418/419 come pretty much fully loaded though. Compared to xray/yoko that are missing say floating servo mounts, DCJs or carbon parts the tamiya kits are not bad. The ball nuts are a nice addition though, but $30 to get setup (incl. the hollow screws) is a little much! TRF kits are not. Not sure where you buy your grubscrews but I have a good nut and bolt shop just around the corner where I can get any length from 3mm to 25mm in 2mm increments and they're peanuts. Tamiya's ball nuts are a different story. Nearly 10 bucks a set of 4 (plus postage)? And by the time you take out all the slop on all joints (steering and suspension) by using these, you're out of pocket way above any other kit on the market. This is not okay when the competition has slop free ball joints in their kits as standard (which is the way it should be). What's so difficult, anyway? Slop free joints are not an optional extra on a top spec car. |
Originally Posted by Marcika
(Post 13743353)
Hey,
Two more questions ;): 1. Do you know what to use for little plastic in K parts called as spare parts? 2. Which holes do you use in front outdrive? There are two positions....short makes so much play left-right... Thanks Marton i see hole put pin in.. |
Thanks for the clarification
Originally Posted by kentech
(Post 13743581)
On the front joints, it's shown in the manual which holes to use. They even added a "note direction" text there. You should use the holes that are not in-line with the driveshaft slots. Check the manual again and you will see.
|
Originally Posted by niznai
(Post 13743595)
Not sure where you buy your grubscrews but I have a good nut and bolt shop just around the corner where I can get any length from 3mm to 25mm in 2mm increments and they're peanuts.
Originally Posted by niznai
(Post 13743595)
And by the time you take out all the slop on all joints (steering and suspension) by using these, you're out of pocket way above any other kit on the market.
|
Originally Posted by Gordie88
(Post 13743731)
darn now i have to check my car.... i didn't even use the instructions for drivetrain lol
i see hole put pin in.. |
Originally Posted by cplus
(Post 13743984)
I was referring to the TRF hollow screws which are drug money :D
You're using them everywhere? Hell. Stuff that. I didn't think slop was that much of an issue, I only use the TRF ball nuts for convenience of shock removal. It didn't even occur to me to use them on all the joints. You're using hollow screws but think slop is okay? Do you race your cars or put them in glass boxes on shelves and list all the hop ups in your signature? |
Originally Posted by niznai
(Post 13744031)
Hollow screws? What do you need that for?
You're using hollow screws but think slop is okay? Do you race your cars or put them in glass boxes on shelves and list in your signature all the hop ups? I don't think slop is "ok" I'm saying I didn't notice it as an issue on my car - but I haven't got much to compare to. |
Originally Posted by kentech
(Post 13743570)
Just to reach weight. The car was 1280g without weights, so I added 75g since the limit is 1350g.
Nothing special about my setup. You can read all equipment I use on my blog. Should be easy to reach this unless you use a very heavy battery. Remember you can play with the position of the receiver, transponder and ESC as well. Added most (50g) of the weight in the center of the car behind the servo mount and in front of the motor mount at about center line. The rest (25g) in front of the steering posts. Would you recomend adding 40g extra (which would make my car 1380g) to have a perfect L/R balance, or is it better to save 40g and have a very slightly unbalance L/R ? Thanks. |
Originally Posted by MatJ
(Post 13744194)
Thank you fort the response.
Would you recomend adding 40g extra (which would make my car 1380g) to have a perfect L/R balance, or is it better to save 40g and have a very slightly unbalance L/R ? Thanks. |
Originally Posted by kentech
(Post 13731055)
Rear posts are a bit further back on the 419.
I slipped my old 417/418 holed body onto the 419 just fine without any modifications or adjustments when building according to kit. |
Yes, the Body from the 418, EVO 6 all fit the TRF419 :nod:
|
Originally Posted by cplus
(Post 13744714)
You can offset the location of your lipo with. More/less spacers on the lipo stopper - have you considered that?
|
Originally Posted by torg
(Post 13744901)
Can you define "a bit"? is it 1mm or less?
I slipped my old 417/418 holed body onto the 419 just fine without any modifications or adjustments when building according to kit.
Originally Posted by Simmi
(Post 13744916)
Yes, the Body from the 418, EVO 6 all fit the TRF419 :nod:
|
Originally Posted by MatJ
(Post 13744194)
Thank you fort the response.
Would you recomend adding 40g extra (which would make my car 1380g) to have a perfect L/R balance, or is it better to save 40g and have a very slightly unbalance L/R ? Thanks.
Originally Posted by torg
(Post 13744901)
Can you define "a bit"? is it 1mm or less?
I slipped my old 417/418 holed body onto the 419 just fine without any modifications or adjustments when building according to kit. |
New Alu Chassis TRF 419 from Samix :D
More on RedRC http://www.redrc.net/2014/12/samix-4...is/#more-90792 |
| All times are GMT -7. It is currently 11:59 AM. |
Powered By: vBulletin v3.9.3.9 Patch Level 3
Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands. All rights reserved. Use of this site indicates your consent to the Terms of Use.